Why public is not mentioned as a fixed role in system database in SQL Server?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
5
down vote

favorite












While running



select * from sys.server_principals


for public role, in the column is_fixed_role is shown 0



enter image description hereenter image description here



But the documentation states that it is a fixed server role.
enter image description here



Documentation Link



Although it is stated that public is a little bit different from other roles because we can assign permissions to it. Anyway it is mentioned as a fixed role.



Can anyone explain this dilemma?










share|improve this question



















  • 2




    Just for clarity, sys.database_principals shows database level things like users, so when checking server level things like logins, you should check sys.server_principals. That won't help here though, because public is also marked as non-fixed there. I'm not sure that it matters - you can't really do anything with the public role whether it's truly fixed or not (e.g. I'm not sure if the docs are wrong or the view is, but I would just post a question on the documentation).
    – Aaron Bertrand♦
    Aug 31 at 14:11










  • Ok, thanks. I'll post there too
    – Eleonora Grigoryan
    Aug 31 at 14:14
















up vote
5
down vote

favorite












While running



select * from sys.server_principals


for public role, in the column is_fixed_role is shown 0



enter image description hereenter image description here



But the documentation states that it is a fixed server role.
enter image description here



Documentation Link



Although it is stated that public is a little bit different from other roles because we can assign permissions to it. Anyway it is mentioned as a fixed role.



Can anyone explain this dilemma?










share|improve this question



















  • 2




    Just for clarity, sys.database_principals shows database level things like users, so when checking server level things like logins, you should check sys.server_principals. That won't help here though, because public is also marked as non-fixed there. I'm not sure that it matters - you can't really do anything with the public role whether it's truly fixed or not (e.g. I'm not sure if the docs are wrong or the view is, but I would just post a question on the documentation).
    – Aaron Bertrand♦
    Aug 31 at 14:11










  • Ok, thanks. I'll post there too
    – Eleonora Grigoryan
    Aug 31 at 14:14












up vote
5
down vote

favorite









up vote
5
down vote

favorite











While running



select * from sys.server_principals


for public role, in the column is_fixed_role is shown 0



enter image description hereenter image description here



But the documentation states that it is a fixed server role.
enter image description here



Documentation Link



Although it is stated that public is a little bit different from other roles because we can assign permissions to it. Anyway it is mentioned as a fixed role.



Can anyone explain this dilemma?










share|improve this question















While running



select * from sys.server_principals


for public role, in the column is_fixed_role is shown 0



enter image description hereenter image description here



But the documentation states that it is a fixed server role.
enter image description here



Documentation Link



Although it is stated that public is a little bit different from other roles because we can assign permissions to it. Anyway it is mentioned as a fixed role.



Can anyone explain this dilemma?







sql-server role system-tables






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Sep 14 at 6:47

























asked Aug 31 at 14:04









Eleonora Grigoryan

31311




31311







  • 2




    Just for clarity, sys.database_principals shows database level things like users, so when checking server level things like logins, you should check sys.server_principals. That won't help here though, because public is also marked as non-fixed there. I'm not sure that it matters - you can't really do anything with the public role whether it's truly fixed or not (e.g. I'm not sure if the docs are wrong or the view is, but I would just post a question on the documentation).
    – Aaron Bertrand♦
    Aug 31 at 14:11










  • Ok, thanks. I'll post there too
    – Eleonora Grigoryan
    Aug 31 at 14:14












  • 2




    Just for clarity, sys.database_principals shows database level things like users, so when checking server level things like logins, you should check sys.server_principals. That won't help here though, because public is also marked as non-fixed there. I'm not sure that it matters - you can't really do anything with the public role whether it's truly fixed or not (e.g. I'm not sure if the docs are wrong or the view is, but I would just post a question on the documentation).
    – Aaron Bertrand♦
    Aug 31 at 14:11










  • Ok, thanks. I'll post there too
    – Eleonora Grigoryan
    Aug 31 at 14:14







2




2




Just for clarity, sys.database_principals shows database level things like users, so when checking server level things like logins, you should check sys.server_principals. That won't help here though, because public is also marked as non-fixed there. I'm not sure that it matters - you can't really do anything with the public role whether it's truly fixed or not (e.g. I'm not sure if the docs are wrong or the view is, but I would just post a question on the documentation).
– Aaron Bertrand♦
Aug 31 at 14:11




Just for clarity, sys.database_principals shows database level things like users, so when checking server level things like logins, you should check sys.server_principals. That won't help here though, because public is also marked as non-fixed there. I'm not sure that it matters - you can't really do anything with the public role whether it's truly fixed or not (e.g. I'm not sure if the docs are wrong or the view is, but I would just post a question on the documentation).
– Aaron Bertrand♦
Aug 31 at 14:11












Ok, thanks. I'll post there too
– Eleonora Grigoryan
Aug 31 at 14:14




Ok, thanks. I'll post there too
– Eleonora Grigoryan
Aug 31 at 14:14










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
5
down vote



accepted










One reason that I can think of why public is NOT a fixed role - is_fixed_role is that the permissions can be changed.



From BOL:




The permissions that are granted to the fixed server roles (except public) cannot be changed.



Only assign public permissions on any object when you want the object to be available to all users.



Note: public is implemented differently than other roles, and permissions can be granted, denied, or revoked from the public fixed server roles.




the other fixed server roles permissions cannot be changed.






share|improve this answer



























    up vote
    7
    down vote













    Public is just an odd duck.



    But to apply some retroactive continuity to the documentation you might say that all these built in roles are "fixed" or unchangeable in ways that normal roles are not. The roles marked as is_fixed_role have fixed permissions and changeable membership. Public has fixed membership (everyone) and changeable permissions.



    The column in sys.server_principals and sys.database_principals should be documented to clarify this.






    share|improve this answer




















      Your Answer







      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "182"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216417%2fwhy-public-is-not-mentioned-as-a-fixed-role-in-system-database-in-sql-server%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      5
      down vote



      accepted










      One reason that I can think of why public is NOT a fixed role - is_fixed_role is that the permissions can be changed.



      From BOL:




      The permissions that are granted to the fixed server roles (except public) cannot be changed.



      Only assign public permissions on any object when you want the object to be available to all users.



      Note: public is implemented differently than other roles, and permissions can be granted, denied, or revoked from the public fixed server roles.




      the other fixed server roles permissions cannot be changed.






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        5
        down vote



        accepted










        One reason that I can think of why public is NOT a fixed role - is_fixed_role is that the permissions can be changed.



        From BOL:




        The permissions that are granted to the fixed server roles (except public) cannot be changed.



        Only assign public permissions on any object when you want the object to be available to all users.



        Note: public is implemented differently than other roles, and permissions can be granted, denied, or revoked from the public fixed server roles.




        the other fixed server roles permissions cannot be changed.






        share|improve this answer






















          up vote
          5
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          5
          down vote



          accepted






          One reason that I can think of why public is NOT a fixed role - is_fixed_role is that the permissions can be changed.



          From BOL:




          The permissions that are granted to the fixed server roles (except public) cannot be changed.



          Only assign public permissions on any object when you want the object to be available to all users.



          Note: public is implemented differently than other roles, and permissions can be granted, denied, or revoked from the public fixed server roles.




          the other fixed server roles permissions cannot be changed.






          share|improve this answer












          One reason that I can think of why public is NOT a fixed role - is_fixed_role is that the permissions can be changed.



          From BOL:




          The permissions that are granted to the fixed server roles (except public) cannot be changed.



          Only assign public permissions on any object when you want the object to be available to all users.



          Note: public is implemented differently than other roles, and permissions can be granted, denied, or revoked from the public fixed server roles.




          the other fixed server roles permissions cannot be changed.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Aug 31 at 14:26









          Kin

          51.3k478181




          51.3k478181






















              up vote
              7
              down vote













              Public is just an odd duck.



              But to apply some retroactive continuity to the documentation you might say that all these built in roles are "fixed" or unchangeable in ways that normal roles are not. The roles marked as is_fixed_role have fixed permissions and changeable membership. Public has fixed membership (everyone) and changeable permissions.



              The column in sys.server_principals and sys.database_principals should be documented to clarify this.






              share|improve this answer
























                up vote
                7
                down vote













                Public is just an odd duck.



                But to apply some retroactive continuity to the documentation you might say that all these built in roles are "fixed" or unchangeable in ways that normal roles are not. The roles marked as is_fixed_role have fixed permissions and changeable membership. Public has fixed membership (everyone) and changeable permissions.



                The column in sys.server_principals and sys.database_principals should be documented to clarify this.






                share|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  7
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  7
                  down vote









                  Public is just an odd duck.



                  But to apply some retroactive continuity to the documentation you might say that all these built in roles are "fixed" or unchangeable in ways that normal roles are not. The roles marked as is_fixed_role have fixed permissions and changeable membership. Public has fixed membership (everyone) and changeable permissions.



                  The column in sys.server_principals and sys.database_principals should be documented to clarify this.






                  share|improve this answer












                  Public is just an odd duck.



                  But to apply some retroactive continuity to the documentation you might say that all these built in roles are "fixed" or unchangeable in ways that normal roles are not. The roles marked as is_fixed_role have fixed permissions and changeable membership. Public has fixed membership (everyone) and changeable permissions.



                  The column in sys.server_principals and sys.database_principals should be documented to clarify this.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Aug 31 at 14:26









                  David Browne - Microsoft

                  8,434622




                  8,434622



























                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded















































                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216417%2fwhy-public-is-not-mentioned-as-a-fixed-role-in-system-database-in-sql-server%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                      Bahrain

                      Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay