MOSFET W/L ratio limits: what's (un)reasonable?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












6














The answer to this question is probably process-dependent, but what are the limits of the W/L (gate width/gate length) ratio for MOSFETs?



I don't know what is in the realm of the insane. I saw a design example that ended up with transistors sized at 222/0.4 µm, which is a W/L of 555. That seems extremely high to me, but I have no professional design experience, only academic.










share|improve this question























  • Thank you for your responses! My particular application would be for analog/mixed-signal design, but it was nice to see the areas where differences could arise.
    – John Doe
    Dec 10 at 19:28















6














The answer to this question is probably process-dependent, but what are the limits of the W/L (gate width/gate length) ratio for MOSFETs?



I don't know what is in the realm of the insane. I saw a design example that ended up with transistors sized at 222/0.4 µm, which is a W/L of 555. That seems extremely high to me, but I have no professional design experience, only academic.










share|improve this question























  • Thank you for your responses! My particular application would be for analog/mixed-signal design, but it was nice to see the areas where differences could arise.
    – John Doe
    Dec 10 at 19:28













6












6








6


3





The answer to this question is probably process-dependent, but what are the limits of the W/L (gate width/gate length) ratio for MOSFETs?



I don't know what is in the realm of the insane. I saw a design example that ended up with transistors sized at 222/0.4 µm, which is a W/L of 555. That seems extremely high to me, but I have no professional design experience, only academic.










share|improve this question















The answer to this question is probably process-dependent, but what are the limits of the W/L (gate width/gate length) ratio for MOSFETs?



I don't know what is in the realm of the insane. I saw a design example that ended up with transistors sized at 222/0.4 µm, which is a W/L of 555. That seems extremely high to me, but I have no professional design experience, only academic.







mosfet integrated-circuit design






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 11 at 7:45









Peter Mortensen

1,58031422




1,58031422










asked Dec 10 at 18:03









John Doe

18313




18313











  • Thank you for your responses! My particular application would be for analog/mixed-signal design, but it was nice to see the areas where differences could arise.
    – John Doe
    Dec 10 at 19:28
















  • Thank you for your responses! My particular application would be for analog/mixed-signal design, but it was nice to see the areas where differences could arise.
    – John Doe
    Dec 10 at 19:28















Thank you for your responses! My particular application would be for analog/mixed-signal design, but it was nice to see the areas where differences could arise.
– John Doe
Dec 10 at 19:28




Thank you for your responses! My particular application would be for analog/mixed-signal design, but it was nice to see the areas where differences could arise.
– John Doe
Dec 10 at 19:28










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















10














It clearly depends on the application. Such ratios would be rare for digital designs, but they would be quite common for analog ones.



I have done low-noise AVLSI designs with 12 paralleled transistor fingers that add up to a 2280 µm/1.8 µm (that is >2 mm width in a 0.6 µm technology) i.e., W/L = 1266. And I would have gone bigger if size had not been one of the main optimization criteria. Note that these large transistors are actually operating in subthreshold with currents as low as 5 µA, and these transistor sizes were increased 50% from the previous design revision that had yield issues due to popcorn noise.



Even in digital designs you can see this. I vaguely remember an old processor in which the main visual feature was a central set of transistors used to drive the clock throughout the IC.






share|improve this answer






























    6














    Transistors that large are not unreasonable, particularly for high-current output pin drivers.



    Very wide transistors like this are usually constructed as many parallel fingers. Imagine a "comb" of polysilicon gates...the spaces between the comb fingers are the sources and drains, and they alternate so that a single source or drain is shared by two gate fingers. This reduces the effective capacitance of the source and drain. The other potential issue is the resistance of very long, narrow structures (whether they are source/drain diffusions or gate poly). Breaking the long transistor into many fingers helps to reduce the maximum resistance of any one of these structures.






    share|improve this answer




























      6














      To add to other answers, it's very typical to see $fracWL$ values on the order of 20-30k in higher-power analog/RF, where the end application is e.g. a power amplifier. A particular example involves a multi-finger transistor with a total periphery of 10.8mm on a 0.4$mu m$ process, which comes out to $fracWL = 27000$.



      The limits to reasonable/unreasonable are very dependent on the process and end-application. In the space of RF power transistors, typically the geometry of the die will limit the total number of fingers (packaging, handling, and mechanical stress constraints put practical limits on the aspect ratio of die). In addition, at RF frequencies, the phasing of the signal entering the transistor will also limit the effectiveness of a transistor with a very large aspect ratio. This will in turn put an effective upper limit on $fracWL$, but since the length is process dependent, so is this limit.






      share|improve this answer






























        5














        You'll find switching regulators with onchip MOSFET switching devices, designed to switch amps, over process and temperature and VDD variations. Even 10,000:1 width/length is used for such purposes. Of course the gate capacitance has become huge.



        Regarding the opposite, using the channel as a resistor, or as part of a matched pair for linear voltage-to-current converters in a phase-locked-detector, I've used 1:200 (width/length).






        share|improve this answer






















          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
          StackExchange.schematics.init();
          );
          , "cicuitlab");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "135"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f411540%2fmosfet-w-l-ratio-limits-whats-unreasonable%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes








          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          10














          It clearly depends on the application. Such ratios would be rare for digital designs, but they would be quite common for analog ones.



          I have done low-noise AVLSI designs with 12 paralleled transistor fingers that add up to a 2280 µm/1.8 µm (that is >2 mm width in a 0.6 µm technology) i.e., W/L = 1266. And I would have gone bigger if size had not been one of the main optimization criteria. Note that these large transistors are actually operating in subthreshold with currents as low as 5 µA, and these transistor sizes were increased 50% from the previous design revision that had yield issues due to popcorn noise.



          Even in digital designs you can see this. I vaguely remember an old processor in which the main visual feature was a central set of transistors used to drive the clock throughout the IC.






          share|improve this answer



























            10














            It clearly depends on the application. Such ratios would be rare for digital designs, but they would be quite common for analog ones.



            I have done low-noise AVLSI designs with 12 paralleled transistor fingers that add up to a 2280 µm/1.8 µm (that is >2 mm width in a 0.6 µm technology) i.e., W/L = 1266. And I would have gone bigger if size had not been one of the main optimization criteria. Note that these large transistors are actually operating in subthreshold with currents as low as 5 µA, and these transistor sizes were increased 50% from the previous design revision that had yield issues due to popcorn noise.



            Even in digital designs you can see this. I vaguely remember an old processor in which the main visual feature was a central set of transistors used to drive the clock throughout the IC.






            share|improve this answer

























              10












              10








              10






              It clearly depends on the application. Such ratios would be rare for digital designs, but they would be quite common for analog ones.



              I have done low-noise AVLSI designs with 12 paralleled transistor fingers that add up to a 2280 µm/1.8 µm (that is >2 mm width in a 0.6 µm technology) i.e., W/L = 1266. And I would have gone bigger if size had not been one of the main optimization criteria. Note that these large transistors are actually operating in subthreshold with currents as low as 5 µA, and these transistor sizes were increased 50% from the previous design revision that had yield issues due to popcorn noise.



              Even in digital designs you can see this. I vaguely remember an old processor in which the main visual feature was a central set of transistors used to drive the clock throughout the IC.






              share|improve this answer














              It clearly depends on the application. Such ratios would be rare for digital designs, but they would be quite common for analog ones.



              I have done low-noise AVLSI designs with 12 paralleled transistor fingers that add up to a 2280 µm/1.8 µm (that is >2 mm width in a 0.6 µm technology) i.e., W/L = 1266. And I would have gone bigger if size had not been one of the main optimization criteria. Note that these large transistors are actually operating in subthreshold with currents as low as 5 µA, and these transistor sizes were increased 50% from the previous design revision that had yield issues due to popcorn noise.



              Even in digital designs you can see this. I vaguely remember an old processor in which the main visual feature was a central set of transistors used to drive the clock throughout the IC.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Dec 11 at 7:45









              Peter Mortensen

              1,58031422




              1,58031422










              answered Dec 10 at 18:31









              Edgar Brown

              3,104425




              3,104425























                  6














                  Transistors that large are not unreasonable, particularly for high-current output pin drivers.



                  Very wide transistors like this are usually constructed as many parallel fingers. Imagine a "comb" of polysilicon gates...the spaces between the comb fingers are the sources and drains, and they alternate so that a single source or drain is shared by two gate fingers. This reduces the effective capacitance of the source and drain. The other potential issue is the resistance of very long, narrow structures (whether they are source/drain diffusions or gate poly). Breaking the long transistor into many fingers helps to reduce the maximum resistance of any one of these structures.






                  share|improve this answer

























                    6














                    Transistors that large are not unreasonable, particularly for high-current output pin drivers.



                    Very wide transistors like this are usually constructed as many parallel fingers. Imagine a "comb" of polysilicon gates...the spaces between the comb fingers are the sources and drains, and they alternate so that a single source or drain is shared by two gate fingers. This reduces the effective capacitance of the source and drain. The other potential issue is the resistance of very long, narrow structures (whether they are source/drain diffusions or gate poly). Breaking the long transistor into many fingers helps to reduce the maximum resistance of any one of these structures.






                    share|improve this answer























                      6












                      6








                      6






                      Transistors that large are not unreasonable, particularly for high-current output pin drivers.



                      Very wide transistors like this are usually constructed as many parallel fingers. Imagine a "comb" of polysilicon gates...the spaces between the comb fingers are the sources and drains, and they alternate so that a single source or drain is shared by two gate fingers. This reduces the effective capacitance of the source and drain. The other potential issue is the resistance of very long, narrow structures (whether they are source/drain diffusions or gate poly). Breaking the long transistor into many fingers helps to reduce the maximum resistance of any one of these structures.






                      share|improve this answer












                      Transistors that large are not unreasonable, particularly for high-current output pin drivers.



                      Very wide transistors like this are usually constructed as many parallel fingers. Imagine a "comb" of polysilicon gates...the spaces between the comb fingers are the sources and drains, and they alternate so that a single source or drain is shared by two gate fingers. This reduces the effective capacitance of the source and drain. The other potential issue is the resistance of very long, narrow structures (whether they are source/drain diffusions or gate poly). Breaking the long transistor into many fingers helps to reduce the maximum resistance of any one of these structures.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Dec 10 at 18:13









                      Elliot Alderson

                      4,6661918




                      4,6661918





















                          6














                          To add to other answers, it's very typical to see $fracWL$ values on the order of 20-30k in higher-power analog/RF, where the end application is e.g. a power amplifier. A particular example involves a multi-finger transistor with a total periphery of 10.8mm on a 0.4$mu m$ process, which comes out to $fracWL = 27000$.



                          The limits to reasonable/unreasonable are very dependent on the process and end-application. In the space of RF power transistors, typically the geometry of the die will limit the total number of fingers (packaging, handling, and mechanical stress constraints put practical limits on the aspect ratio of die). In addition, at RF frequencies, the phasing of the signal entering the transistor will also limit the effectiveness of a transistor with a very large aspect ratio. This will in turn put an effective upper limit on $fracWL$, but since the length is process dependent, so is this limit.






                          share|improve this answer



























                            6














                            To add to other answers, it's very typical to see $fracWL$ values on the order of 20-30k in higher-power analog/RF, where the end application is e.g. a power amplifier. A particular example involves a multi-finger transistor with a total periphery of 10.8mm on a 0.4$mu m$ process, which comes out to $fracWL = 27000$.



                            The limits to reasonable/unreasonable are very dependent on the process and end-application. In the space of RF power transistors, typically the geometry of the die will limit the total number of fingers (packaging, handling, and mechanical stress constraints put practical limits on the aspect ratio of die). In addition, at RF frequencies, the phasing of the signal entering the transistor will also limit the effectiveness of a transistor with a very large aspect ratio. This will in turn put an effective upper limit on $fracWL$, but since the length is process dependent, so is this limit.






                            share|improve this answer

























                              6












                              6








                              6






                              To add to other answers, it's very typical to see $fracWL$ values on the order of 20-30k in higher-power analog/RF, where the end application is e.g. a power amplifier. A particular example involves a multi-finger transistor with a total periphery of 10.8mm on a 0.4$mu m$ process, which comes out to $fracWL = 27000$.



                              The limits to reasonable/unreasonable are very dependent on the process and end-application. In the space of RF power transistors, typically the geometry of the die will limit the total number of fingers (packaging, handling, and mechanical stress constraints put practical limits on the aspect ratio of die). In addition, at RF frequencies, the phasing of the signal entering the transistor will also limit the effectiveness of a transistor with a very large aspect ratio. This will in turn put an effective upper limit on $fracWL$, but since the length is process dependent, so is this limit.






                              share|improve this answer














                              To add to other answers, it's very typical to see $fracWL$ values on the order of 20-30k in higher-power analog/RF, where the end application is e.g. a power amplifier. A particular example involves a multi-finger transistor with a total periphery of 10.8mm on a 0.4$mu m$ process, which comes out to $fracWL = 27000$.



                              The limits to reasonable/unreasonable are very dependent on the process and end-application. In the space of RF power transistors, typically the geometry of the die will limit the total number of fingers (packaging, handling, and mechanical stress constraints put practical limits on the aspect ratio of die). In addition, at RF frequencies, the phasing of the signal entering the transistor will also limit the effectiveness of a transistor with a very large aspect ratio. This will in turn put an effective upper limit on $fracWL$, but since the length is process dependent, so is this limit.







                              share|improve this answer














                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer








                              edited Dec 10 at 21:27

























                              answered Dec 10 at 19:06









                              Shamtam

                              2,3331022




                              2,3331022





















                                  5














                                  You'll find switching regulators with onchip MOSFET switching devices, designed to switch amps, over process and temperature and VDD variations. Even 10,000:1 width/length is used for such purposes. Of course the gate capacitance has become huge.



                                  Regarding the opposite, using the channel as a resistor, or as part of a matched pair for linear voltage-to-current converters in a phase-locked-detector, I've used 1:200 (width/length).






                                  share|improve this answer



























                                    5














                                    You'll find switching regulators with onchip MOSFET switching devices, designed to switch amps, over process and temperature and VDD variations. Even 10,000:1 width/length is used for such purposes. Of course the gate capacitance has become huge.



                                    Regarding the opposite, using the channel as a resistor, or as part of a matched pair for linear voltage-to-current converters in a phase-locked-detector, I've used 1:200 (width/length).






                                    share|improve this answer

























                                      5












                                      5








                                      5






                                      You'll find switching regulators with onchip MOSFET switching devices, designed to switch amps, over process and temperature and VDD variations. Even 10,000:1 width/length is used for such purposes. Of course the gate capacitance has become huge.



                                      Regarding the opposite, using the channel as a resistor, or as part of a matched pair for linear voltage-to-current converters in a phase-locked-detector, I've used 1:200 (width/length).






                                      share|improve this answer














                                      You'll find switching regulators with onchip MOSFET switching devices, designed to switch amps, over process and temperature and VDD variations. Even 10,000:1 width/length is used for such purposes. Of course the gate capacitance has become huge.



                                      Regarding the opposite, using the channel as a resistor, or as part of a matched pair for linear voltage-to-current converters in a phase-locked-detector, I've used 1:200 (width/length).







                                      share|improve this answer














                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer








                                      edited Dec 10 at 19:06

























                                      answered Dec 10 at 18:54









                                      analogsystemsrf

                                      13.6k2716




                                      13.6k2716



























                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded
















































                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid


                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid


                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function ()
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f411540%2fmosfet-w-l-ratio-limits-whats-unreasonable%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown






                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                                          Bahrain

                                          Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay