Does there exist a closed set which is an intersection of a collection of infinite open sets? [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












0












$begingroup$


Does there exist a closed set which is an intersection of a collection of infinite open sets?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by Eevee Trainer, Shalop, Shailesh, user21820, José Carlos Santos Mar 18 at 10:40


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Eevee Trainer, Shalop, Shailesh, user21820, José Carlos Santos
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Intersect $(-tfrac1n, tfrac1n)$ for $n = 1, 2, ldots$ and consider what set you get
    $endgroup$
    – Brevan Ellefsen
    Mar 18 at 5:52










  • $begingroup$
    Oh it will get $0$
    $endgroup$
    – Tony Tong
    Mar 18 at 5:57










  • $begingroup$
    @BrevanEllefsen: The question only asks for a "collection of infinite open sets", so just the singleton $(0,1)$ suffices. But Tony, please read how to ask a good question.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    Mar 18 at 9:23
















0












$begingroup$


Does there exist a closed set which is an intersection of a collection of infinite open sets?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by Eevee Trainer, Shalop, Shailesh, user21820, José Carlos Santos Mar 18 at 10:40


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Eevee Trainer, Shalop, Shailesh, user21820, José Carlos Santos
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Intersect $(-tfrac1n, tfrac1n)$ for $n = 1, 2, ldots$ and consider what set you get
    $endgroup$
    – Brevan Ellefsen
    Mar 18 at 5:52










  • $begingroup$
    Oh it will get $0$
    $endgroup$
    – Tony Tong
    Mar 18 at 5:57










  • $begingroup$
    @BrevanEllefsen: The question only asks for a "collection of infinite open sets", so just the singleton $(0,1)$ suffices. But Tony, please read how to ask a good question.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    Mar 18 at 9:23














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Does there exist a closed set which is an intersection of a collection of infinite open sets?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Does there exist a closed set which is an intersection of a collection of infinite open sets?







analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 18 at 8:39









YuiTo Cheng

2,43841037




2,43841037










asked Mar 18 at 5:50









Tony TongTony Tong

364




364




closed as off-topic by Eevee Trainer, Shalop, Shailesh, user21820, José Carlos Santos Mar 18 at 10:40


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Eevee Trainer, Shalop, Shailesh, user21820, José Carlos Santos
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by Eevee Trainer, Shalop, Shailesh, user21820, José Carlos Santos Mar 18 at 10:40


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Eevee Trainer, Shalop, Shailesh, user21820, José Carlos Santos
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Intersect $(-tfrac1n, tfrac1n)$ for $n = 1, 2, ldots$ and consider what set you get
    $endgroup$
    – Brevan Ellefsen
    Mar 18 at 5:52










  • $begingroup$
    Oh it will get $0$
    $endgroup$
    – Tony Tong
    Mar 18 at 5:57










  • $begingroup$
    @BrevanEllefsen: The question only asks for a "collection of infinite open sets", so just the singleton $(0,1)$ suffices. But Tony, please read how to ask a good question.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    Mar 18 at 9:23













  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Intersect $(-tfrac1n, tfrac1n)$ for $n = 1, 2, ldots$ and consider what set you get
    $endgroup$
    – Brevan Ellefsen
    Mar 18 at 5:52










  • $begingroup$
    Oh it will get $0$
    $endgroup$
    – Tony Tong
    Mar 18 at 5:57










  • $begingroup$
    @BrevanEllefsen: The question only asks for a "collection of infinite open sets", so just the singleton $(0,1)$ suffices. But Tony, please read how to ask a good question.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    Mar 18 at 9:23








8




8




$begingroup$
Intersect $(-tfrac1n, tfrac1n)$ for $n = 1, 2, ldots$ and consider what set you get
$endgroup$
– Brevan Ellefsen
Mar 18 at 5:52




$begingroup$
Intersect $(-tfrac1n, tfrac1n)$ for $n = 1, 2, ldots$ and consider what set you get
$endgroup$
– Brevan Ellefsen
Mar 18 at 5:52












$begingroup$
Oh it will get $0$
$endgroup$
– Tony Tong
Mar 18 at 5:57




$begingroup$
Oh it will get $0$
$endgroup$
– Tony Tong
Mar 18 at 5:57












$begingroup$
@BrevanEllefsen: The question only asks for a "collection of infinite open sets", so just the singleton $(0,1)$ suffices. But Tony, please read how to ask a good question.
$endgroup$
– user21820
Mar 18 at 9:23





$begingroup$
@BrevanEllefsen: The question only asks for a "collection of infinite open sets", so just the singleton $(0,1)$ suffices. But Tony, please read how to ask a good question.
$endgroup$
– user21820
Mar 18 at 9:23











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

$$mathbbRcapmathbbRcapmathbbRcapcdots$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    But R is an open set, the intersection is also R so it is still an open set
    $endgroup$
    – Tony Tong
    Mar 18 at 5:54







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    And also closed
    $endgroup$
    – Keen-ameteur
    Mar 18 at 5:55






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    While extremely simple, this example has the unfortunate side effect of also being open, which could further confound the OP who seems to be wondering why the intersection of open sets is not open in general (admittedly, the OP is probably also drawing a false dichotomy between open and closed sets, so I suppose this helps with that)
    $endgroup$
    – Brevan Ellefsen
    Mar 18 at 5:59











  • $begingroup$
    @BrevanEllefsen: +1, but I couldn't resist... :-)
    $endgroup$
    – parsiad
    Mar 18 at 6:00











  • $begingroup$
    (+1) That's a bad answer from the pedagogical point of view… but it's really funny too!
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Mar 18 at 6:56


















3












$begingroup$

As other answers and comments point out, this does indeed hold. In fact, every closed set in $mathbb R$ is a (countable) intersection of open sets. This holds in any metric space $(X,d)$. Here is a proof in the general metric case:



Suppose $Asubset X$ is closed. For each $n$, let
$$
U_n :=bigcup_ain A B(a,1/n).
$$

Note that $U_n$ is open (union of open sets). We claim that
$$
A = bigcap_ninmathbb N U_n.
$$

First note that $Asubset bigcap U_n$ since $Asubset U_n$ for each $n$ (by construction!). Also, if $xinbigcap U_n$, then for each $n$ we have some $a_n$ so that $xin B(a_n, 1/n)$, i.e. $d(x,a_n) < 1/n$ for each $n$. This implies that $a_nrightarrow x$ as $nrightarrowinfty$. Since $A$ is closed, it follows that $xin A$. QED.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



















    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8












    $begingroup$

    $$mathbbRcapmathbbRcapmathbbRcapcdots$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      But R is an open set, the intersection is also R so it is still an open set
      $endgroup$
      – Tony Tong
      Mar 18 at 5:54







    • 2




      $begingroup$
      And also closed
      $endgroup$
      – Keen-ameteur
      Mar 18 at 5:55






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      While extremely simple, this example has the unfortunate side effect of also being open, which could further confound the OP who seems to be wondering why the intersection of open sets is not open in general (admittedly, the OP is probably also drawing a false dichotomy between open and closed sets, so I suppose this helps with that)
      $endgroup$
      – Brevan Ellefsen
      Mar 18 at 5:59











    • $begingroup$
      @BrevanEllefsen: +1, but I couldn't resist... :-)
      $endgroup$
      – parsiad
      Mar 18 at 6:00











    • $begingroup$
      (+1) That's a bad answer from the pedagogical point of view… but it's really funny too!
      $endgroup$
      – José Carlos Santos
      Mar 18 at 6:56















    8












    $begingroup$

    $$mathbbRcapmathbbRcapmathbbRcapcdots$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      But R is an open set, the intersection is also R so it is still an open set
      $endgroup$
      – Tony Tong
      Mar 18 at 5:54







    • 2




      $begingroup$
      And also closed
      $endgroup$
      – Keen-ameteur
      Mar 18 at 5:55






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      While extremely simple, this example has the unfortunate side effect of also being open, which could further confound the OP who seems to be wondering why the intersection of open sets is not open in general (admittedly, the OP is probably also drawing a false dichotomy between open and closed sets, so I suppose this helps with that)
      $endgroup$
      – Brevan Ellefsen
      Mar 18 at 5:59











    • $begingroup$
      @BrevanEllefsen: +1, but I couldn't resist... :-)
      $endgroup$
      – parsiad
      Mar 18 at 6:00











    • $begingroup$
      (+1) That's a bad answer from the pedagogical point of view… but it's really funny too!
      $endgroup$
      – José Carlos Santos
      Mar 18 at 6:56













    8












    8








    8





    $begingroup$

    $$mathbbRcapmathbbRcapmathbbRcapcdots$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    $$mathbbRcapmathbbRcapmathbbRcapcdots$$







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Mar 18 at 5:53









    parsiadparsiad

    18.8k32554




    18.8k32554











    • $begingroup$
      But R is an open set, the intersection is also R so it is still an open set
      $endgroup$
      – Tony Tong
      Mar 18 at 5:54







    • 2




      $begingroup$
      And also closed
      $endgroup$
      – Keen-ameteur
      Mar 18 at 5:55






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      While extremely simple, this example has the unfortunate side effect of also being open, which could further confound the OP who seems to be wondering why the intersection of open sets is not open in general (admittedly, the OP is probably also drawing a false dichotomy between open and closed sets, so I suppose this helps with that)
      $endgroup$
      – Brevan Ellefsen
      Mar 18 at 5:59











    • $begingroup$
      @BrevanEllefsen: +1, but I couldn't resist... :-)
      $endgroup$
      – parsiad
      Mar 18 at 6:00











    • $begingroup$
      (+1) That's a bad answer from the pedagogical point of view… but it's really funny too!
      $endgroup$
      – José Carlos Santos
      Mar 18 at 6:56
















    • $begingroup$
      But R is an open set, the intersection is also R so it is still an open set
      $endgroup$
      – Tony Tong
      Mar 18 at 5:54







    • 2




      $begingroup$
      And also closed
      $endgroup$
      – Keen-ameteur
      Mar 18 at 5:55






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      While extremely simple, this example has the unfortunate side effect of also being open, which could further confound the OP who seems to be wondering why the intersection of open sets is not open in general (admittedly, the OP is probably also drawing a false dichotomy between open and closed sets, so I suppose this helps with that)
      $endgroup$
      – Brevan Ellefsen
      Mar 18 at 5:59











    • $begingroup$
      @BrevanEllefsen: +1, but I couldn't resist... :-)
      $endgroup$
      – parsiad
      Mar 18 at 6:00











    • $begingroup$
      (+1) That's a bad answer from the pedagogical point of view… but it's really funny too!
      $endgroup$
      – José Carlos Santos
      Mar 18 at 6:56















    $begingroup$
    But R is an open set, the intersection is also R so it is still an open set
    $endgroup$
    – Tony Tong
    Mar 18 at 5:54





    $begingroup$
    But R is an open set, the intersection is also R so it is still an open set
    $endgroup$
    – Tony Tong
    Mar 18 at 5:54





    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    And also closed
    $endgroup$
    – Keen-ameteur
    Mar 18 at 5:55




    $begingroup$
    And also closed
    $endgroup$
    – Keen-ameteur
    Mar 18 at 5:55




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    While extremely simple, this example has the unfortunate side effect of also being open, which could further confound the OP who seems to be wondering why the intersection of open sets is not open in general (admittedly, the OP is probably also drawing a false dichotomy between open and closed sets, so I suppose this helps with that)
    $endgroup$
    – Brevan Ellefsen
    Mar 18 at 5:59





    $begingroup$
    While extremely simple, this example has the unfortunate side effect of also being open, which could further confound the OP who seems to be wondering why the intersection of open sets is not open in general (admittedly, the OP is probably also drawing a false dichotomy between open and closed sets, so I suppose this helps with that)
    $endgroup$
    – Brevan Ellefsen
    Mar 18 at 5:59













    $begingroup$
    @BrevanEllefsen: +1, but I couldn't resist... :-)
    $endgroup$
    – parsiad
    Mar 18 at 6:00





    $begingroup$
    @BrevanEllefsen: +1, but I couldn't resist... :-)
    $endgroup$
    – parsiad
    Mar 18 at 6:00













    $begingroup$
    (+1) That's a bad answer from the pedagogical point of view… but it's really funny too!
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Mar 18 at 6:56




    $begingroup$
    (+1) That's a bad answer from the pedagogical point of view… but it's really funny too!
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Mar 18 at 6:56











    3












    $begingroup$

    As other answers and comments point out, this does indeed hold. In fact, every closed set in $mathbb R$ is a (countable) intersection of open sets. This holds in any metric space $(X,d)$. Here is a proof in the general metric case:



    Suppose $Asubset X$ is closed. For each $n$, let
    $$
    U_n :=bigcup_ain A B(a,1/n).
    $$

    Note that $U_n$ is open (union of open sets). We claim that
    $$
    A = bigcap_ninmathbb N U_n.
    $$

    First note that $Asubset bigcap U_n$ since $Asubset U_n$ for each $n$ (by construction!). Also, if $xinbigcap U_n$, then for each $n$ we have some $a_n$ so that $xin B(a_n, 1/n)$, i.e. $d(x,a_n) < 1/n$ for each $n$. This implies that $a_nrightarrow x$ as $nrightarrowinfty$. Since $A$ is closed, it follows that $xin A$. QED.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      3












      $begingroup$

      As other answers and comments point out, this does indeed hold. In fact, every closed set in $mathbb R$ is a (countable) intersection of open sets. This holds in any metric space $(X,d)$. Here is a proof in the general metric case:



      Suppose $Asubset X$ is closed. For each $n$, let
      $$
      U_n :=bigcup_ain A B(a,1/n).
      $$

      Note that $U_n$ is open (union of open sets). We claim that
      $$
      A = bigcap_ninmathbb N U_n.
      $$

      First note that $Asubset bigcap U_n$ since $Asubset U_n$ for each $n$ (by construction!). Also, if $xinbigcap U_n$, then for each $n$ we have some $a_n$ so that $xin B(a_n, 1/n)$, i.e. $d(x,a_n) < 1/n$ for each $n$. This implies that $a_nrightarrow x$ as $nrightarrowinfty$. Since $A$ is closed, it follows that $xin A$. QED.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        As other answers and comments point out, this does indeed hold. In fact, every closed set in $mathbb R$ is a (countable) intersection of open sets. This holds in any metric space $(X,d)$. Here is a proof in the general metric case:



        Suppose $Asubset X$ is closed. For each $n$, let
        $$
        U_n :=bigcup_ain A B(a,1/n).
        $$

        Note that $U_n$ is open (union of open sets). We claim that
        $$
        A = bigcap_ninmathbb N U_n.
        $$

        First note that $Asubset bigcap U_n$ since $Asubset U_n$ for each $n$ (by construction!). Also, if $xinbigcap U_n$, then for each $n$ we have some $a_n$ so that $xin B(a_n, 1/n)$, i.e. $d(x,a_n) < 1/n$ for each $n$. This implies that $a_nrightarrow x$ as $nrightarrowinfty$. Since $A$ is closed, it follows that $xin A$. QED.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        As other answers and comments point out, this does indeed hold. In fact, every closed set in $mathbb R$ is a (countable) intersection of open sets. This holds in any metric space $(X,d)$. Here is a proof in the general metric case:



        Suppose $Asubset X$ is closed. For each $n$, let
        $$
        U_n :=bigcup_ain A B(a,1/n).
        $$

        Note that $U_n$ is open (union of open sets). We claim that
        $$
        A = bigcap_ninmathbb N U_n.
        $$

        First note that $Asubset bigcap U_n$ since $Asubset U_n$ for each $n$ (by construction!). Also, if $xinbigcap U_n$, then for each $n$ we have some $a_n$ so that $xin B(a_n, 1/n)$, i.e. $d(x,a_n) < 1/n$ for each $n$. This implies that $a_nrightarrow x$ as $nrightarrowinfty$. Since $A$ is closed, it follows that $xin A$. QED.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Mar 18 at 7:04

























        answered Mar 18 at 6:59









        o.h.o.h.

        6917




        6917












            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Bahrain

            Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay