exec ls and terminal completed [duplicate]

up vote
0
down vote

favorite

This question already has an answer here:

What's the difference between eval and exec?

4 answers

Does running “exec echo some; echo test” in bash never print “some test”?

3 answers

When I try to exec a ls

 $ exec ls
 Vocabulary.md count_files.sh hours.bak.sh read_default.sh test.c
 a.out data.md isphone.sh 
[Process completed]

The terminal completed.

What does it happen here?

asked Nov 17 at 2:51

avirate

447210

marked as duplicate by muru, Filipe Brandenburger, Henrik, Thomas, Jeff Schaller 2 days ago

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

exec replaces the current shell - see also Does running “exec echo some; echo test” in bash never print “some test”?
– steeldriver
Nov 17 at 3:01

add a comment |

up vote
0
down vote

favorite

This question already has an answer here:

What's the difference between eval and exec?

4 answers

Does running “exec echo some; echo test” in bash never print “some test”?

3 answers

When I try to exec a ls

 $ exec ls
 Vocabulary.md count_files.sh hours.bak.sh read_default.sh test.c
 a.out data.md isphone.sh 
[Process completed]

The terminal completed.

What does it happen here?

asked Nov 17 at 2:51

avirate

447210

marked as duplicate by muru, Filipe Brandenburger, Henrik, Thomas, Jeff Schaller 2 days ago

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

exec replaces the current shell - see also Does running “exec echo some; echo test” in bash never print “some test”?
– steeldriver
Nov 17 at 3:01

add a comment |

up vote
0
down vote

favorite

This question already has an answer here:

What's the difference between eval and exec?

4 answers

Does running “exec echo some; echo test” in bash never print “some test”?

3 answers

When I try to exec a ls

 $ exec ls
 Vocabulary.md count_files.sh hours.bak.sh read_default.sh test.c
 a.out data.md isphone.sh 
[Process completed]

The terminal completed.

What does it happen here?

asked Nov 17 at 2:51

avirate

447210

This question already has an answer here:

What's the difference between eval and exec?

4 answers

Does running “exec echo some; echo test” in bash never print “some test”?

3 answers

When I try to exec a ls

 $ exec ls
 Vocabulary.md count_files.sh hours.bak.sh read_default.sh test.c
 a.out data.md isphone.sh 
[Process completed]

The terminal completed.

What does it happen here?

This question already has an answer here:

What's the difference between eval and exec?

4 answers

Does running “exec echo some; echo test” in bash never print “some test”?

3 answers

bash

asked Nov 17 at 2:51

avirate

447210

asked Nov 17 at 2:51

avirate

447210

asked Nov 17 at 2:51

avirate

447210

asked Nov 17 at 2:51

avirate

447210

asked Nov 17 at 2:51

avirate

447210

marked as duplicate by muru, Filipe Brandenburger, Henrik, Thomas, Jeff Schaller 2 days ago

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

marked as duplicate by muru, Filipe Brandenburger, Henrik, Thomas, Jeff Schaller 2 days ago

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

exec replaces the current shell - see also Does running “exec echo some; echo test” in bash never print “some test”?
– steeldriver
Nov 17 at 3:01

add a comment |

exec replaces the current shell - see also Does running “exec echo some; echo test” in bash never print “some test”?
– steeldriver
Nov 17 at 3:01

exec replaces the current shell - see also Does running “exec echo some; echo test” in bash never print “some test”?
– steeldriver
Nov 17 at 3:01

add a comment |

active

oldest

votes

搜尋此網誌

mjhjmtu