Why don't similar matrices have same eigenvectors and eigenvalues?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












2














What is wrong with this proof:
Suppose R and T are similar operators and R has eigenvalue 2 for some eigenvector $v$.
By property of similar matrices:



$R=STS^-1$



Therefore:



$Rv = STS^-1v$



$2v = STS^-1v$



$2S^-1v = TS^-1v$



$2S^-1Sv = Tv$



$2Iv = Tv$



$Tv = 2v$



Thus $v$ is also an eigenvector of $T$ with eigenvalue 2.
Clearly this proof is incorrect, but where does it go wrong?










share|cite|improve this question

















  • 1




    Protip: if you're wondering why a calculation fails to be valid, and you know of a counterexample, try evaluating each step using your counterexample, and pick the first line where the two sides fail to be equal. Then you know that this step is the problem, and often the counterexample will show you why the step was problematic. You can use this technique to defeat every $-1 = 1$ fake proof out there!
    – Theo Bendit
    Dec 17 at 23:46















2














What is wrong with this proof:
Suppose R and T are similar operators and R has eigenvalue 2 for some eigenvector $v$.
By property of similar matrices:



$R=STS^-1$



Therefore:



$Rv = STS^-1v$



$2v = STS^-1v$



$2S^-1v = TS^-1v$



$2S^-1Sv = Tv$



$2Iv = Tv$



$Tv = 2v$



Thus $v$ is also an eigenvector of $T$ with eigenvalue 2.
Clearly this proof is incorrect, but where does it go wrong?










share|cite|improve this question

















  • 1




    Protip: if you're wondering why a calculation fails to be valid, and you know of a counterexample, try evaluating each step using your counterexample, and pick the first line where the two sides fail to be equal. Then you know that this step is the problem, and often the counterexample will show you why the step was problematic. You can use this technique to defeat every $-1 = 1$ fake proof out there!
    – Theo Bendit
    Dec 17 at 23:46













2












2








2


1





What is wrong with this proof:
Suppose R and T are similar operators and R has eigenvalue 2 for some eigenvector $v$.
By property of similar matrices:



$R=STS^-1$



Therefore:



$Rv = STS^-1v$



$2v = STS^-1v$



$2S^-1v = TS^-1v$



$2S^-1Sv = Tv$



$2Iv = Tv$



$Tv = 2v$



Thus $v$ is also an eigenvector of $T$ with eigenvalue 2.
Clearly this proof is incorrect, but where does it go wrong?










share|cite|improve this question













What is wrong with this proof:
Suppose R and T are similar operators and R has eigenvalue 2 for some eigenvector $v$.
By property of similar matrices:



$R=STS^-1$



Therefore:



$Rv = STS^-1v$



$2v = STS^-1v$



$2S^-1v = TS^-1v$



$2S^-1Sv = Tv$



$2Iv = Tv$



$Tv = 2v$



Thus $v$ is also an eigenvector of $T$ with eigenvalue 2.
Clearly this proof is incorrect, but where does it go wrong?







linear-algebra matrices eigenvalues-eigenvectors inverse






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 17 at 23:25









Justin Sanders

111




111







  • 1




    Protip: if you're wondering why a calculation fails to be valid, and you know of a counterexample, try evaluating each step using your counterexample, and pick the first line where the two sides fail to be equal. Then you know that this step is the problem, and often the counterexample will show you why the step was problematic. You can use this technique to defeat every $-1 = 1$ fake proof out there!
    – Theo Bendit
    Dec 17 at 23:46












  • 1




    Protip: if you're wondering why a calculation fails to be valid, and you know of a counterexample, try evaluating each step using your counterexample, and pick the first line where the two sides fail to be equal. Then you know that this step is the problem, and often the counterexample will show you why the step was problematic. You can use this technique to defeat every $-1 = 1$ fake proof out there!
    – Theo Bendit
    Dec 17 at 23:46







1




1




Protip: if you're wondering why a calculation fails to be valid, and you know of a counterexample, try evaluating each step using your counterexample, and pick the first line where the two sides fail to be equal. Then you know that this step is the problem, and often the counterexample will show you why the step was problematic. You can use this technique to defeat every $-1 = 1$ fake proof out there!
– Theo Bendit
Dec 17 at 23:46




Protip: if you're wondering why a calculation fails to be valid, and you know of a counterexample, try evaluating each step using your counterexample, and pick the first line where the two sides fail to be equal. Then you know that this step is the problem, and often the counterexample will show you why the step was problematic. You can use this technique to defeat every $-1 = 1$ fake proof out there!
– Theo Bendit
Dec 17 at 23:46










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4














When you went from
$$
2S^-1v=TS^-1v
$$

to
$$
2S^-1Sv=Tv
$$

you completely ignored the rules of matrix multiplcation; you cannot arbitrarily commute matrices in a product! It should have read as follows:
$$
2S^-1vS=TS^-1vS
$$

Also not that it is not even clear that this is well defined as written, since $v$ is probably a column vector.






share|cite|improve this answer




























    3














    Since the error in our OP Justin Sanders' argument has been thoroughly vetted in other answers, here I will directly address the title question.



    Similar matrices do have the same eigenvalues, to wit:



    if



    $B = PAP^-1, tag 1$



    then



    $B - lambda I = PAP^-1 - lambda I = PAP^-1 - lambda PIP^-1 = P(A - lambda I)P^-1, tag 2$



    whence



    $det(B - lambda I) = det(P(A - lambda I)P^-1) = det(P) det(A - lambda I) det (P^-1) = det(A - lambda I), tag 3$



    since $det(P^-1) = (det(P))^-1; tag 4$



    thus $A$ and $B$, having the same characteristic polynomials, also share the roots of these polynomials, i.e., their eigenvalues.



    However, similar matrices do not in general share eigenvectors; if



    $B vec v = lambda vec v, tag 5$



    then



    $PAP^-1 vec v = lambda vec v, tag 6$



    or



    $AP^-1 vec v = lambda P^-1 vec v, tag 7$



    that is, $P^-1 vec v$ is an eigenvector of $A$ corresponding to $lambda$; indeed, if $lambda$ is a root of (3) of multiplicity one, then $P^-1 vec v$ is, up to a scale factor, the eigenvector of $A$ associated with $lambda$. Since we can in general choose $P$ so that $P^-1 vec v ne vec v$, the eigenvectors will not be shared 'twixt' $A$ and $B$.



    So while the eigenvalues are similarity invariant, the eigenvectors transform according to $vec v mapsto P^-1 vec v$.






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      2














      It's wrong when you jump from $2S^-1v=TS^-1v$ to $2S^-1Sv=Tv$.






      share|cite|improve this answer




















        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        );
        );
        , "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044588%2fwhy-dont-similar-matrices-have-same-eigenvectors-and-eigenvalues%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        4














        When you went from
        $$
        2S^-1v=TS^-1v
        $$

        to
        $$
        2S^-1Sv=Tv
        $$

        you completely ignored the rules of matrix multiplcation; you cannot arbitrarily commute matrices in a product! It should have read as follows:
        $$
        2S^-1vS=TS^-1vS
        $$

        Also not that it is not even clear that this is well defined as written, since $v$ is probably a column vector.






        share|cite|improve this answer

























          4














          When you went from
          $$
          2S^-1v=TS^-1v
          $$

          to
          $$
          2S^-1Sv=Tv
          $$

          you completely ignored the rules of matrix multiplcation; you cannot arbitrarily commute matrices in a product! It should have read as follows:
          $$
          2S^-1vS=TS^-1vS
          $$

          Also not that it is not even clear that this is well defined as written, since $v$ is probably a column vector.






          share|cite|improve this answer























            4












            4








            4






            When you went from
            $$
            2S^-1v=TS^-1v
            $$

            to
            $$
            2S^-1Sv=Tv
            $$

            you completely ignored the rules of matrix multiplcation; you cannot arbitrarily commute matrices in a product! It should have read as follows:
            $$
            2S^-1vS=TS^-1vS
            $$

            Also not that it is not even clear that this is well defined as written, since $v$ is probably a column vector.






            share|cite|improve this answer












            When you went from
            $$
            2S^-1v=TS^-1v
            $$

            to
            $$
            2S^-1Sv=Tv
            $$

            you completely ignored the rules of matrix multiplcation; you cannot arbitrarily commute matrices in a product! It should have read as follows:
            $$
            2S^-1vS=TS^-1vS
            $$

            Also not that it is not even clear that this is well defined as written, since $v$ is probably a column vector.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Dec 17 at 23:28









            GenericMathMan

            511




            511





















                3














                Since the error in our OP Justin Sanders' argument has been thoroughly vetted in other answers, here I will directly address the title question.



                Similar matrices do have the same eigenvalues, to wit:



                if



                $B = PAP^-1, tag 1$



                then



                $B - lambda I = PAP^-1 - lambda I = PAP^-1 - lambda PIP^-1 = P(A - lambda I)P^-1, tag 2$



                whence



                $det(B - lambda I) = det(P(A - lambda I)P^-1) = det(P) det(A - lambda I) det (P^-1) = det(A - lambda I), tag 3$



                since $det(P^-1) = (det(P))^-1; tag 4$



                thus $A$ and $B$, having the same characteristic polynomials, also share the roots of these polynomials, i.e., their eigenvalues.



                However, similar matrices do not in general share eigenvectors; if



                $B vec v = lambda vec v, tag 5$



                then



                $PAP^-1 vec v = lambda vec v, tag 6$



                or



                $AP^-1 vec v = lambda P^-1 vec v, tag 7$



                that is, $P^-1 vec v$ is an eigenvector of $A$ corresponding to $lambda$; indeed, if $lambda$ is a root of (3) of multiplicity one, then $P^-1 vec v$ is, up to a scale factor, the eigenvector of $A$ associated with $lambda$. Since we can in general choose $P$ so that $P^-1 vec v ne vec v$, the eigenvectors will not be shared 'twixt' $A$ and $B$.



                So while the eigenvalues are similarity invariant, the eigenvectors transform according to $vec v mapsto P^-1 vec v$.






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  3














                  Since the error in our OP Justin Sanders' argument has been thoroughly vetted in other answers, here I will directly address the title question.



                  Similar matrices do have the same eigenvalues, to wit:



                  if



                  $B = PAP^-1, tag 1$



                  then



                  $B - lambda I = PAP^-1 - lambda I = PAP^-1 - lambda PIP^-1 = P(A - lambda I)P^-1, tag 2$



                  whence



                  $det(B - lambda I) = det(P(A - lambda I)P^-1) = det(P) det(A - lambda I) det (P^-1) = det(A - lambda I), tag 3$



                  since $det(P^-1) = (det(P))^-1; tag 4$



                  thus $A$ and $B$, having the same characteristic polynomials, also share the roots of these polynomials, i.e., their eigenvalues.



                  However, similar matrices do not in general share eigenvectors; if



                  $B vec v = lambda vec v, tag 5$



                  then



                  $PAP^-1 vec v = lambda vec v, tag 6$



                  or



                  $AP^-1 vec v = lambda P^-1 vec v, tag 7$



                  that is, $P^-1 vec v$ is an eigenvector of $A$ corresponding to $lambda$; indeed, if $lambda$ is a root of (3) of multiplicity one, then $P^-1 vec v$ is, up to a scale factor, the eigenvector of $A$ associated with $lambda$. Since we can in general choose $P$ so that $P^-1 vec v ne vec v$, the eigenvectors will not be shared 'twixt' $A$ and $B$.



                  So while the eigenvalues are similarity invariant, the eigenvectors transform according to $vec v mapsto P^-1 vec v$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer























                    3












                    3








                    3






                    Since the error in our OP Justin Sanders' argument has been thoroughly vetted in other answers, here I will directly address the title question.



                    Similar matrices do have the same eigenvalues, to wit:



                    if



                    $B = PAP^-1, tag 1$



                    then



                    $B - lambda I = PAP^-1 - lambda I = PAP^-1 - lambda PIP^-1 = P(A - lambda I)P^-1, tag 2$



                    whence



                    $det(B - lambda I) = det(P(A - lambda I)P^-1) = det(P) det(A - lambda I) det (P^-1) = det(A - lambda I), tag 3$



                    since $det(P^-1) = (det(P))^-1; tag 4$



                    thus $A$ and $B$, having the same characteristic polynomials, also share the roots of these polynomials, i.e., their eigenvalues.



                    However, similar matrices do not in general share eigenvectors; if



                    $B vec v = lambda vec v, tag 5$



                    then



                    $PAP^-1 vec v = lambda vec v, tag 6$



                    or



                    $AP^-1 vec v = lambda P^-1 vec v, tag 7$



                    that is, $P^-1 vec v$ is an eigenvector of $A$ corresponding to $lambda$; indeed, if $lambda$ is a root of (3) of multiplicity one, then $P^-1 vec v$ is, up to a scale factor, the eigenvector of $A$ associated with $lambda$. Since we can in general choose $P$ so that $P^-1 vec v ne vec v$, the eigenvectors will not be shared 'twixt' $A$ and $B$.



                    So while the eigenvalues are similarity invariant, the eigenvectors transform according to $vec v mapsto P^-1 vec v$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    Since the error in our OP Justin Sanders' argument has been thoroughly vetted in other answers, here I will directly address the title question.



                    Similar matrices do have the same eigenvalues, to wit:



                    if



                    $B = PAP^-1, tag 1$



                    then



                    $B - lambda I = PAP^-1 - lambda I = PAP^-1 - lambda PIP^-1 = P(A - lambda I)P^-1, tag 2$



                    whence



                    $det(B - lambda I) = det(P(A - lambda I)P^-1) = det(P) det(A - lambda I) det (P^-1) = det(A - lambda I), tag 3$



                    since $det(P^-1) = (det(P))^-1; tag 4$



                    thus $A$ and $B$, having the same characteristic polynomials, also share the roots of these polynomials, i.e., their eigenvalues.



                    However, similar matrices do not in general share eigenvectors; if



                    $B vec v = lambda vec v, tag 5$



                    then



                    $PAP^-1 vec v = lambda vec v, tag 6$



                    or



                    $AP^-1 vec v = lambda P^-1 vec v, tag 7$



                    that is, $P^-1 vec v$ is an eigenvector of $A$ corresponding to $lambda$; indeed, if $lambda$ is a root of (3) of multiplicity one, then $P^-1 vec v$ is, up to a scale factor, the eigenvector of $A$ associated with $lambda$. Since we can in general choose $P$ so that $P^-1 vec v ne vec v$, the eigenvectors will not be shared 'twixt' $A$ and $B$.



                    So while the eigenvalues are similarity invariant, the eigenvectors transform according to $vec v mapsto P^-1 vec v$.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Dec 18 at 0:09









                    Robert Lewis

                    43.6k22863




                    43.6k22863





















                        2














                        It's wrong when you jump from $2S^-1v=TS^-1v$ to $2S^-1Sv=Tv$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer

























                          2














                          It's wrong when you jump from $2S^-1v=TS^-1v$ to $2S^-1Sv=Tv$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer























                            2












                            2








                            2






                            It's wrong when you jump from $2S^-1v=TS^-1v$ to $2S^-1Sv=Tv$.






                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            It's wrong when you jump from $2S^-1v=TS^-1v$ to $2S^-1Sv=Tv$.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Dec 17 at 23:29









                            José Carlos Santos

                            149k22119221




                            149k22119221



























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded
















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044588%2fwhy-dont-similar-matrices-have-same-eigenvectors-and-eigenvalues%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown






                                Popular posts from this blog

                                How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                                Bahrain

                                Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay