Understanding a proof about a set being closed
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
$begingroup$
Let $r > 0$ be a positive number, and define $F = u$. Prove $F$ is closed in
$mathbbR^n$.
Proof:
We want to show that if a sequence $u_k$ lies in $F$ and $lim_ktoinfty u_k = u$, then $u in F$. Let $u_k$ be in arbitrary sequence in $F$. By the set definition of $F$, it follows that $|u_k| leq r$ for each index $k$. Thus,
$$lim_ktoinfty |u_k| leq lim_ktoinfty r = r.$$
From here, it suffices to show $lim_ktoinfty |u_k| = |u|$.
The proof goes on and shows that $lim_ktoinfty |u_k| = |u|$
My question:
I don't understand why it suffices to show that the sequence of norms converges to the norm of the limit point? After they prove this fact, they say that $lim_ktoinfty |u_k| = |u| = r$, from which it follows that $u in F$, hence $F$ is closed. But, I don't get why proving this shows that $u$ is contained in $F$.
real-analysis general-topology limits elementary-set-theory convergence
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $r > 0$ be a positive number, and define $F = u$. Prove $F$ is closed in
$mathbbR^n$.
Proof:
We want to show that if a sequence $u_k$ lies in $F$ and $lim_ktoinfty u_k = u$, then $u in F$. Let $u_k$ be in arbitrary sequence in $F$. By the set definition of $F$, it follows that $|u_k| leq r$ for each index $k$. Thus,
$$lim_ktoinfty |u_k| leq lim_ktoinfty r = r.$$
From here, it suffices to show $lim_ktoinfty |u_k| = |u|$.
The proof goes on and shows that $lim_ktoinfty |u_k| = |u|$
My question:
I don't understand why it suffices to show that the sequence of norms converges to the norm of the limit point? After they prove this fact, they say that $lim_ktoinfty |u_k| = |u| = r$, from which it follows that $u in F$, hence $F$ is closed. But, I don't get why proving this shows that $u$ is contained in $F$.
real-analysis general-topology limits elementary-set-theory convergence
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $r > 0$ be a positive number, and define $F = u$. Prove $F$ is closed in
$mathbbR^n$.
Proof:
We want to show that if a sequence $u_k$ lies in $F$ and $lim_ktoinfty u_k = u$, then $u in F$. Let $u_k$ be in arbitrary sequence in $F$. By the set definition of $F$, it follows that $|u_k| leq r$ for each index $k$. Thus,
$$lim_ktoinfty |u_k| leq lim_ktoinfty r = r.$$
From here, it suffices to show $lim_ktoinfty |u_k| = |u|$.
The proof goes on and shows that $lim_ktoinfty |u_k| = |u|$
My question:
I don't understand why it suffices to show that the sequence of norms converges to the norm of the limit point? After they prove this fact, they say that $lim_ktoinfty |u_k| = |u| = r$, from which it follows that $u in F$, hence $F$ is closed. But, I don't get why proving this shows that $u$ is contained in $F$.
real-analysis general-topology limits elementary-set-theory convergence
$endgroup$
Let $r > 0$ be a positive number, and define $F = u$. Prove $F$ is closed in
$mathbbR^n$.
Proof:
We want to show that if a sequence $u_k$ lies in $F$ and $lim_ktoinfty u_k = u$, then $u in F$. Let $u_k$ be in arbitrary sequence in $F$. By the set definition of $F$, it follows that $|u_k| leq r$ for each index $k$. Thus,
$$lim_ktoinfty |u_k| leq lim_ktoinfty r = r.$$
From here, it suffices to show $lim_ktoinfty |u_k| = |u|$.
The proof goes on and shows that $lim_ktoinfty |u_k| = |u|$
My question:
I don't understand why it suffices to show that the sequence of norms converges to the norm of the limit point? After they prove this fact, they say that $lim_ktoinfty |u_k| = |u| = r$, from which it follows that $u in F$, hence $F$ is closed. But, I don't get why proving this shows that $u$ is contained in $F$.
real-analysis general-topology limits elementary-set-theory convergence
real-analysis general-topology limits elementary-set-theory convergence
edited Mar 10 at 15:20
Community♦
1
1
asked Mar 10 at 5:52
user651921
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I think you are a bit confused so I'll try to make up the argument with more details. First, showing that a set is closed is equivalent to showing that every converging sequence has a limit point IN the set. Here the set we are concerned with is $F=leq r$. Thus, if we pick a sequence $(u_k)_ksubset F$ such that $u_kto u$, it suffices to show that $uin F$ to prove that $F$ is closed. What does it mean to be an element of $F$ ? It means simply that $||u||leq r$ ! So we have to show that $||u||leq r$ :) That's why it is sufficient to show that the norm of the $u_k$'s goes to the norm of $u$ because $||u_k||leq r$ for all $k$ and by taking the limit inside the norm because the norm is continuous, we get $||u||leq r$ which is the condition an element of $mathbbR^n$ has to satisfy to be in $F$.
If you want more details, let me know !
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The proof provided by Malik is correct. I'm giving a separate answer because there's another approach that often works in general and is often easier. A set is closed if its complement is open. So assume you have a point $x notin F$, so that $||x|| gt r$. Can you prove that there's necessarily an open ball around $r$ that does not intersect $F$?
Hint: Let $||x|| = r+a, a gt 0$. Let $epsilon = a/2$ and consider $B(x, epsilon)$ using the triangle inequality.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can also notice that proving
$$
lim_kto infty ||u_k||=||u||
$$
proves that $f(u) =||u||$ is continuous. Now,
$$
F=le r =f^leftarrow([0,r]).
$$
Recalling that if $f$ is continuous and $C$ is closed then $f^leftarrow(C)$ is closed, the result follows from the fact that $[0,r]$ is closed in $mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3142014%2funderstanding-a-proof-about-a-set-being-closed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I think you are a bit confused so I'll try to make up the argument with more details. First, showing that a set is closed is equivalent to showing that every converging sequence has a limit point IN the set. Here the set we are concerned with is $F=leq r$. Thus, if we pick a sequence $(u_k)_ksubset F$ such that $u_kto u$, it suffices to show that $uin F$ to prove that $F$ is closed. What does it mean to be an element of $F$ ? It means simply that $||u||leq r$ ! So we have to show that $||u||leq r$ :) That's why it is sufficient to show that the norm of the $u_k$'s goes to the norm of $u$ because $||u_k||leq r$ for all $k$ and by taking the limit inside the norm because the norm is continuous, we get $||u||leq r$ which is the condition an element of $mathbbR^n$ has to satisfy to be in $F$.
If you want more details, let me know !
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think you are a bit confused so I'll try to make up the argument with more details. First, showing that a set is closed is equivalent to showing that every converging sequence has a limit point IN the set. Here the set we are concerned with is $F=leq r$. Thus, if we pick a sequence $(u_k)_ksubset F$ such that $u_kto u$, it suffices to show that $uin F$ to prove that $F$ is closed. What does it mean to be an element of $F$ ? It means simply that $||u||leq r$ ! So we have to show that $||u||leq r$ :) That's why it is sufficient to show that the norm of the $u_k$'s goes to the norm of $u$ because $||u_k||leq r$ for all $k$ and by taking the limit inside the norm because the norm is continuous, we get $||u||leq r$ which is the condition an element of $mathbbR^n$ has to satisfy to be in $F$.
If you want more details, let me know !
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think you are a bit confused so I'll try to make up the argument with more details. First, showing that a set is closed is equivalent to showing that every converging sequence has a limit point IN the set. Here the set we are concerned with is $F=leq r$. Thus, if we pick a sequence $(u_k)_ksubset F$ such that $u_kto u$, it suffices to show that $uin F$ to prove that $F$ is closed. What does it mean to be an element of $F$ ? It means simply that $||u||leq r$ ! So we have to show that $||u||leq r$ :) That's why it is sufficient to show that the norm of the $u_k$'s goes to the norm of $u$ because $||u_k||leq r$ for all $k$ and by taking the limit inside the norm because the norm is continuous, we get $||u||leq r$ which is the condition an element of $mathbbR^n$ has to satisfy to be in $F$.
If you want more details, let me know !
$endgroup$
I think you are a bit confused so I'll try to make up the argument with more details. First, showing that a set is closed is equivalent to showing that every converging sequence has a limit point IN the set. Here the set we are concerned with is $F=leq r$. Thus, if we pick a sequence $(u_k)_ksubset F$ such that $u_kto u$, it suffices to show that $uin F$ to prove that $F$ is closed. What does it mean to be an element of $F$ ? It means simply that $||u||leq r$ ! So we have to show that $||u||leq r$ :) That's why it is sufficient to show that the norm of the $u_k$'s goes to the norm of $u$ because $||u_k||leq r$ for all $k$ and by taking the limit inside the norm because the norm is continuous, we get $||u||leq r$ which is the condition an element of $mathbbR^n$ has to satisfy to be in $F$.
If you want more details, let me know !
answered Mar 10 at 6:08
MalikMalik
23510
23510
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The proof provided by Malik is correct. I'm giving a separate answer because there's another approach that often works in general and is often easier. A set is closed if its complement is open. So assume you have a point $x notin F$, so that $||x|| gt r$. Can you prove that there's necessarily an open ball around $r$ that does not intersect $F$?
Hint: Let $||x|| = r+a, a gt 0$. Let $epsilon = a/2$ and consider $B(x, epsilon)$ using the triangle inequality.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The proof provided by Malik is correct. I'm giving a separate answer because there's another approach that often works in general and is often easier. A set is closed if its complement is open. So assume you have a point $x notin F$, so that $||x|| gt r$. Can you prove that there's necessarily an open ball around $r$ that does not intersect $F$?
Hint: Let $||x|| = r+a, a gt 0$. Let $epsilon = a/2$ and consider $B(x, epsilon)$ using the triangle inequality.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The proof provided by Malik is correct. I'm giving a separate answer because there's another approach that often works in general and is often easier. A set is closed if its complement is open. So assume you have a point $x notin F$, so that $||x|| gt r$. Can you prove that there's necessarily an open ball around $r$ that does not intersect $F$?
Hint: Let $||x|| = r+a, a gt 0$. Let $epsilon = a/2$ and consider $B(x, epsilon)$ using the triangle inequality.
$endgroup$
The proof provided by Malik is correct. I'm giving a separate answer because there's another approach that often works in general and is often easier. A set is closed if its complement is open. So assume you have a point $x notin F$, so that $||x|| gt r$. Can you prove that there's necessarily an open ball around $r$ that does not intersect $F$?
Hint: Let $||x|| = r+a, a gt 0$. Let $epsilon = a/2$ and consider $B(x, epsilon)$ using the triangle inequality.
answered Mar 10 at 8:21
Robert ShoreRobert Shore
3,611324
3,611324
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can also notice that proving
$$
lim_kto infty ||u_k||=||u||
$$
proves that $f(u) =||u||$ is continuous. Now,
$$
F=le r =f^leftarrow([0,r]).
$$
Recalling that if $f$ is continuous and $C$ is closed then $f^leftarrow(C)$ is closed, the result follows from the fact that $[0,r]$ is closed in $mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can also notice that proving
$$
lim_kto infty ||u_k||=||u||
$$
proves that $f(u) =||u||$ is continuous. Now,
$$
F=le r =f^leftarrow([0,r]).
$$
Recalling that if $f$ is continuous and $C$ is closed then $f^leftarrow(C)$ is closed, the result follows from the fact that $[0,r]$ is closed in $mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can also notice that proving
$$
lim_kto infty ||u_k||=||u||
$$
proves that $f(u) =||u||$ is continuous. Now,
$$
F=le r =f^leftarrow([0,r]).
$$
Recalling that if $f$ is continuous and $C$ is closed then $f^leftarrow(C)$ is closed, the result follows from the fact that $[0,r]$ is closed in $mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
You can also notice that proving
$$
lim_kto infty ||u_k||=||u||
$$
proves that $f(u) =||u||$ is continuous. Now,
$$
F=le r =f^leftarrow([0,r]).
$$
Recalling that if $f$ is continuous and $C$ is closed then $f^leftarrow(C)$ is closed, the result follows from the fact that $[0,r]$ is closed in $mathbb R$.
answered Mar 10 at 19:55
LonidardLonidard
2,96311021
2,96311021
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3142014%2funderstanding-a-proof-about-a-set-being-closed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown