Can only mount with gparted

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have the following /etc/fstab entry which fails to execute at system boot/startup:



/dev/sdb1 /media/ssd256 ext4 rw,user,exec,umask=000 0 0


Doing



sudo mount -a


yields:



mount: /media/ssd256: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.


However, if I sudo gparted and mount via its UI, then the device is mounted.
I am not sure how to fix this issue.



EDIT:
I changed the options to use defaults instead of rw,user,exec,umask=000, now sudo mount -a also works.
The question now is: what is wrong with my initial options?




mount gparted




share|improve this question


















  • 2




    Does gparted actually show an ext4 filesystem type for this device? What output for fsck command on /dev/sdb1? What if you replace options rw,user,exec,umask=000 with just "defaults"?
    – tonioc
    Jan 13 at 8:30










  • Did you fsck /dev/sdb1 ?
    – Mukesh Sai Kumar
    Jan 13 at 8:33














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have the following /etc/fstab entry which fails to execute at system boot/startup:



/dev/sdb1 /media/ssd256 ext4 rw,user,exec,umask=000 0 0


Doing



sudo mount -a


yields:



mount: /media/ssd256: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.


However, if I sudo gparted and mount via its UI, then the device is mounted.
I am not sure how to fix this issue.



EDIT:
I changed the options to use defaults instead of rw,user,exec,umask=000, now sudo mount -a also works.
The question now is: what is wrong with my initial options?




mount gparted




share|improve this question


















  • 2




    Does gparted actually show an ext4 filesystem type for this device? What output for fsck command on /dev/sdb1? What if you replace options rw,user,exec,umask=000 with just "defaults"?
    – tonioc
    Jan 13 at 8:30










  • Did you fsck /dev/sdb1 ?
    – Mukesh Sai Kumar
    Jan 13 at 8:33












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I have the following /etc/fstab entry which fails to execute at system boot/startup:



/dev/sdb1 /media/ssd256 ext4 rw,user,exec,umask=000 0 0


Doing



sudo mount -a


yields:



mount: /media/ssd256: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.


However, if I sudo gparted and mount via its UI, then the device is mounted.
I am not sure how to fix this issue.



EDIT:
I changed the options to use defaults instead of rw,user,exec,umask=000, now sudo mount -a also works.
The question now is: what is wrong with my initial options?




mount gparted




share|improve this question














I have the following /etc/fstab entry which fails to execute at system boot/startup:



/dev/sdb1 /media/ssd256 ext4 rw,user,exec,umask=000 0 0


Doing



sudo mount -a


yields:



mount: /media/ssd256: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.


However, if I sudo gparted and mount via its UI, then the device is mounted.
I am not sure how to fix this issue.



EDIT:
I changed the options to use defaults instead of rw,user,exec,umask=000, now sudo mount -a also works.
The question now is: what is wrong with my initial options?





mount gparted





share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 13 at 8:37

























asked Jan 13 at 8:21









erdal.karaca

1033




1033







  • 2




    Does gparted actually show an ext4 filesystem type for this device? What output for fsck command on /dev/sdb1? What if you replace options rw,user,exec,umask=000 with just "defaults"?
    – tonioc
    Jan 13 at 8:30










  • Did you fsck /dev/sdb1 ?
    – Mukesh Sai Kumar
    Jan 13 at 8:33












  • 2




    Does gparted actually show an ext4 filesystem type for this device? What output for fsck command on /dev/sdb1? What if you replace options rw,user,exec,umask=000 with just "defaults"?
    – tonioc
    Jan 13 at 8:30










  • Did you fsck /dev/sdb1 ?
    – Mukesh Sai Kumar
    Jan 13 at 8:33







2




2




Does gparted actually show an ext4 filesystem type for this device? What output for fsck command on /dev/sdb1? What if you replace options rw,user,exec,umask=000 with just "defaults"?
– tonioc
Jan 13 at 8:30




Does gparted actually show an ext4 filesystem type for this device? What output for fsck command on /dev/sdb1? What if you replace options rw,user,exec,umask=000 with just "defaults"?
– tonioc
Jan 13 at 8:30












Did you fsck /dev/sdb1 ?
– Mukesh Sai Kumar
Jan 13 at 8:33




Did you fsck /dev/sdb1 ?
– Mukesh Sai Kumar
Jan 13 at 8:33










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










dmesg| tail will show



EXT4-fs (dm-4): Unrecognized mount option "umask=000" or missing value


Indeed, umask option is not part of accepted ones for ext4 fs : see man mount



this is why...






share|improve this answer




















    Your Answer







    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "106"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f416763%2fcan-only-mount-with-gparted%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest

















    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    dmesg| tail will show



    EXT4-fs (dm-4): Unrecognized mount option "umask=000" or missing value


    Indeed, umask option is not part of accepted ones for ext4 fs : see man mount



    this is why...






    share|improve this answer
























      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      dmesg| tail will show



      EXT4-fs (dm-4): Unrecognized mount option "umask=000" or missing value


      Indeed, umask option is not part of accepted ones for ext4 fs : see man mount



      this is why...






      share|improve this answer






















        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted






        dmesg| tail will show



        EXT4-fs (dm-4): Unrecognized mount option "umask=000" or missing value


        Indeed, umask option is not part of accepted ones for ext4 fs : see man mount



        this is why...






        share|improve this answer












        dmesg| tail will show



        EXT4-fs (dm-4): Unrecognized mount option "umask=000" or missing value


        Indeed, umask option is not part of accepted ones for ext4 fs : see man mount



        this is why...







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Jan 13 at 9:13









        tonioc

        1,12457




        1,12457






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f416763%2fcan-only-mount-with-gparted%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest
































































            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Sep 26 at 0:12 ToanLuong 49 9 add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this questi...
            Read more

            Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP 1 How can I extract a single band from multi-band raster in QGIS? I have an remote sensed image which has 6 bands (including NDVI band), I want to display each band separately, but have no idea how to do. I have seen some questions similar here but none worked for me. The original image (has 6 bands) is: I want to display the band 6 which should be like this: But I tried gdal_translate, and couldn't get the correct result. What I have got is: qgis raster multi-band share | improve this question edited Mar 5 at 0:53 Summer asked Mar 4 at 6:42 Summer Summer 23 6 Is this any help gis.stackexchange.com/questions/220658/… ? if not gis.stackexchange.com/questions/62133/… might help. – Michael Stimson Mar 4 at 6:46 Thanks for answering but when I used gdal_translate, qgis showed that 'Error 4: Kayena.tif: No such file or directory". Would you know how to fi...
            Read more

            How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite I am currently learning reverse engineering and am studying the flags register. I had in my mind that rflags was just another name for one of the 16 general purpose registers, for example rax or rbx . But it looks like rflags is actually an additional register. So that makes 17 registers in total... how many more could there be? I have spent at least an hour on this and found numerous different answers. The best answer so far is this, which says that there are 40 registers in total. 16 General Purpose Registers 2 Status Registers 6 Code Segment Registers 16 SSE Registers 8 FPU/MMX Registers But if I add that up, I get 48. Could anybody provide an official answer on how many registers an x86_64 CPU has (e.g. an Intel i7). Additionally, I have seen references to 'hardware' and 'architectural' registers. What are those registers and how many are there? register x86-64 share | improve this...
            Read more