Time synchronization of machines on LAN to GPS NTP server on the LAN

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








6















I have 4 computers on a LAN that need to have their system clocks closely synchronized within a ms or so if possible. I have just installed a GPS based time server (ESE-104A) on the LAN. At this point the LAN is connected to a router and the internet but the router will not be connected to the internet when operational.



In operation the whole system will be started when power is applied to the machines, NTP server, and router.



  1. How can I set Ubuntu to sync every so many minutes and calculate what the period should be?


  2. How can I get an idea of how long it takes to settle down and what the quality of the time keeping is?


  3. I found a reference, from around 2000 perhaps, that suggests that the hwclock should be synched from the system time only at shut down. Should I do this and how?


  4. What log files should I keep?


Here's the results of "ntpq -



 remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
*nts .M-@M-(^AM-R. 1 u 29 128 377 38.912 -7.739 7.195


Here's my ntp.conf (I use IPv4 only)



 driftfile /etc/ntp.drift

statistics loopstats peerstats clockstats
filegen loopstats file loopstats type day enable
filegen peerstats file peerstats type day enable
filegen clockstats file clockstats type day enable

server 192.168.1.210

restrict -4 default kod notrap nomodify nopeer noquery
restrict -6 default kod notrap nomodify nopeer noquery

restrict 127.0.0.1
restrict ::1









share|improve this question



















  • 1





    Welcome to SE, your question is very well thought out and asked, based on that there's no way you could be a SYSADMIN 8-).

    – slm
    Apr 20 '13 at 22:16











  • By saying I have a NTP server on the LAN I do not mean that it is a computer acting as a NTP server. It's an appliance that gets its time from GPS and makes it available to NTP requests through the NTP port.

    – Nate Lockwood
    Apr 21 '13 at 17:40











  • Thanks for the clarification. Given that I'd think either mine or Martin's answer would work OK for you. Probably would lean towards Martin's answer as the way to go if I was you.

    – slm
    Apr 21 '13 at 17:47

















6















I have 4 computers on a LAN that need to have their system clocks closely synchronized within a ms or so if possible. I have just installed a GPS based time server (ESE-104A) on the LAN. At this point the LAN is connected to a router and the internet but the router will not be connected to the internet when operational.



In operation the whole system will be started when power is applied to the machines, NTP server, and router.



  1. How can I set Ubuntu to sync every so many minutes and calculate what the period should be?


  2. How can I get an idea of how long it takes to settle down and what the quality of the time keeping is?


  3. I found a reference, from around 2000 perhaps, that suggests that the hwclock should be synched from the system time only at shut down. Should I do this and how?


  4. What log files should I keep?


Here's the results of "ntpq -



 remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
*nts .M-@M-(^AM-R. 1 u 29 128 377 38.912 -7.739 7.195


Here's my ntp.conf (I use IPv4 only)



 driftfile /etc/ntp.drift

statistics loopstats peerstats clockstats
filegen loopstats file loopstats type day enable
filegen peerstats file peerstats type day enable
filegen clockstats file clockstats type day enable

server 192.168.1.210

restrict -4 default kod notrap nomodify nopeer noquery
restrict -6 default kod notrap nomodify nopeer noquery

restrict 127.0.0.1
restrict ::1









share|improve this question



















  • 1





    Welcome to SE, your question is very well thought out and asked, based on that there's no way you could be a SYSADMIN 8-).

    – slm
    Apr 20 '13 at 22:16











  • By saying I have a NTP server on the LAN I do not mean that it is a computer acting as a NTP server. It's an appliance that gets its time from GPS and makes it available to NTP requests through the NTP port.

    – Nate Lockwood
    Apr 21 '13 at 17:40











  • Thanks for the clarification. Given that I'd think either mine or Martin's answer would work OK for you. Probably would lean towards Martin's answer as the way to go if I was you.

    – slm
    Apr 21 '13 at 17:47













6












6








6








I have 4 computers on a LAN that need to have their system clocks closely synchronized within a ms or so if possible. I have just installed a GPS based time server (ESE-104A) on the LAN. At this point the LAN is connected to a router and the internet but the router will not be connected to the internet when operational.



In operation the whole system will be started when power is applied to the machines, NTP server, and router.



  1. How can I set Ubuntu to sync every so many minutes and calculate what the period should be?


  2. How can I get an idea of how long it takes to settle down and what the quality of the time keeping is?


  3. I found a reference, from around 2000 perhaps, that suggests that the hwclock should be synched from the system time only at shut down. Should I do this and how?


  4. What log files should I keep?


Here's the results of "ntpq -



 remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
*nts .M-@M-(^AM-R. 1 u 29 128 377 38.912 -7.739 7.195


Here's my ntp.conf (I use IPv4 only)



 driftfile /etc/ntp.drift

statistics loopstats peerstats clockstats
filegen loopstats file loopstats type day enable
filegen peerstats file peerstats type day enable
filegen clockstats file clockstats type day enable

server 192.168.1.210

restrict -4 default kod notrap nomodify nopeer noquery
restrict -6 default kod notrap nomodify nopeer noquery

restrict 127.0.0.1
restrict ::1









share|improve this question
















I have 4 computers on a LAN that need to have their system clocks closely synchronized within a ms or so if possible. I have just installed a GPS based time server (ESE-104A) on the LAN. At this point the LAN is connected to a router and the internet but the router will not be connected to the internet when operational.



In operation the whole system will be started when power is applied to the machines, NTP server, and router.



  1. How can I set Ubuntu to sync every so many minutes and calculate what the period should be?


  2. How can I get an idea of how long it takes to settle down and what the quality of the time keeping is?


  3. I found a reference, from around 2000 perhaps, that suggests that the hwclock should be synched from the system time only at shut down. Should I do this and how?


  4. What log files should I keep?


Here's the results of "ntpq -



 remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
*nts .M-@M-(^AM-R. 1 u 29 128 377 38.912 -7.739 7.195


Here's my ntp.conf (I use IPv4 only)



 driftfile /etc/ntp.drift

statistics loopstats peerstats clockstats
filegen loopstats file loopstats type day enable
filegen peerstats file peerstats type day enable
filegen clockstats file clockstats type day enable

server 192.168.1.210

restrict -4 default kod notrap nomodify nopeer noquery
restrict -6 default kod notrap nomodify nopeer noquery

restrict 127.0.0.1
restrict ::1






ntp






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 18 at 3:59









Rui F Ribeiro

42.1k1484142




42.1k1484142










asked Apr 20 '13 at 19:04









Nate LockwoodNate Lockwood

1489




1489







  • 1





    Welcome to SE, your question is very well thought out and asked, based on that there's no way you could be a SYSADMIN 8-).

    – slm
    Apr 20 '13 at 22:16











  • By saying I have a NTP server on the LAN I do not mean that it is a computer acting as a NTP server. It's an appliance that gets its time from GPS and makes it available to NTP requests through the NTP port.

    – Nate Lockwood
    Apr 21 '13 at 17:40











  • Thanks for the clarification. Given that I'd think either mine or Martin's answer would work OK for you. Probably would lean towards Martin's answer as the way to go if I was you.

    – slm
    Apr 21 '13 at 17:47












  • 1





    Welcome to SE, your question is very well thought out and asked, based on that there's no way you could be a SYSADMIN 8-).

    – slm
    Apr 20 '13 at 22:16











  • By saying I have a NTP server on the LAN I do not mean that it is a computer acting as a NTP server. It's an appliance that gets its time from GPS and makes it available to NTP requests through the NTP port.

    – Nate Lockwood
    Apr 21 '13 at 17:40











  • Thanks for the clarification. Given that I'd think either mine or Martin's answer would work OK for you. Probably would lean towards Martin's answer as the way to go if I was you.

    – slm
    Apr 21 '13 at 17:47







1




1





Welcome to SE, your question is very well thought out and asked, based on that there's no way you could be a SYSADMIN 8-).

– slm
Apr 20 '13 at 22:16





Welcome to SE, your question is very well thought out and asked, based on that there's no way you could be a SYSADMIN 8-).

– slm
Apr 20 '13 at 22:16













By saying I have a NTP server on the LAN I do not mean that it is a computer acting as a NTP server. It's an appliance that gets its time from GPS and makes it available to NTP requests through the NTP port.

– Nate Lockwood
Apr 21 '13 at 17:40





By saying I have a NTP server on the LAN I do not mean that it is a computer acting as a NTP server. It's an appliance that gets its time from GPS and makes it available to NTP requests through the NTP port.

– Nate Lockwood
Apr 21 '13 at 17:40













Thanks for the clarification. Given that I'd think either mine or Martin's answer would work OK for you. Probably would lean towards Martin's answer as the way to go if I was you.

– slm
Apr 21 '13 at 17:47





Thanks for the clarification. Given that I'd think either mine or Martin's answer would work OK for you. Probably would lean towards Martin's answer as the way to go if I was you.

– slm
Apr 21 '13 at 17:47










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














Run ntpd on all machines. Set the server so that it gets its time from the gps receiver and point the other machines to the server. With iburst the clients will sync fast enough for your purposes.






share|improve this answer

























  • @sim I fell back to this solution but first I needed to disable apparmor in Ubuntu. It was restricting ntpd access to the drif file. Today the drift files appear to be up to date and the jitter is reasonable if not a bit higher that I'd like. Using tcpdump I see traffic on the LAN that I really don't understand but will work on that question later.

    – Nate Lockwood
    Apr 24 '13 at 17:46


















1














I've usually setup systems so that as part of their power up routine that they'd initially run ntpdate and get their time bootstrapped from the local time server just so they aren't initially wildly off. Then just start up ntpd using it's default options.



For example, at the end of the file: /etc/rc.local add the following line:



/etc/init.d/ntpd stop
ntpdate <local time server>
/etc/init.d/ntpd start


It's hacky but does the job. I found this thread on Server fault that discusses reasons for not turning NTP into Frankenstein's monster by making it do something it was never meant to do, mainly keep precise time.



If you're really bent on getting precise time I think you'd be better off with this: Precise Time Protocol. There is an open source project that has implemented the PTP protocol, aptly named The Linux PTP Project.






share|improve this answer

























  • ntpdate is not needed; ntpd can set the time at startup.

    – Martin Schröder
    Apr 21 '13 at 13:06











  • @Martin For about two minutes after start up the NTP appliance will not have a "lock" on a GPS satellite and will give its best estimate from its battery powered clock. Will I need to compensate for this?

    – Nate Lockwood
    Apr 21 '13 at 17:47






  • 1





    If you look at the iburst link that @Martin provided the first paragraph covers your question. ... "The iburst option does several checks quickly as soon as the daemon is started and whenever the server is unreachable if you have that in your configuration. The burst option does several checks quickly whenever the server is reachable."

    – slm
    Apr 21 '13 at 17:51












  • @MartinSchröder Between the two of you and a 10 year old Linux guide I'm starting to get a handle on this. Where, that is, what file starts ntpd on boot and is that the spot that ntpd is told how often to check the ntp server?

    – Nate Lockwood
    Apr 21 '13 at 20:59











  • @NateLockwood: ntpd checks the server as often as needed: You don't have to tell it the interval. Please read the FAQ. The startup of ntpd is handled by your OS - typically it should "just work".

    – Martin Schröder
    Apr 21 '13 at 21:45











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f73116%2ftime-synchronization-of-machines-on-lan-to-gps-ntp-server-on-the-lan%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














Run ntpd on all machines. Set the server so that it gets its time from the gps receiver and point the other machines to the server. With iburst the clients will sync fast enough for your purposes.






share|improve this answer

























  • @sim I fell back to this solution but first I needed to disable apparmor in Ubuntu. It was restricting ntpd access to the drif file. Today the drift files appear to be up to date and the jitter is reasonable if not a bit higher that I'd like. Using tcpdump I see traffic on the LAN that I really don't understand but will work on that question later.

    – Nate Lockwood
    Apr 24 '13 at 17:46















3














Run ntpd on all machines. Set the server so that it gets its time from the gps receiver and point the other machines to the server. With iburst the clients will sync fast enough for your purposes.






share|improve this answer

























  • @sim I fell back to this solution but first I needed to disable apparmor in Ubuntu. It was restricting ntpd access to the drif file. Today the drift files appear to be up to date and the jitter is reasonable if not a bit higher that I'd like. Using tcpdump I see traffic on the LAN that I really don't understand but will work on that question later.

    – Nate Lockwood
    Apr 24 '13 at 17:46













3












3








3







Run ntpd on all machines. Set the server so that it gets its time from the gps receiver and point the other machines to the server. With iburst the clients will sync fast enough for your purposes.






share|improve this answer















Run ntpd on all machines. Set the server so that it gets its time from the gps receiver and point the other machines to the server. With iburst the clients will sync fast enough for your purposes.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:13









Community

1




1










answered Apr 21 '13 at 13:10









Martin SchröderMartin Schröder

6501927




6501927












  • @sim I fell back to this solution but first I needed to disable apparmor in Ubuntu. It was restricting ntpd access to the drif file. Today the drift files appear to be up to date and the jitter is reasonable if not a bit higher that I'd like. Using tcpdump I see traffic on the LAN that I really don't understand but will work on that question later.

    – Nate Lockwood
    Apr 24 '13 at 17:46

















  • @sim I fell back to this solution but first I needed to disable apparmor in Ubuntu. It was restricting ntpd access to the drif file. Today the drift files appear to be up to date and the jitter is reasonable if not a bit higher that I'd like. Using tcpdump I see traffic on the LAN that I really don't understand but will work on that question later.

    – Nate Lockwood
    Apr 24 '13 at 17:46
















@sim I fell back to this solution but first I needed to disable apparmor in Ubuntu. It was restricting ntpd access to the drif file. Today the drift files appear to be up to date and the jitter is reasonable if not a bit higher that I'd like. Using tcpdump I see traffic on the LAN that I really don't understand but will work on that question later.

– Nate Lockwood
Apr 24 '13 at 17:46





@sim I fell back to this solution but first I needed to disable apparmor in Ubuntu. It was restricting ntpd access to the drif file. Today the drift files appear to be up to date and the jitter is reasonable if not a bit higher that I'd like. Using tcpdump I see traffic on the LAN that I really don't understand but will work on that question later.

– Nate Lockwood
Apr 24 '13 at 17:46













1














I've usually setup systems so that as part of their power up routine that they'd initially run ntpdate and get their time bootstrapped from the local time server just so they aren't initially wildly off. Then just start up ntpd using it's default options.



For example, at the end of the file: /etc/rc.local add the following line:



/etc/init.d/ntpd stop
ntpdate <local time server>
/etc/init.d/ntpd start


It's hacky but does the job. I found this thread on Server fault that discusses reasons for not turning NTP into Frankenstein's monster by making it do something it was never meant to do, mainly keep precise time.



If you're really bent on getting precise time I think you'd be better off with this: Precise Time Protocol. There is an open source project that has implemented the PTP protocol, aptly named The Linux PTP Project.






share|improve this answer

























  • ntpdate is not needed; ntpd can set the time at startup.

    – Martin Schröder
    Apr 21 '13 at 13:06











  • @Martin For about two minutes after start up the NTP appliance will not have a "lock" on a GPS satellite and will give its best estimate from its battery powered clock. Will I need to compensate for this?

    – Nate Lockwood
    Apr 21 '13 at 17:47






  • 1





    If you look at the iburst link that @Martin provided the first paragraph covers your question. ... "The iburst option does several checks quickly as soon as the daemon is started and whenever the server is unreachable if you have that in your configuration. The burst option does several checks quickly whenever the server is reachable."

    – slm
    Apr 21 '13 at 17:51












  • @MartinSchröder Between the two of you and a 10 year old Linux guide I'm starting to get a handle on this. Where, that is, what file starts ntpd on boot and is that the spot that ntpd is told how often to check the ntp server?

    – Nate Lockwood
    Apr 21 '13 at 20:59











  • @NateLockwood: ntpd checks the server as often as needed: You don't have to tell it the interval. Please read the FAQ. The startup of ntpd is handled by your OS - typically it should "just work".

    – Martin Schröder
    Apr 21 '13 at 21:45















1














I've usually setup systems so that as part of their power up routine that they'd initially run ntpdate and get their time bootstrapped from the local time server just so they aren't initially wildly off. Then just start up ntpd using it's default options.



For example, at the end of the file: /etc/rc.local add the following line:



/etc/init.d/ntpd stop
ntpdate <local time server>
/etc/init.d/ntpd start


It's hacky but does the job. I found this thread on Server fault that discusses reasons for not turning NTP into Frankenstein's monster by making it do something it was never meant to do, mainly keep precise time.



If you're really bent on getting precise time I think you'd be better off with this: Precise Time Protocol. There is an open source project that has implemented the PTP protocol, aptly named The Linux PTP Project.






share|improve this answer

























  • ntpdate is not needed; ntpd can set the time at startup.

    – Martin Schröder
    Apr 21 '13 at 13:06











  • @Martin For about two minutes after start up the NTP appliance will not have a "lock" on a GPS satellite and will give its best estimate from its battery powered clock. Will I need to compensate for this?

    – Nate Lockwood
    Apr 21 '13 at 17:47






  • 1





    If you look at the iburst link that @Martin provided the first paragraph covers your question. ... "The iburst option does several checks quickly as soon as the daemon is started and whenever the server is unreachable if you have that in your configuration. The burst option does several checks quickly whenever the server is reachable."

    – slm
    Apr 21 '13 at 17:51












  • @MartinSchröder Between the two of you and a 10 year old Linux guide I'm starting to get a handle on this. Where, that is, what file starts ntpd on boot and is that the spot that ntpd is told how often to check the ntp server?

    – Nate Lockwood
    Apr 21 '13 at 20:59











  • @NateLockwood: ntpd checks the server as often as needed: You don't have to tell it the interval. Please read the FAQ. The startup of ntpd is handled by your OS - typically it should "just work".

    – Martin Schröder
    Apr 21 '13 at 21:45













1












1








1







I've usually setup systems so that as part of their power up routine that they'd initially run ntpdate and get their time bootstrapped from the local time server just so they aren't initially wildly off. Then just start up ntpd using it's default options.



For example, at the end of the file: /etc/rc.local add the following line:



/etc/init.d/ntpd stop
ntpdate <local time server>
/etc/init.d/ntpd start


It's hacky but does the job. I found this thread on Server fault that discusses reasons for not turning NTP into Frankenstein's monster by making it do something it was never meant to do, mainly keep precise time.



If you're really bent on getting precise time I think you'd be better off with this: Precise Time Protocol. There is an open source project that has implemented the PTP protocol, aptly named The Linux PTP Project.






share|improve this answer















I've usually setup systems so that as part of their power up routine that they'd initially run ntpdate and get their time bootstrapped from the local time server just so they aren't initially wildly off. Then just start up ntpd using it's default options.



For example, at the end of the file: /etc/rc.local add the following line:



/etc/init.d/ntpd stop
ntpdate <local time server>
/etc/init.d/ntpd start


It's hacky but does the job. I found this thread on Server fault that discusses reasons for not turning NTP into Frankenstein's monster by making it do something it was never meant to do, mainly keep precise time.



If you're really bent on getting precise time I think you'd be better off with this: Precise Time Protocol. There is an open source project that has implemented the PTP protocol, aptly named The Linux PTP Project.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:13









Community

1




1










answered Apr 20 '13 at 23:24









slmslm

256k71544690




256k71544690












  • ntpdate is not needed; ntpd can set the time at startup.

    – Martin Schröder
    Apr 21 '13 at 13:06











  • @Martin For about two minutes after start up the NTP appliance will not have a "lock" on a GPS satellite and will give its best estimate from its battery powered clock. Will I need to compensate for this?

    – Nate Lockwood
    Apr 21 '13 at 17:47






  • 1





    If you look at the iburst link that @Martin provided the first paragraph covers your question. ... "The iburst option does several checks quickly as soon as the daemon is started and whenever the server is unreachable if you have that in your configuration. The burst option does several checks quickly whenever the server is reachable."

    – slm
    Apr 21 '13 at 17:51












  • @MartinSchröder Between the two of you and a 10 year old Linux guide I'm starting to get a handle on this. Where, that is, what file starts ntpd on boot and is that the spot that ntpd is told how often to check the ntp server?

    – Nate Lockwood
    Apr 21 '13 at 20:59











  • @NateLockwood: ntpd checks the server as often as needed: You don't have to tell it the interval. Please read the FAQ. The startup of ntpd is handled by your OS - typically it should "just work".

    – Martin Schröder
    Apr 21 '13 at 21:45

















  • ntpdate is not needed; ntpd can set the time at startup.

    – Martin Schröder
    Apr 21 '13 at 13:06











  • @Martin For about two minutes after start up the NTP appliance will not have a "lock" on a GPS satellite and will give its best estimate from its battery powered clock. Will I need to compensate for this?

    – Nate Lockwood
    Apr 21 '13 at 17:47






  • 1





    If you look at the iburst link that @Martin provided the first paragraph covers your question. ... "The iburst option does several checks quickly as soon as the daemon is started and whenever the server is unreachable if you have that in your configuration. The burst option does several checks quickly whenever the server is reachable."

    – slm
    Apr 21 '13 at 17:51












  • @MartinSchröder Between the two of you and a 10 year old Linux guide I'm starting to get a handle on this. Where, that is, what file starts ntpd on boot and is that the spot that ntpd is told how often to check the ntp server?

    – Nate Lockwood
    Apr 21 '13 at 20:59











  • @NateLockwood: ntpd checks the server as often as needed: You don't have to tell it the interval. Please read the FAQ. The startup of ntpd is handled by your OS - typically it should "just work".

    – Martin Schröder
    Apr 21 '13 at 21:45
















ntpdate is not needed; ntpd can set the time at startup.

– Martin Schröder
Apr 21 '13 at 13:06





ntpdate is not needed; ntpd can set the time at startup.

– Martin Schröder
Apr 21 '13 at 13:06













@Martin For about two minutes after start up the NTP appliance will not have a "lock" on a GPS satellite and will give its best estimate from its battery powered clock. Will I need to compensate for this?

– Nate Lockwood
Apr 21 '13 at 17:47





@Martin For about two minutes after start up the NTP appliance will not have a "lock" on a GPS satellite and will give its best estimate from its battery powered clock. Will I need to compensate for this?

– Nate Lockwood
Apr 21 '13 at 17:47




1




1





If you look at the iburst link that @Martin provided the first paragraph covers your question. ... "The iburst option does several checks quickly as soon as the daemon is started and whenever the server is unreachable if you have that in your configuration. The burst option does several checks quickly whenever the server is reachable."

– slm
Apr 21 '13 at 17:51






If you look at the iburst link that @Martin provided the first paragraph covers your question. ... "The iburst option does several checks quickly as soon as the daemon is started and whenever the server is unreachable if you have that in your configuration. The burst option does several checks quickly whenever the server is reachable."

– slm
Apr 21 '13 at 17:51














@MartinSchröder Between the two of you and a 10 year old Linux guide I'm starting to get a handle on this. Where, that is, what file starts ntpd on boot and is that the spot that ntpd is told how often to check the ntp server?

– Nate Lockwood
Apr 21 '13 at 20:59





@MartinSchröder Between the two of you and a 10 year old Linux guide I'm starting to get a handle on this. Where, that is, what file starts ntpd on boot and is that the spot that ntpd is told how often to check the ntp server?

– Nate Lockwood
Apr 21 '13 at 20:59













@NateLockwood: ntpd checks the server as often as needed: You don't have to tell it the interval. Please read the FAQ. The startup of ntpd is handled by your OS - typically it should "just work".

– Martin Schröder
Apr 21 '13 at 21:45





@NateLockwood: ntpd checks the server as often as needed: You don't have to tell it the interval. Please read the FAQ. The startup of ntpd is handled by your OS - typically it should "just work".

– Martin Schröder
Apr 21 '13 at 21:45

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f73116%2ftime-synchronization-of-machines-on-lan-to-gps-ntp-server-on-the-lan%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown






Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Bahrain

Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay