Tense problem: What is the difference in meaning?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
1) Schools could ensure that motivated students participated.
2) Teachers could ensure that children gain more from working together.
Sentence 1 is about a hypothetical scenario in the future. This is why we have "could ensure" and "participated", but I saw sentence 2. It has "could ensure" but with the verb "gain".
Why is this?
What is the difference in the meaning?
If it not a hypothetical scenario in the future , why did the writer bring "could ensure"?
tense
asked Jan 1 at 16:06
Antonio ConteAntonio Conte
1397
add a comment |
1) Schools could ensure that motivated students participated.
2) Teachers could ensure that children gain more from working together.
Sentence 1 is about a hypothetical scenario in the future. This is why we have "could ensure" and "participated", but I saw sentence 2. It has "could ensure" but with the verb "gain".
Why is this?
What is the difference in the meaning?
If it not a hypothetical scenario in the future , why did the writer bring "could ensure"?
tense
asked Jan 1 at 16:06
Antonio ConteAntonio Conte
1397
On its own, as a complete sentence, your first example is in the past tense.
– Matt
Jan 1 at 16:33
add a comment |
1) Schools could ensure that motivated students participated.
2) Teachers could ensure that children gain more from working together.
Sentence 1 is about a hypothetical scenario in the future. This is why we have "could ensure" and "participated", but I saw sentence 2. It has "could ensure" but with the verb "gain".
Why is this?
What is the difference in the meaning?
If it not a hypothetical scenario in the future , why did the writer bring "could ensure"?
tense
asked Jan 1 at 16:06
Antonio ConteAntonio Conte
1397
1) Schools could ensure that motivated students participated.
2) Teachers could ensure that children gain more from working together.
Sentence 1 is about a hypothetical scenario in the future. This is why we have "could ensure" and "participated", but I saw sentence 2. It has "could ensure" but with the verb "gain".
Why is this?
What is the difference in the meaning?
If it not a hypothetical scenario in the future , why did the writer bring "could ensure"?
tense
tense
asked Jan 1 at 16:06
Antonio ConteAntonio Conte
1397
asked Jan 1 at 16:06
Antonio ConteAntonio Conte
1397
edited Jan 1 at 18:09
Antonio Conte
asked Jan 1 at 16:06
Antonio ConteAntonio Conte
1397
asked Jan 1 at 16:06
Antonio ConteAntonio Conte
1397
asked Jan 1 at 16:06
Antonio ConteAntonio Conte
1397
1397
On its own, as a complete sentence, your first example is in the past tense.
– Matt
Jan 1 at 16:33
add a comment |
On its own, as a complete sentence, your first example is in the past tense.
– Matt
Jan 1 at 16:33
On its own, as a complete sentence, your first example is in the past tense.
– Matt
Jan 1 at 16:33
On its own, as a complete sentence, your first example is in the past tense.
– Matt
Jan 1 at 16:33
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You have two different meanings of could.
In the first, it is the past of can, and this is either hypothetical in the present, or actual in the past (past of "Schools can ensure that motivated students participate")
In the second, because of the present verb in the dependent clause, this cannot be past, so it involves what is now a separate meaning of could: a more tentative or more dubious version of can: something like "teachers might be able to ensure".
answered Jan 1 at 16:46
Colin FineColin Fine
28.9k24156
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f191508%2ftense-problem-what-is-the-difference-in-meaning%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You have two different meanings of could.
In the first, it is the past of can, and this is either hypothetical in the present, or actual in the past (past of "Schools can ensure that motivated students participate")
In the second, because of the present verb in the dependent clause, this cannot be past, so it involves what is now a separate meaning of could: a more tentative or more dubious version of can: something like "teachers might be able to ensure".
answered Jan 1 at 16:46
Colin FineColin Fine
28.9k24156
add a comment |
You have two different meanings of could.
In the first, it is the past of can, and this is either hypothetical in the present, or actual in the past (past of "Schools can ensure that motivated students participate")
In the second, because of the present verb in the dependent clause, this cannot be past, so it involves what is now a separate meaning of could: a more tentative or more dubious version of can: something like "teachers might be able to ensure".
answered Jan 1 at 16:46
Colin FineColin Fine
28.9k24156
add a comment |
You have two different meanings of could.
In the first, it is the past of can, and this is either hypothetical in the present, or actual in the past (past of "Schools can ensure that motivated students participate")
In the second, because of the present verb in the dependent clause, this cannot be past, so it involves what is now a separate meaning of could: a more tentative or more dubious version of can: something like "teachers might be able to ensure".
answered Jan 1 at 16:46
Colin FineColin Fine
28.9k24156
You have two different meanings of could.
In the first, it is the past of can, and this is either hypothetical in the present, or actual in the past (past of "Schools can ensure that motivated students participate")
In the second, because of the present verb in the dependent clause, this cannot be past, so it involves what is now a separate meaning of could: a more tentative or more dubious version of can: something like "teachers might be able to ensure".
answered Jan 1 at 16:46
Colin FineColin Fine
28.9k24156
answered Jan 1 at 16:46
Colin FineColin Fine
28.9k24156
answered Jan 1 at 16:46
Colin FineColin Fine
28.9k24156
answered Jan 1 at 16:46
Colin FineColin Fine
28.9k24156
28.9k24156
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f191508%2ftense-problem-what-is-the-difference-in-meaning%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
On its own, as a complete sentence, your first example is in the past tense.
– Matt
Jan 1 at 16:33