Phylum


A high level taxonomic rank for organisms sharing a similar body plan




LifeDomainKingdomPhylumClassOrderFamilyGenusSpecies

The hierarchy of biological classification's eight major taxonomic ranks. A kingdom contains one or more phyla. Intermediate minor rankings are not shown.


In biology, a phylum (/ˈfləm/; plural: phyla) is a level of classification or taxonomic rank below Kingdom and above Class. Traditionally, in botany the term division has been used instead of phylum, although the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants accepts the terms as equivalent.[1][2][3] Depending on definitions, the animal kingdom Animalia or Metazoa contains approximately 35 phyla, the plant kingdom Plantae contains about 14, and the fungus kingdom Fungi contains about 8 phyla. Current research in phylogenetics is uncovering the relationships between phyla, which are contained in larger clades, like Ecdysozoa and Embryophyta.[citation needed]




Contents





  • 1 General description

    • 1.1 Definition based on genetic relation


    • 1.2 Definition based on body plan



  • 2 Known phyla

    • 2.1 Animals


    • 2.2 Plants


    • 2.3 Fungi


    • 2.4 Protista


    • 2.5 Bacteria


    • 2.6 Archaea



  • 3 See also


  • 4 Notes


  • 5 References


  • 6 External links




General description


The term phylum was coined in 1866 by Ernst Haeckel from the Greek phylon (φῦλον, "race, stock"), related to phyle (φυλή, "tribe, clan").[4] In plant taxonomy, August W. Eichler (1883) classified plants into five groups named divisions, a term that remains in use today for groups of plants, algae and fungi.[1][5]
The definitions of zoological phyla have changed from their origins in the six Linnaean classes and the four embranchements of Georges Cuvier.[6]


Informally, phyla can be thought of as groupings of organisms based on general specialization of body plan.[7] At its most basic, a phylum can be defined in two ways: as a group of organisms with a certain degree of morphological or developmental similarity (the phenetic definition), or a group of organisms with a certain degree of evolutionary relatedness (the phylogenetic definition).[8] Attempting to define a level of the Linnean hierarchy without referring to (evolutionary) relatedness is unsatisfactory, but a phenetic definition is useful when addressing questions of a morphological nature—such as how successful different body plans were.[citation needed]



Definition based on genetic relation


The most important objective measure in the above definitions is the "certain degree" that defines how different organisms need to be to be members of different phyla. The minimal requirement is that all organisms in a phylum should be clearly more closely related to one another than to any other group.[8] Even this is problematic because the requirement depends on knowledge of organisms' relationships: as more data become available, particularly from molecular studies, we are better able to determine the relationships between groups. So phyla can be merged or split if it becomes apparent that they are related to one another or not. For example, the bearded worms were described as a new phylum (the Pogonophora) in the middle of the 20th century, but molecular work almost half a century later found them to be a group of annelids, so the phyla were merged (the bearded worms are now an annelid family).[9] On the other hand, the highly parasitic phylum Mesozoa was divided into two phyla (Orthonectida and Rhombozoa) when it was discovered the Orthonectida are probably deuterostomes and the Rhombozoa protostomes.[10]


This changeability of phyla has led some biologists to call for the concept of a phylum to be abandoned in favour of cladistics, a method in which groups are placed on a "family tree" without any formal ranking of group size.[8]



Definition based on body plan


A definition of a phylum based on body plan has been proposed by paleontologists Graham Budd and Sören Jensen (as Haeckel had done a century earlier). The definition was posited because extinct organisms are hardest to classify: they can be offshoots that diverged from a phylum's line before the characters that define the modern phylum were all acquired. By Budd and Jensen's definition, a phylum is defined by a set of characters shared by all its living representatives.


This approach brings some small problems—for instance, ancestral characters common to most members of a phylum may have been lost by some members. Also, this definition is based on an arbitrary point of time: the present. However, as it is character based, it is easy to apply to the fossil record. A greater problem is that it relies on a subjective decision about which groups of organisms should be considered as phyla.


The approach is useful because it makes it easy to classify extinct organisms as "stem groups" to the phyla with which they bear the most resemblance, based only on the taxonomically important similarities.[8] However, proving that a fossil belongs to the crown group of a phylum is difficult, as it must display a character unique to a sub-set of the crown group.[8] Furthermore, organisms in the stem group of a phylum can possess the "body plan" of the phylum without all the characteristics necessary to fall within it. This weakens the idea that each of the phyla represents a distinct body plan.[11]


A classification using this definition may be strongly affected by the chance survival of rare groups, which can make a phylum much more diverse than it would be otherwise.[12]



Known phyla



Animals



Total numbers are estimates; figures from different authors vary wildly, not least because some are based on described species,[13] some on extrapolations to numbers of undescribed species. For instance, around 25,000–27,000 species of nematodes have been described, while published estimates of the total number of nematode species include 10,000–20,000; 500,000; 10 million; and 100 million.[14]













Protostome

Bilateria


Deuterostome

Basal/disputed

Others




















































































































































































PhylumMeaningCommon nameDistinguishing characteristicSpecies described

Acanthocephala
Thorny head
Thorny-headed worms[15]:278Reversible spiny proboscis that bears many rows of hooked spines

7003110000000000000♠approx. 1,100

Annelida
Little ring :306Segmented worms
Multiple circular segment
17,000 + extant

Arthropoda
Jointed foot

Segmented bodies and jointed limbs, with Chitin exoskeleton

7006125000000000000♠1,250,000+ extant;[13] 20,000+ extinct

Brachiopoda
Arm foot[15]:336Lampshells[15]:336
Lophophore and pedicle

7002300000000000000♠300-500 extant; 12,000+ extinct

Bryozoa
Moss animals
Moss animals, sea mats, ectoprocts[15]:332Lophophore, no pedicle, ciliated tentacles, anus outside ring of cilia

7003600000000000000♠6,000 extant[13]

Chaetognatha
Longhair jaw
Arrow worms[15]:342
Chitinous spines either side of head, fins

7002100000000000000♠approx. 100 extant

Chordata
With a cord
Chordates
Hollow dorsal nerve cord, notochord, pharyngeal slits, endostyle, post-anal tail

7004550000000000000♠approx. 55,000+[13]

Cnidaria
Stinging nettle
Cnidarians

Nematocysts (stinging cells)

7004160000000000000♠approx. 16,000[13]

Ctenophora
Comb bearer
Comb jellies[15]:256Eight "comb rows" of fused cilia

7002100000000000000♠approx. 100-150 extant

Cycliophora
Wheel carrying

Symbion
Circular mouth surrounded by small cilia, sac-like bodies

7000300000000000000♠3+

Echinodermata
Spiny skin
Echinoderms[15]:348Fivefold radial symmetry in living forms, mesodermal calcified spines

7003750000000000000♠approx. 7,500 extant;[13] approx. 13,000 extinct

Entoprocta
Inside anus[15]:292Goblet worms
Anus inside ring of cilia

7002150000000000000♠approx. 150

Gastrotricha
Hairy stomach[15]:288Gastrotrich worms
Two terminal adhesive tubes

7002690000000000000♠approx. 690

Gnathostomulida
Jaw orifice
Jaw worms[15]:260

7002100000000000000♠approx. 100

Hemichordata
Half cord[15]:344Acorn worms, hemichordates

Stomochord in collar, pharyngeal slits

7002130000000000000♠approx. 130 extant

Kinorhyncha
Motion snout
Mud dragons
Eleven segments, each with a dorsal plate

7002150000000000000♠approx. 150

Loricifera
Corset bearer
Brush heads
Umbrella-like scales at each end

7002122000000000000♠approx. 122

Micrognathozoa
Tiny jaw animals

Limnognathia

Accordion-like extensible thorax

7000100000000000000♠1

Mollusca
Soft[15]:320Mollusks / molluscs
Muscular foot and mantle round shell

7004850000000000000♠85,000+ extant;[13] 80,000+ extinct[16]

Nematoda
Thread like
Round worms, thread worms[15]:274Round cross section, keratin cuticle

7004250000000000000♠25,000[13]

Nematomorpha
Thread form[15]:276Horsehair worms, Gordian worms[15]:276

7002320000000000000♠approx. 320

Nemertea
A sea nymph[15]:270Ribbon worms, Rhynchocoela[15]:270

7003120000000000000♠approx. 1,200

Onychophora
Claw bearer
Velvet worms[15]:328Legs tipped by chitinous claws

7002200000000000000♠approx. 200 extant

Orthonectida
Straight swimming[15]:268Orthonectids[15]:268Single layer of ciliated cells surrounding a mass of sex cells

7001260000000000000♠approx. 26

Phoronida
Zeus's mistress
Horseshoe worms
U-shaped gut

7001110000000000000♠11

Placozoa
Plate animals
Trichoplaxes[15]:242Differentiated top and bottom surfaces, two ciliated cell layers, amoeboid fiber cells in between

7000100000000000000♠1

Platyhelminthes
Flat worm[15]:262Flatworms[15]:262

7004295000000000000♠approx. 29,500[13]

Porifera [a]
Pore bearer
Sponges[15]:246Perforated interior wall

7004108000000000000♠10,800 extant[13]

Priapulida
Little Priapus
Penis worms


7001200000000000000♠approx. 20

Rhombozoa
Lozenge animal
Rhombozoans[15]:264Single anteroposterior axial cell surrounded by ciliated cells

7002100000000000000♠100+

Rotifera
Wheel bearer
Rotifers[15]:282Anterior crown of cilia

7003200000000000000♠approx. 2,000[13]

Sipuncula
Small tube
Peanut worms
Mouth surrounded by invertible tentacles
144-320

Tardigrada
Slow step
Water bears
Four segmented body and head
1,000

Xenacoelomorpha
Strange form without gut


Bilaterian, but lacking typical bilaterian structures such as gut cavities, anuses, and circulatory systems[17]

7002400000000000000♠400+

Total: 34




1,525,000[13]


Plants



The kingdom Plantae is defined in various ways by different biologists (see Current definitions of Plantae). All definitions include the living embryophytes (land plants), to which may be added the two green algae divisions, Chlorophyta and Charophyta, to form the clade Viridiplantae. The table below follows the influential (though contentious) Cavalier-Smith system in equating "Plantae" with Archaeplastida,[18] a group containing Viridiplantae and the algal Rhodophyta and Glaucophyta divisions.


The definition and classification of plants at the division level also varies from source to source, and has changed progressively in recent years. Thus some sources place horsetails in division Arthrophyta and ferns in division Pteridophyta,[19] while others place them both in Pteridophyta, as shown below. The division Pinophyta may be used for all gymnosperms (i.e. including cycads, ginkgos and gnetophytes),[20] or for conifers alone as below.


Since the first publication of the APG system in 1998, which proposed a classification of angiosperms up to the level of orders, many sources have preferred to treat ranks higher than orders as informal clades. Where formal ranks have been provided, the traditional divisions listed below have been reduced to a very much lower level, e.g. subclasses.[21]











Land plants

Viridiplantae


Green algae

Other algae (Biliphyta)[18]















































































DivisionMeaningCommon nameDistinguishing characteristicsSpecies described

Anthocerotophyta[22]

Anthoceros-like plant
Hornworts
Horn-shaped sporophytes, no vascular system

7002100000000000000♠100-300+

Bryophyta[23]

Bryum-like plant, moss plant
Mosses
Persistent unbranched sporophytes, no vascular system

7004120000000000000♠approx. 12,000

Charophyta

Chara-like plant
Charophytes


7003100000000000000♠approx. 1,000

Chlorophyta
Yellow-green plant[15]:200Chlorophytes


7003700000000000000♠approx. 7,000

Cycadophyta[24]

Cycas-like plant, palm-like plant
Cycads
Seeds, crown of compound leaves

7002100000000000000♠approx. 100-200

Ginkgophyta[25]

Ginkgo-like plant
Ginkgo, maidenhair tree
Seeds not protected by fruit (single living species)

7000100000000000000♠only 1 extant; 50+ extinct

Glaucophyta
Blue-green plant
Glaucophytes


7001130000000000000♠13

Gnetophyta[26]

Gnetum-like plant
Gnetophytes
Seeds and woody vascular system with vessels

7001700000000000000♠approx. 70

Lycopodiophyta,[20]

Lycophyta[27]



Lycopodium-like plant

Wolf plant


Clubmosses & spikemosses

Microphyll leaves, vascular system

7003129000000000000♠1,290 extant

Magnoliophyta

Magnolia-like plant
Flowering plants, angiosperms
Flowers and fruit, vascular system with vessels

7005300000000000000♠300,000

Marchantiophyta,[28]

Hepatophyta[23]



Marchantia-like plant

Liver plant


Liverworts
Ephemeral unbranched sporophytes, no vascular system

7003900000000000000♠approx. 9,000

Pinophyta,[20]

Coniferophyta[29]



Pinus-like plant

Cone-bearing plant


Conifers
Cones containing seeds and wood composed of tracheids

7002629000000000000♠629 extant

Pteridophyta[citation needed]

Pteris-like plant, fern plant
Ferns & horsetails

Prothallus gametophytes, vascular system

7003900000000000000♠approx. 9,000 (not including lycophytes)

Rhodophyta
Rose plant
Red algae


7003700000000000000♠approx. 7,000

Total: 14




Fungi











































DivisionMeaningCommon nameDistinguishing characteristics

Ascomycota
Bladder fungus[15]:396Ascomycetes,[15]:396 sac fungi


Basidiomycota
Small base fungus[15]:402Basidiomycetes[15]:402

Blastocladiomycota
Offshoot branch fungus[30]Blastoclads


Chytridiomycota
Little cooking pot fungus[31]Chytrids


Glomeromycota
Ball of yarn fungus[15]:394Glomeromycetes, AM fungi[15]:394

Microsporidia
Small seeds[32]Microsporans[15]:390

Neocallimastigomycota
New beautiful whip fungus[33]Neocallimastigomycetes


Zygomycota
Pair fungus[15]:392Zygomycetes[15]:392

Total: 8



Phylum Microsporidia is generally included in kingdom Fungi, though its exact relations remain uncertain,[34] and it is considered a protozoan by the International Society of Protistologists[35] (see Protista, below). Molecular analysis of Zygomycota has found it to be polyphyletic (its members do not share an immediate ancestor),[36] which is considered undesirable by many biologists. Accordingly, there is a proposal to abolish the Zygomycota phylum. Its members would be divided between phylum Glomeromycota and four new subphyla incertae sedis (of uncertain placement): Entomophthoromycotina, Kickxellomycotina, Mucoromycotina, and Zoopagomycotina.[34]



Protista



Kingdom Protista (or Protoctista) is included in the traditional five- or six-kingdom model, where it can be defined as containing all eukaryotes that are not plants, animals, or fungi.[15]:120 Protista is a polyphyletic taxon[37] (it includes groups not directly related to one another), which is less acceptable to present-day biologists than in the past. Proposals have been made to divide it among several new kingdoms, such as Protozoa and Chromista in the Cavalier-Smith system.[38]


Protist taxonomy has long been unstable,[39] with different approaches and definitions resulting in many competing classification schemes. The phyla listed here are used for Chromista and Protozoa by the Catalogue of Life,[40] adapted from the system used by the International Society of Protistologists.[35]








Chromista


Protozoa












































































































Phylum/DivisionMeaningCommon nameDistinguishing characteristicsExample

Amoebozoa
Amorphous animal
Amoebas


Amoeba

Bigyra
Two ring




Cercozoa





Choanozoa
Funnel animal




Ciliophora
Cilia bearer
Ciliates


Paramecium

Cryptista





Euglenozoa
True eye animal



Euglena

Foraminifera
Hole bearers
Forams
Complex shells with one or more chambers
Forams

Haptophyta





Loukozoa
Groove animal




Metamonada




Giardia

Microsporidia
Small spore




Myzozoa
Suckling animal




Mycetozoa

Slime molds



Ochrophyta
Yellow plant
Diatoms

Diatoms

Oomycota
Egg fungus[15]:184Oomycetes



Percolozoa





Radiozoa
Ray animal
Radiolarians



Sarcomastigophora





Sulcozoa





Total: 20


The Catalogue of Life includes Rhodophyta and Glaucophyta in kingdom Plantae,[40] but other systems consider these phyla part of Protista.[41]



Bacteria



Currently there are 29 phyla accepted by List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN)[42]



  1. Acidobacteria, phenotipically diverse and mostly uncultured


  2. Actinobacteria, High-G+C Gram positive species


  3. Aquificae, only 14 thermophilic genera, deep branching

  4. Armatimonadetes

  5. Bacteroidetes


  6. Caldiserica, formerly candidate division OP5, Caldisericum exile is the sole representative


  7. Chlamydiae, only 6 genera


  8. Chlorobi, only 7 genera, green sulphur bacteria


  9. Chloroflexi, green non-sulphur bacteria


  10. Chrysiogenetes, only 3 genera (Chrysiogenes arsenatis, Desulfurispira natronophila, Desulfurispirillum alkaliphilum)


  11. Cyanobacteria, also known as the blue-green algae

  12. Deferribacteres


  13. Deinococcus-Thermus, Deinococcus radiodurans and Thermus aquaticus are "commonly known" species of this phyla

  14. Dictyoglomi


  15. Elusimicrobia, formerly candidate division Thermite Group 1

  16. Fibrobacteres


  17. Firmicutes, Low-G+C Gram positive species, such as the spore-formers Bacilli (aerobic) and Clostridia (anaerobic)

  18. Fusobacteria

  19. Gemmatimonadetes


  20. Lentisphaerae, formerly clade VadinBE97

  21. Nitrospira

  22. Planctomycetes


  23. Proteobacteria, the most known phyla, containing species such as Escherichia coli or Pseudomonas aeruginosa


  24. Spirochaetes, species include Borrelia burgdorferi, which causes Lyme disease

  25. Synergistetes


  26. Tenericutes, alternatively class Mollicutes in phylum Firmicutes (notable genus: Mycoplasma)

  27. Thermodesulfobacteria


  28. Thermotogae, deep branching

  29. Verrucomicrobia


Archaea



Currently there are 5 phyla accepted by List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN).[42]



  1. Crenarchaeota, second most common archaeal phylum


  2. Euryarchaeota, most common archaeal phylum

  3. Korarchaeota


  4. Nanoarchaeota, ultra-small symbiotes, single known species

  5. Thaumarchaeota


See also



  • Cladistics

  • Phylogenetics

  • Systematics

  • Taxonomy


Notes




  1. ^ Paraphyletic




References




  1. ^ ab McNeill, J.; et al., eds. (2012). International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code), Adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress Melbourne, Australia, July 2011 (electronic ed.). International Association for Plant Taxonomy. Retrieved 2017-05-14..mw-parser-output cite.citationfont-style:inherit.mw-parser-output .citation qquotes:"""""""'""'".mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-free abackground:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/65/Lock-green.svg/9px-Lock-green.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-registration abackground:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d6/Lock-gray-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-gray-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-subscription abackground:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/aa/Lock-red-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-red-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registrationcolor:#555.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription span,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration spanborder-bottom:1px dotted;cursor:help.mw-parser-output .cs1-ws-icon abackground:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4c/Wikisource-logo.svg/12px-Wikisource-logo.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center.mw-parser-output code.cs1-codecolor:inherit;background:inherit;border:inherit;padding:inherit.mw-parser-output .cs1-hidden-errordisplay:none;font-size:100%.mw-parser-output .cs1-visible-errorfont-size:100%.mw-parser-output .cs1-maintdisplay:none;color:#33aa33;margin-left:0.3em.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration,.mw-parser-output .cs1-formatfont-size:95%.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-left,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-leftpadding-left:0.2em.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-right,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-rightpadding-right:0.2em


  2. ^ "Life sciences". The American Heritage New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy (third ed.). Houghton Mifflin Company. 2005. Retrieved 2008-10-04. Phyla in the plant kingdom are frequently called divisions.


  3. ^ Berg, Linda R. (2 March 2007). Introductory Botany: Plants, People, and the Environment (2 ed.). Cengage Learning. p. 15. ISBN 9780534466695. Retrieved 2012-07-23.


  4. ^ Valentine 2004, p. 8.


  5. ^ Naik, V.N. (1984). Taxonomy of Angiosperms. Tata McGraw-Hill. p. 27. ISBN 9780074517888.


  6. ^ Collins AG, Valentine JW (2001). "Defining phyla: evolutionary pathways to metazoan body plans." Evol. Dev. 3: 432-442.


  7. ^ Valentine, James W. (2004). On the Origin of Phyla. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press. p. 7. ISBN 978-0-226-84548-7. Classifications of organisms in hierarchical systems were in use by the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Usually organisms were grouped according to their morphological similarities as perceived by those early workers, and those groups were then grouped according to their similarities, and so on, to form a hierarchy.


  8. ^ abcde Budd, G.E.; Jensen, S. (May 2000). "A critical reappraisal of the fossil record of the bilaterian phyla". Biological Reviews. 75 (2): 253–295. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.1999.tb00046.x. PMID 10881389. Retrieved 2007-05-26.


  9. ^ Rouse G.W. (2001). "A cladistic analysis of Siboglinidae Caullery, 1914 (Polychaeta, Annelida): formerly the phyla Pogonophora and Vestimentifera". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 132 (1): 55–80. doi:10.1006/zjls.2000.0263.


  10. ^ Pawlowski J, Montoya-Burgos JI, Fahrni JF, Wüest J, Zaninetti L (October 1996). "Origin of the Mesozoa inferred from 18S rRNA gene sequences". Mol. Biol. Evol. 13 (8): 1128–32. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025675. PMID 8865666.


  11. ^ Budd, G. E. (September 1998). "Arthropod body-plan evolution in the Cambrian with an example from anomalocaridid muscle". Lethaia. 31 (3): 197–210. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.1998.tb00508.x.


  12. ^ Briggs, D. E. G.; Fortey, R. A. (2005). "Wonderful strife: systematics, stem groups, and the phylogenetic signal of the Cambrian radiation". Paleobiology. 31 (2 (Suppl)): 94–112. doi:10.1666/0094-8373(2005)031[0094:WSSSGA]2.0.CO;2.


  13. ^ abcdefghijkl Zhang, Zhi-Qiang (2013-08-30). "Animal biodiversity: An update of classification and diversity in 2013. In: Zhang, Z.-Q. (Ed.) Animal Biodiversity: An Outline of Higher-level Classification and Survey of Taxonomic Richness (Addenda 2013)". Zootaxa. 3703 (1): 5. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.3703.1.3.


  14. ^ Felder, Darryl L.; Camp, David K. (2009). Gulf of Mexico Origin, Waters, and Biota: Biodiversity. Texas A&M University Press. p. 1111. ISBN 978-1-60344-269-5.


  15. ^ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzaaabacadaeafagahaiajakal Margulis, Lynn; Chapman, Michael J. (2009). Kingdoms and Domains (4th corrected ed.). London: Academic Press. ISBN 9780123736215.


  16. ^ Feldkamp, S. (2002) Modern Biology. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, USA. (pp. 725)


  17. ^ Cannon, J.T.; Vellutini, B.C.; Smith, J.; Ronquist, F.; Jondelius, U.; Hejnol, A. (4 February 2016). "Xenacoelomorpha is the sister group to Nephrozoa". Nature. 530 (7588): 89–93. doi:10.1038/nature16520. PMID 26842059.


  18. ^ ab Cavalier-Smith, Thomas (22 June 2004). "Only Six Kingdoms of Life". Proceedings: Biological Sciences. 271 (1545): 1251–1262. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2705. PMC 1691724. PMID 15306349.


  19. ^ Mauseth 2012, pp. 514, 517.


  20. ^ abc Cronquist, A.; A. Takhtajan; W. Zimmermann (April 1966). "On the higher taxa of Embryobionta". Taxon. 15 (4): 129–134. doi:10.2307/1217531. JSTOR 1217531.


  21. ^ Chase, Mark W. & Reveal, James L. (October 2009), "A phylogenetic classification of the land plants to accompany APG III", Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 161 (2): 122–127, doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.01002.x


  22. ^ Mauseth, James D. (2012). Botany : An Introduction to Plant Biology (5th ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Learning. ISBN 978-1-4496-6580-7. p. 489


  23. ^ ab Mauseth 2012, p. 489.


  24. ^ Mauseth 2012, p. 540.


  25. ^ Mauseth 2012, p. 542.


  26. ^ Mauseth 2012, p. 543.


  27. ^ Mauseth 2012, p. 509.


  28. ^ Crandall-Stotler, Barbara; Stotler, Raymond E. (2000). "Morphology and classification of the Marchantiophyta". In A. Jonathan Shaw & Bernard Goffinet (Eds.). Bryophyte Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 21. ISBN 978-0-521-66097-6.CS1 maint: Uses editors parameter (link)


  29. ^ Mauseth 2012, p. 535.


  30. ^ Holt, Jack R.; Iudica, Carlos A. (1 October 2016). "Blastocladiomycota". Diversity of Life. Susquehanna University. Retrieved 29 December 2016.


  31. ^ Holt, Jack R.; Iudica, Carlos A. (9 January 2014). "Chytridiomycota". Diversity of Life. Susquehanna University. Retrieved 29 December 2016.


  32. ^ Holt, Jack R.; Iudica, Carlos A. (12 March 2013). "Microsporidia". Diversity of Life. Susquehanna University. Retrieved 29 December 2016.


  33. ^ Holt, Jack R.; Iudica, Carlos A. (23 April 2013). "Neocallimastigomycota". Diversity of Life. Susquehanna University. Retrieved 29 December 2016.


  34. ^ ab Hibbett DS, Binder M, Bischoff JF, Blackwell M, Cannon PF, Eriksson OE, et al. (May 2007). "A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi" (PDF). Mycological Research. 111 (Pt 5): 509–47. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.626.9582. doi:10.1016/j.mycres.2007.03.004. PMID 17572334. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 March 2009.


  35. ^ ab Ruggiero, Michael A.; Gordon, Dennis P.; Orrell, Thomas M.; et al. (29 April 2015). "A Higher Level Classification of All Living Organisms". PLOS One. 10 (6): e0119248. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0119248. PMC 4418965. PMID 25923521.


  36. ^ White, Merlin M.; James, Timothy Y.; O'Donnell, Kerry; et al. (Nov–Dec 2006). "Phylogeny of the Zygomycota Based on Nuclear Ribosomal Sequence Data". Mycologia. 98 (6): 872–884. doi:10.1080/15572536.2006.11832617.


  37. ^ Hagen, Joel B. (January 2012). "Five Kingdoms, More or Less: Robert Whittaker and the Broad Classification of Organisms". BioScience. 62 (1): 67–74. doi:10.1525/bio.2012.62.1.11.


  38. ^ Blackwell, Will H.; Powell, Martha J. (June 1999). "Reconciling Kingdoms with Codes of Nomenclature: Is It Necessary?". Systematic Biology. 48 (2): 406–412. doi:10.1080/106351599260382.


  39. ^ Davis, R. A. (19 March 2012). "Kingdom PROTISTA". College of Mount St. Joseph. Retrieved 28 December 2016.


  40. ^ ab "Taxonomic tree". Catalogue of Life. 23 December 2016. Retrieved 28 December 2016.


  41. ^ Corliss, John O. (1984). "The Kingdom Protista and its 45 Phyla". BioSystems. 17 (2): 87–176. doi:10.1016/0303-2647(84)90003-0.


  42. ^ ab J.P. Euzéby. "List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature: Phyla". Retrieved 2016-12-28.



External links




  • Are phyla "real"? Is there really a well-defined "number of animal phyla" extant and in the fossil record?

  • Major Phyla Of Animals










Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?