Piping output of command to sed

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












-2














How would i pipe results of a command to sed without using '>>' so it appends that output to file?
What i want is something like this



command | sed -i "$command output" file









share|improve this question



















  • 2




    What are you trying to accomplish ?
    – don_crissti
    Dec 10 at 21:42






  • 2




    command | tee -a file or command >> file?
    – cryptarch
    Dec 10 at 21:45







  • 2




    yeah, this has been beaten to death...
    – don_crissti
    Dec 10 at 21:46






  • 3




    That's nonsense... There's a thing called noclobber if you're paranoid about accidentally overwriting files via redirection...
    – don_crissti
    Dec 10 at 22:01






  • 1




    Your post is a typical example of a XY question. Explain what are you trying to accomplish and why.
    – don_crissti
    Dec 10 at 22:07















-2














How would i pipe results of a command to sed without using '>>' so it appends that output to file?
What i want is something like this



command | sed -i "$command output" file









share|improve this question



















  • 2




    What are you trying to accomplish ?
    – don_crissti
    Dec 10 at 21:42






  • 2




    command | tee -a file or command >> file?
    – cryptarch
    Dec 10 at 21:45







  • 2




    yeah, this has been beaten to death...
    – don_crissti
    Dec 10 at 21:46






  • 3




    That's nonsense... There's a thing called noclobber if you're paranoid about accidentally overwriting files via redirection...
    – don_crissti
    Dec 10 at 22:01






  • 1




    Your post is a typical example of a XY question. Explain what are you trying to accomplish and why.
    – don_crissti
    Dec 10 at 22:07













-2












-2








-2







How would i pipe results of a command to sed without using '>>' so it appends that output to file?
What i want is something like this



command | sed -i "$command output" file









share|improve this question















How would i pipe results of a command to sed without using '>>' so it appends that output to file?
What i want is something like this



command | sed -i "$command output" file






io-redirection






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 10 at 21:57

























asked Dec 10 at 21:40









wedran

993




993







  • 2




    What are you trying to accomplish ?
    – don_crissti
    Dec 10 at 21:42






  • 2




    command | tee -a file or command >> file?
    – cryptarch
    Dec 10 at 21:45







  • 2




    yeah, this has been beaten to death...
    – don_crissti
    Dec 10 at 21:46






  • 3




    That's nonsense... There's a thing called noclobber if you're paranoid about accidentally overwriting files via redirection...
    – don_crissti
    Dec 10 at 22:01






  • 1




    Your post is a typical example of a XY question. Explain what are you trying to accomplish and why.
    – don_crissti
    Dec 10 at 22:07












  • 2




    What are you trying to accomplish ?
    – don_crissti
    Dec 10 at 21:42






  • 2




    command | tee -a file or command >> file?
    – cryptarch
    Dec 10 at 21:45







  • 2




    yeah, this has been beaten to death...
    – don_crissti
    Dec 10 at 21:46






  • 3




    That's nonsense... There's a thing called noclobber if you're paranoid about accidentally overwriting files via redirection...
    – don_crissti
    Dec 10 at 22:01






  • 1




    Your post is a typical example of a XY question. Explain what are you trying to accomplish and why.
    – don_crissti
    Dec 10 at 22:07







2




2




What are you trying to accomplish ?
– don_crissti
Dec 10 at 21:42




What are you trying to accomplish ?
– don_crissti
Dec 10 at 21:42




2




2




command | tee -a file or command >> file?
– cryptarch
Dec 10 at 21:45





command | tee -a file or command >> file?
– cryptarch
Dec 10 at 21:45





2




2




yeah, this has been beaten to death...
– don_crissti
Dec 10 at 21:46




yeah, this has been beaten to death...
– don_crissti
Dec 10 at 21:46




3




3




That's nonsense... There's a thing called noclobber if you're paranoid about accidentally overwriting files via redirection...
– don_crissti
Dec 10 at 22:01




That's nonsense... There's a thing called noclobber if you're paranoid about accidentally overwriting files via redirection...
– don_crissti
Dec 10 at 22:01




1




1




Your post is a typical example of a XY question. Explain what are you trying to accomplish and why.
– don_crissti
Dec 10 at 22:07




Your post is a typical example of a XY question. Explain what are you trying to accomplish and why.
– don_crissti
Dec 10 at 22:07










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














command | sed [sed commands] | tee -a FILE


Omitting the '-i' will use standard input for sed magic, the '-a' for tee will append sed's output to FILE instead of overwriting when used without -a






share|improve this answer






















  • I know this, but using >> is not recommended, as you can accidentally type > instead and overwrite the file.
    – wedran
    Dec 10 at 21:55







  • 1




    That's your reason for not using >>? If you don't want to type > accidentally then watch what you type. If you're that worried, back up the file before writing it. Sed won't stop you from shooting yourself in the foot.
    – cryptarch
    Dec 10 at 22:10










  • I'm having trouble getting command | sed "$command output" | tee -a FILE to do anything, because "$command output" is not defined. The entire thing is predicated on a misunderstanding of sed and shell variables and pipes. The answer could be improved by showing an explicit example demonstrating that sed really can be used in this way, and covers some use case which is not satisfied by simply command | tee -a FILE.
    – cryptarch
    Dec 10 at 22:25










Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f487219%2fpiping-output-of-command-to-sed%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














command | sed [sed commands] | tee -a FILE


Omitting the '-i' will use standard input for sed magic, the '-a' for tee will append sed's output to FILE instead of overwriting when used without -a






share|improve this answer






















  • I know this, but using >> is not recommended, as you can accidentally type > instead and overwrite the file.
    – wedran
    Dec 10 at 21:55







  • 1




    That's your reason for not using >>? If you don't want to type > accidentally then watch what you type. If you're that worried, back up the file before writing it. Sed won't stop you from shooting yourself in the foot.
    – cryptarch
    Dec 10 at 22:10










  • I'm having trouble getting command | sed "$command output" | tee -a FILE to do anything, because "$command output" is not defined. The entire thing is predicated on a misunderstanding of sed and shell variables and pipes. The answer could be improved by showing an explicit example demonstrating that sed really can be used in this way, and covers some use case which is not satisfied by simply command | tee -a FILE.
    – cryptarch
    Dec 10 at 22:25















0














command | sed [sed commands] | tee -a FILE


Omitting the '-i' will use standard input for sed magic, the '-a' for tee will append sed's output to FILE instead of overwriting when used without -a






share|improve this answer






















  • I know this, but using >> is not recommended, as you can accidentally type > instead and overwrite the file.
    – wedran
    Dec 10 at 21:55







  • 1




    That's your reason for not using >>? If you don't want to type > accidentally then watch what you type. If you're that worried, back up the file before writing it. Sed won't stop you from shooting yourself in the foot.
    – cryptarch
    Dec 10 at 22:10










  • I'm having trouble getting command | sed "$command output" | tee -a FILE to do anything, because "$command output" is not defined. The entire thing is predicated on a misunderstanding of sed and shell variables and pipes. The answer could be improved by showing an explicit example demonstrating that sed really can be used in this way, and covers some use case which is not satisfied by simply command | tee -a FILE.
    – cryptarch
    Dec 10 at 22:25













0












0








0






command | sed [sed commands] | tee -a FILE


Omitting the '-i' will use standard input for sed magic, the '-a' for tee will append sed's output to FILE instead of overwriting when used without -a






share|improve this answer














command | sed [sed commands] | tee -a FILE


Omitting the '-i' will use standard input for sed magic, the '-a' for tee will append sed's output to FILE instead of overwriting when used without -a







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Dec 10 at 22:48

























answered Dec 10 at 21:47









Jaleks

1,338422




1,338422











  • I know this, but using >> is not recommended, as you can accidentally type > instead and overwrite the file.
    – wedran
    Dec 10 at 21:55







  • 1




    That's your reason for not using >>? If you don't want to type > accidentally then watch what you type. If you're that worried, back up the file before writing it. Sed won't stop you from shooting yourself in the foot.
    – cryptarch
    Dec 10 at 22:10










  • I'm having trouble getting command | sed "$command output" | tee -a FILE to do anything, because "$command output" is not defined. The entire thing is predicated on a misunderstanding of sed and shell variables and pipes. The answer could be improved by showing an explicit example demonstrating that sed really can be used in this way, and covers some use case which is not satisfied by simply command | tee -a FILE.
    – cryptarch
    Dec 10 at 22:25
















  • I know this, but using >> is not recommended, as you can accidentally type > instead and overwrite the file.
    – wedran
    Dec 10 at 21:55







  • 1




    That's your reason for not using >>? If you don't want to type > accidentally then watch what you type. If you're that worried, back up the file before writing it. Sed won't stop you from shooting yourself in the foot.
    – cryptarch
    Dec 10 at 22:10










  • I'm having trouble getting command | sed "$command output" | tee -a FILE to do anything, because "$command output" is not defined. The entire thing is predicated on a misunderstanding of sed and shell variables and pipes. The answer could be improved by showing an explicit example demonstrating that sed really can be used in this way, and covers some use case which is not satisfied by simply command | tee -a FILE.
    – cryptarch
    Dec 10 at 22:25















I know this, but using >> is not recommended, as you can accidentally type > instead and overwrite the file.
– wedran
Dec 10 at 21:55





I know this, but using >> is not recommended, as you can accidentally type > instead and overwrite the file.
– wedran
Dec 10 at 21:55





1




1




That's your reason for not using >>? If you don't want to type > accidentally then watch what you type. If you're that worried, back up the file before writing it. Sed won't stop you from shooting yourself in the foot.
– cryptarch
Dec 10 at 22:10




That's your reason for not using >>? If you don't want to type > accidentally then watch what you type. If you're that worried, back up the file before writing it. Sed won't stop you from shooting yourself in the foot.
– cryptarch
Dec 10 at 22:10












I'm having trouble getting command | sed "$command output" | tee -a FILE to do anything, because "$command output" is not defined. The entire thing is predicated on a misunderstanding of sed and shell variables and pipes. The answer could be improved by showing an explicit example demonstrating that sed really can be used in this way, and covers some use case which is not satisfied by simply command | tee -a FILE.
– cryptarch
Dec 10 at 22:25




I'm having trouble getting command | sed "$command output" | tee -a FILE to do anything, because "$command output" is not defined. The entire thing is predicated on a misunderstanding of sed and shell variables and pipes. The answer could be improved by showing an explicit example demonstrating that sed really can be used in this way, and covers some use case which is not satisfied by simply command | tee -a FILE.
– cryptarch
Dec 10 at 22:25

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f487219%2fpiping-output-of-command-to-sed%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown






Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Bahrain

Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay