Why not “eminentissimus” and “reverendissimus”?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












5















When they announce a new pope the "Habemus Papam" text says "eminentissimum ac reverendissimum Dominum, Dominum
Why is it? Why isn't "eminentissimus ac reverendissimus dominus ?










share|improve this question



















  • 3





    Welcome to the site! Just to make a better-tailored answer, are you familiar with declensions?

    – Rafael
    Jan 24 at 12:32















5















When they announce a new pope the "Habemus Papam" text says "eminentissimum ac reverendissimum Dominum, Dominum
Why is it? Why isn't "eminentissimus ac reverendissimus dominus ?










share|improve this question



















  • 3





    Welcome to the site! Just to make a better-tailored answer, are you familiar with declensions?

    – Rafael
    Jan 24 at 12:32













5












5








5








When they announce a new pope the "Habemus Papam" text says "eminentissimum ac reverendissimum Dominum, Dominum
Why is it? Why isn't "eminentissimus ac reverendissimus dominus ?










share|improve this question
















When they announce a new pope the "Habemus Papam" text says "eminentissimum ac reverendissimum Dominum, Dominum
Why is it? Why isn't "eminentissimus ac reverendissimus dominus ?







ecclesiastical-latin case






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 24 at 17:17









Rafael

6,2722939




6,2722939










asked Jan 24 at 4:05









user22198user22198

563




563







  • 3





    Welcome to the site! Just to make a better-tailored answer, are you familiar with declensions?

    – Rafael
    Jan 24 at 12:32












  • 3





    Welcome to the site! Just to make a better-tailored answer, are you familiar with declensions?

    – Rafael
    Jan 24 at 12:32







3




3





Welcome to the site! Just to make a better-tailored answer, are you familiar with declensions?

– Rafael
Jan 24 at 12:32





Welcome to the site! Just to make a better-tailored answer, are you familiar with declensions?

– Rafael
Jan 24 at 12:32










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















6














I would say it's the same reason you see papam instead of papa above. That is, the whole thing is the direct object of habēmus.



In other words, the meaning is "we have a Pope, [we have a] most eminent and reverend…" and so on.






share|improve this answer






























    2














    The most important idea is already said by Draconis, but...



    In case you are not familiar with declensions, nouns, adjectives and some pronouns in Latin change their ending depending on their grammatical function, in an analogous way as verbs in English end in -ed to signify they are in past tense.



    In the example you give—Papam and dominum—, the -m ending means they are in the accusative case, i.e., they are objects to the verb, habemus. What do we have?—A Pope, Mr. Jorge Mario Card. Bergoglio. Eminentissimum and reverendissimum are adjectives modifying dominum, and hence must agree (they are also in accusative case)






    share|improve this answer
























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "644"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flatin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f8936%2fwhy-not-eminentissimus-and-reverendissimus%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      6














      I would say it's the same reason you see papam instead of papa above. That is, the whole thing is the direct object of habēmus.



      In other words, the meaning is "we have a Pope, [we have a] most eminent and reverend…" and so on.






      share|improve this answer



























        6














        I would say it's the same reason you see papam instead of papa above. That is, the whole thing is the direct object of habēmus.



        In other words, the meaning is "we have a Pope, [we have a] most eminent and reverend…" and so on.






        share|improve this answer

























          6












          6








          6







          I would say it's the same reason you see papam instead of papa above. That is, the whole thing is the direct object of habēmus.



          In other words, the meaning is "we have a Pope, [we have a] most eminent and reverend…" and so on.






          share|improve this answer













          I would say it's the same reason you see papam instead of papa above. That is, the whole thing is the direct object of habēmus.



          In other words, the meaning is "we have a Pope, [we have a] most eminent and reverend…" and so on.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Jan 24 at 4:45









          DraconisDraconis

          16k22068




          16k22068





















              2














              The most important idea is already said by Draconis, but...



              In case you are not familiar with declensions, nouns, adjectives and some pronouns in Latin change their ending depending on their grammatical function, in an analogous way as verbs in English end in -ed to signify they are in past tense.



              In the example you give—Papam and dominum—, the -m ending means they are in the accusative case, i.e., they are objects to the verb, habemus. What do we have?—A Pope, Mr. Jorge Mario Card. Bergoglio. Eminentissimum and reverendissimum are adjectives modifying dominum, and hence must agree (they are also in accusative case)






              share|improve this answer





























                2














                The most important idea is already said by Draconis, but...



                In case you are not familiar with declensions, nouns, adjectives and some pronouns in Latin change their ending depending on their grammatical function, in an analogous way as verbs in English end in -ed to signify they are in past tense.



                In the example you give—Papam and dominum—, the -m ending means they are in the accusative case, i.e., they are objects to the verb, habemus. What do we have?—A Pope, Mr. Jorge Mario Card. Bergoglio. Eminentissimum and reverendissimum are adjectives modifying dominum, and hence must agree (they are also in accusative case)






                share|improve this answer



























                  2












                  2








                  2







                  The most important idea is already said by Draconis, but...



                  In case you are not familiar with declensions, nouns, adjectives and some pronouns in Latin change their ending depending on their grammatical function, in an analogous way as verbs in English end in -ed to signify they are in past tense.



                  In the example you give—Papam and dominum—, the -m ending means they are in the accusative case, i.e., they are objects to the verb, habemus. What do we have?—A Pope, Mr. Jorge Mario Card. Bergoglio. Eminentissimum and reverendissimum are adjectives modifying dominum, and hence must agree (they are also in accusative case)






                  share|improve this answer















                  The most important idea is already said by Draconis, but...



                  In case you are not familiar with declensions, nouns, adjectives and some pronouns in Latin change their ending depending on their grammatical function, in an analogous way as verbs in English end in -ed to signify they are in past tense.



                  In the example you give—Papam and dominum—, the -m ending means they are in the accusative case, i.e., they are objects to the verb, habemus. What do we have?—A Pope, Mr. Jorge Mario Card. Bergoglio. Eminentissimum and reverendissimum are adjectives modifying dominum, and hence must agree (they are also in accusative case)







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Jan 24 at 23:28

























                  answered Jan 24 at 17:23









                  RafaelRafael

                  6,2722939




                  6,2722939



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Latin Language Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flatin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f8936%2fwhy-not-eminentissimus-and-reverendissimus%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown






                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                      Bahrain

                      Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay