How does 取材で訪れた integrate into this sentence?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












1















The sentence in question:
取材で訪れたとある街で「きょうのラジオで近藤麻理恵が出ていたよね。最近“こんまり”している?」という会話が聞こえてきました。



For full context:
https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20190314/k10011847731000.html?utm_int=news_contents_tokushu_004



My attempt at translation:
"In a certain city, a conversation became audible (saying): 'Marie Kondo has vanished from nowadays radio, hasn't it? Recently, one makes/pronounces it 'Konmarie'?'...."



Now as you can see, I didn't translate 取材で訪れた at all here. That's because I just have no idea how to do it xD



"In a news article appeared" is how I would translate the phrase in isolation.
However, I'm already confused WHERE to connect it to, or how.
Making it a "direct" attribute to とある街 didn't make sense in my attempts to form a comprehensible sentence. If I just "added" it to とある町 it would kind of work up to a certain point:



"In a news article appeared in a certain town a conversation (saying): '...'" but it goes terribly wrong once it collides with 聞こえてきました since no conversation can become "audible" in a news article. At least I understood it as a news article without any audio/audio-video content but just in plain written language.



Making it a relative attribute feels wrong to me:
"In a news article, which appeared in a certain town...". I can only think of this as being grammatical if the whole 取材で訪れたとある街で can be regarded as some sort of adverbial which is only loosely attached to the '[quote]という会話' phrase. But even there I wonder if this can be correct, because it basically leaves us with the same problem as in the first attempt 'In a news article...the conversation became audible' which simply doesnt make much sense to me.
Furthermore, I wonder if it is grammatical to do:
取材で[relative attribute]
???
Because, well, I assume that 取材で is kind of an adverbial itself, isn't it? And having an adverbial like this being modified by a relative attribute...I don't know, as you can see I'm thoroughly confused and utterly clueless on this and request your help :D










share|improve this question






















  • 取材 does not mean "news article". 取材 is the act of collecting information/material for a news article or creative work of art (book, movie, game). Depending on what it is for, this could mean a variety of activities like conducting interviews, taking photos/recording video, doing investigative research, etc.

    – Setris
    Mar 18 at 0:36















1















The sentence in question:
取材で訪れたとある街で「きょうのラジオで近藤麻理恵が出ていたよね。最近“こんまり”している?」という会話が聞こえてきました。



For full context:
https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20190314/k10011847731000.html?utm_int=news_contents_tokushu_004



My attempt at translation:
"In a certain city, a conversation became audible (saying): 'Marie Kondo has vanished from nowadays radio, hasn't it? Recently, one makes/pronounces it 'Konmarie'?'...."



Now as you can see, I didn't translate 取材で訪れた at all here. That's because I just have no idea how to do it xD



"In a news article appeared" is how I would translate the phrase in isolation.
However, I'm already confused WHERE to connect it to, or how.
Making it a "direct" attribute to とある街 didn't make sense in my attempts to form a comprehensible sentence. If I just "added" it to とある町 it would kind of work up to a certain point:



"In a news article appeared in a certain town a conversation (saying): '...'" but it goes terribly wrong once it collides with 聞こえてきました since no conversation can become "audible" in a news article. At least I understood it as a news article without any audio/audio-video content but just in plain written language.



Making it a relative attribute feels wrong to me:
"In a news article, which appeared in a certain town...". I can only think of this as being grammatical if the whole 取材で訪れたとある街で can be regarded as some sort of adverbial which is only loosely attached to the '[quote]という会話' phrase. But even there I wonder if this can be correct, because it basically leaves us with the same problem as in the first attempt 'In a news article...the conversation became audible' which simply doesnt make much sense to me.
Furthermore, I wonder if it is grammatical to do:
取材で[relative attribute]
???
Because, well, I assume that 取材で is kind of an adverbial itself, isn't it? And having an adverbial like this being modified by a relative attribute...I don't know, as you can see I'm thoroughly confused and utterly clueless on this and request your help :D










share|improve this question






















  • 取材 does not mean "news article". 取材 is the act of collecting information/material for a news article or creative work of art (book, movie, game). Depending on what it is for, this could mean a variety of activities like conducting interviews, taking photos/recording video, doing investigative research, etc.

    – Setris
    Mar 18 at 0:36













1












1








1








The sentence in question:
取材で訪れたとある街で「きょうのラジオで近藤麻理恵が出ていたよね。最近“こんまり”している?」という会話が聞こえてきました。



For full context:
https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20190314/k10011847731000.html?utm_int=news_contents_tokushu_004



My attempt at translation:
"In a certain city, a conversation became audible (saying): 'Marie Kondo has vanished from nowadays radio, hasn't it? Recently, one makes/pronounces it 'Konmarie'?'...."



Now as you can see, I didn't translate 取材で訪れた at all here. That's because I just have no idea how to do it xD



"In a news article appeared" is how I would translate the phrase in isolation.
However, I'm already confused WHERE to connect it to, or how.
Making it a "direct" attribute to とある街 didn't make sense in my attempts to form a comprehensible sentence. If I just "added" it to とある町 it would kind of work up to a certain point:



"In a news article appeared in a certain town a conversation (saying): '...'" but it goes terribly wrong once it collides with 聞こえてきました since no conversation can become "audible" in a news article. At least I understood it as a news article without any audio/audio-video content but just in plain written language.



Making it a relative attribute feels wrong to me:
"In a news article, which appeared in a certain town...". I can only think of this as being grammatical if the whole 取材で訪れたとある街で can be regarded as some sort of adverbial which is only loosely attached to the '[quote]という会話' phrase. But even there I wonder if this can be correct, because it basically leaves us with the same problem as in the first attempt 'In a news article...the conversation became audible' which simply doesnt make much sense to me.
Furthermore, I wonder if it is grammatical to do:
取材で[relative attribute]
???
Because, well, I assume that 取材で is kind of an adverbial itself, isn't it? And having an adverbial like this being modified by a relative attribute...I don't know, as you can see I'm thoroughly confused and utterly clueless on this and request your help :D










share|improve this question














The sentence in question:
取材で訪れたとある街で「きょうのラジオで近藤麻理恵が出ていたよね。最近“こんまり”している?」という会話が聞こえてきました。



For full context:
https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20190314/k10011847731000.html?utm_int=news_contents_tokushu_004



My attempt at translation:
"In a certain city, a conversation became audible (saying): 'Marie Kondo has vanished from nowadays radio, hasn't it? Recently, one makes/pronounces it 'Konmarie'?'...."



Now as you can see, I didn't translate 取材で訪れた at all here. That's because I just have no idea how to do it xD



"In a news article appeared" is how I would translate the phrase in isolation.
However, I'm already confused WHERE to connect it to, or how.
Making it a "direct" attribute to とある街 didn't make sense in my attempts to form a comprehensible sentence. If I just "added" it to とある町 it would kind of work up to a certain point:



"In a news article appeared in a certain town a conversation (saying): '...'" but it goes terribly wrong once it collides with 聞こえてきました since no conversation can become "audible" in a news article. At least I understood it as a news article without any audio/audio-video content but just in plain written language.



Making it a relative attribute feels wrong to me:
"In a news article, which appeared in a certain town...". I can only think of this as being grammatical if the whole 取材で訪れたとある街で can be regarded as some sort of adverbial which is only loosely attached to the '[quote]という会話' phrase. But even there I wonder if this can be correct, because it basically leaves us with the same problem as in the first attempt 'In a news article...the conversation became audible' which simply doesnt make much sense to me.
Furthermore, I wonder if it is grammatical to do:
取材で[relative attribute]
???
Because, well, I assume that 取材で is kind of an adverbial itself, isn't it? And having an adverbial like this being modified by a relative attribute...I don't know, as you can see I'm thoroughly confused and utterly clueless on this and request your help :D







grammar






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 17 at 23:27









NarktorNarktor

2,9461417




2,9461417












  • 取材 does not mean "news article". 取材 is the act of collecting information/material for a news article or creative work of art (book, movie, game). Depending on what it is for, this could mean a variety of activities like conducting interviews, taking photos/recording video, doing investigative research, etc.

    – Setris
    Mar 18 at 0:36

















  • 取材 does not mean "news article". 取材 is the act of collecting information/material for a news article or creative work of art (book, movie, game). Depending on what it is for, this could mean a variety of activities like conducting interviews, taking photos/recording video, doing investigative research, etc.

    – Setris
    Mar 18 at 0:36
















取材 does not mean "news article". 取材 is the act of collecting information/material for a news article or creative work of art (book, movie, game). Depending on what it is for, this could mean a variety of activities like conducting interviews, taking photos/recording video, doing investigative research, etc.

– Setris
Mar 18 at 0:36





取材 does not mean "news article". 取材 is the act of collecting information/material for a news article or creative work of art (book, movie, game). Depending on what it is for, this could mean a variety of activities like conducting interviews, taking photos/recording video, doing investigative research, etc.

– Setris
Mar 18 at 0:36










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















7














取材で訪れる means "visit ~~ to collect data / gather material / for coverage / for an interview".



So 取材で訪れたとある街 means "a town that I visited to gather material" (取材で訪れた is a relative clause modifying とある街).




[取材で訪れた]とある街 -- a town [that I visited to gather material]

cf.

[仕事で訪れた]街 -- a town [that I visited on business]

[休暇で訪れた]街 -- a town [that I visited for vacation]




会話が聞こえてきました here means "I overheard a conversation".



「きょうのラジオで近藤麻理恵が出ていたよね。最近“こんまり”している?」

"Marie Kondo was on the radio today. Have you been KonMari-ing recently?"



 






share|improve this answer























  • で in 取材で is used in its "causative" meaning then, right? Like this, in a more literal translation: "a town that I visited because of data collection/collecting data"

    – Narktor
    Mar 18 at 9:29












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "257"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f66062%2fhow-does-%25e5%258f%2596%25e6%259d%2590%25e3%2581%25a7%25e8%25a8%25aa%25e3%2582%258c%25e3%2581%259f-integrate-into-this-sentence%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









7














取材で訪れる means "visit ~~ to collect data / gather material / for coverage / for an interview".



So 取材で訪れたとある街 means "a town that I visited to gather material" (取材で訪れた is a relative clause modifying とある街).




[取材で訪れた]とある街 -- a town [that I visited to gather material]

cf.

[仕事で訪れた]街 -- a town [that I visited on business]

[休暇で訪れた]街 -- a town [that I visited for vacation]




会話が聞こえてきました here means "I overheard a conversation".



「きょうのラジオで近藤麻理恵が出ていたよね。最近“こんまり”している?」

"Marie Kondo was on the radio today. Have you been KonMari-ing recently?"



 






share|improve this answer























  • で in 取材で is used in its "causative" meaning then, right? Like this, in a more literal translation: "a town that I visited because of data collection/collecting data"

    – Narktor
    Mar 18 at 9:29
















7














取材で訪れる means "visit ~~ to collect data / gather material / for coverage / for an interview".



So 取材で訪れたとある街 means "a town that I visited to gather material" (取材で訪れた is a relative clause modifying とある街).




[取材で訪れた]とある街 -- a town [that I visited to gather material]

cf.

[仕事で訪れた]街 -- a town [that I visited on business]

[休暇で訪れた]街 -- a town [that I visited for vacation]




会話が聞こえてきました here means "I overheard a conversation".



「きょうのラジオで近藤麻理恵が出ていたよね。最近“こんまり”している?」

"Marie Kondo was on the radio today. Have you been KonMari-ing recently?"



 






share|improve this answer























  • で in 取材で is used in its "causative" meaning then, right? Like this, in a more literal translation: "a town that I visited because of data collection/collecting data"

    – Narktor
    Mar 18 at 9:29














7












7








7







取材で訪れる means "visit ~~ to collect data / gather material / for coverage / for an interview".



So 取材で訪れたとある街 means "a town that I visited to gather material" (取材で訪れた is a relative clause modifying とある街).




[取材で訪れた]とある街 -- a town [that I visited to gather material]

cf.

[仕事で訪れた]街 -- a town [that I visited on business]

[休暇で訪れた]街 -- a town [that I visited for vacation]




会話が聞こえてきました here means "I overheard a conversation".



「きょうのラジオで近藤麻理恵が出ていたよね。最近“こんまり”している?」

"Marie Kondo was on the radio today. Have you been KonMari-ing recently?"



 






share|improve this answer













取材で訪れる means "visit ~~ to collect data / gather material / for coverage / for an interview".



So 取材で訪れたとある街 means "a town that I visited to gather material" (取材で訪れた is a relative clause modifying とある街).




[取材で訪れた]とある街 -- a town [that I visited to gather material]

cf.

[仕事で訪れた]街 -- a town [that I visited on business]

[休暇で訪れた]街 -- a town [that I visited for vacation]




会話が聞こえてきました here means "I overheard a conversation".



「きょうのラジオで近藤麻理恵が出ていたよね。最近“こんまり”している?」

"Marie Kondo was on the radio today. Have you been KonMari-ing recently?"



 







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Mar 18 at 0:14









ChocolateChocolate

48.9k461123




48.9k461123












  • で in 取材で is used in its "causative" meaning then, right? Like this, in a more literal translation: "a town that I visited because of data collection/collecting data"

    – Narktor
    Mar 18 at 9:29


















  • で in 取材で is used in its "causative" meaning then, right? Like this, in a more literal translation: "a town that I visited because of data collection/collecting data"

    – Narktor
    Mar 18 at 9:29

















で in 取材で is used in its "causative" meaning then, right? Like this, in a more literal translation: "a town that I visited because of data collection/collecting data"

– Narktor
Mar 18 at 9:29






で in 取材で is used in its "causative" meaning then, right? Like this, in a more literal translation: "a town that I visited because of data collection/collecting data"

– Narktor
Mar 18 at 9:29


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Japanese Language Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f66062%2fhow-does-%25e5%258f%2596%25e6%259d%2590%25e3%2581%25a7%25e8%25a8%25aa%25e3%2582%258c%25e3%2581%259f-integrate-into-this-sentence%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown






Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Bahrain

Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay