Files mounted over NFSv3 are owned by 4294967294 [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I have a windows 2016 server which I added "server for nfs" role on and shared a folder using nfs permissions.
On my Centos 6.4 server I have mounted the directory which I have shared on windows 2016 server.
but there is a problem that on my linux machine it says the files are owned by user 4294967294 and group 4294967294 with no read/write/execute permission. each time a file created in this mount folder I change the ownership of the files manually.
Is there anyway that I can set to use root as user and group by default ?



This is my fstab for the mounted location:



192.168.5.146:/Transfer /transfer nfs rw,hard,nosuid 0 0



And this is my nfsstat result:



/transfer from 192.168.5.146:/Transfer
Flags: rw,nosuid,relatime,vers=3,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountaddr=192.168.5.146,mountvers=3,mountport=2049,mountproto=udp,local_lock=none,addr=192.168.5.146










share|improve this question













closed as off-topic by sourcejedi, RalfFriedl, n.st, Stephen Harris, Archemar Dec 5 at 6:14



  • This question does not appear to be about Unix or Linux within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 1




    This post might be helpful: blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/sfu/2007/04/19/…
    – Haxiel
    Dec 4 at 11:22










  • the link you provided is for windows server 2003, what I asked is about windows server 2016
    – Ali Golestan
    Dec 4 at 12:20










  • the "who's 4294967294" link doesn't work for me (i have JS disabled tho), the correct link seems to be blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/sfu/2007/04/19/whos-4294967294
    – sourcejedi
    Dec 4 at 13:50






  • 1




    I'm voting to close this question for the reason: instructions for setting up Windows Server correctly (for interop with a given Linux system), or troubleshooting why it is not set up correctly, are not on-topic for Unix & Linux stackexchange. If you can show that the problem is not on the Windows side, feel free to edit accordingly...
    – sourcejedi
    Dec 4 at 14:00














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I have a windows 2016 server which I added "server for nfs" role on and shared a folder using nfs permissions.
On my Centos 6.4 server I have mounted the directory which I have shared on windows 2016 server.
but there is a problem that on my linux machine it says the files are owned by user 4294967294 and group 4294967294 with no read/write/execute permission. each time a file created in this mount folder I change the ownership of the files manually.
Is there anyway that I can set to use root as user and group by default ?



This is my fstab for the mounted location:



192.168.5.146:/Transfer /transfer nfs rw,hard,nosuid 0 0



And this is my nfsstat result:



/transfer from 192.168.5.146:/Transfer
Flags: rw,nosuid,relatime,vers=3,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountaddr=192.168.5.146,mountvers=3,mountport=2049,mountproto=udp,local_lock=none,addr=192.168.5.146










share|improve this question













closed as off-topic by sourcejedi, RalfFriedl, n.st, Stephen Harris, Archemar Dec 5 at 6:14



  • This question does not appear to be about Unix or Linux within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 1




    This post might be helpful: blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/sfu/2007/04/19/…
    – Haxiel
    Dec 4 at 11:22










  • the link you provided is for windows server 2003, what I asked is about windows server 2016
    – Ali Golestan
    Dec 4 at 12:20










  • the "who's 4294967294" link doesn't work for me (i have JS disabled tho), the correct link seems to be blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/sfu/2007/04/19/whos-4294967294
    – sourcejedi
    Dec 4 at 13:50






  • 1




    I'm voting to close this question for the reason: instructions for setting up Windows Server correctly (for interop with a given Linux system), or troubleshooting why it is not set up correctly, are not on-topic for Unix & Linux stackexchange. If you can show that the problem is not on the Windows side, feel free to edit accordingly...
    – sourcejedi
    Dec 4 at 14:00












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I have a windows 2016 server which I added "server for nfs" role on and shared a folder using nfs permissions.
On my Centos 6.4 server I have mounted the directory which I have shared on windows 2016 server.
but there is a problem that on my linux machine it says the files are owned by user 4294967294 and group 4294967294 with no read/write/execute permission. each time a file created in this mount folder I change the ownership of the files manually.
Is there anyway that I can set to use root as user and group by default ?



This is my fstab for the mounted location:



192.168.5.146:/Transfer /transfer nfs rw,hard,nosuid 0 0



And this is my nfsstat result:



/transfer from 192.168.5.146:/Transfer
Flags: rw,nosuid,relatime,vers=3,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountaddr=192.168.5.146,mountvers=3,mountport=2049,mountproto=udp,local_lock=none,addr=192.168.5.146










share|improve this question













I have a windows 2016 server which I added "server for nfs" role on and shared a folder using nfs permissions.
On my Centos 6.4 server I have mounted the directory which I have shared on windows 2016 server.
but there is a problem that on my linux machine it says the files are owned by user 4294967294 and group 4294967294 with no read/write/execute permission. each time a file created in this mount folder I change the ownership of the files manually.
Is there anyway that I can set to use root as user and group by default ?



This is my fstab for the mounted location:



192.168.5.146:/Transfer /transfer nfs rw,hard,nosuid 0 0



And this is my nfsstat result:



/transfer from 192.168.5.146:/Transfer
Flags: rw,nosuid,relatime,vers=3,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountaddr=192.168.5.146,mountvers=3,mountport=2049,mountproto=udp,local_lock=none,addr=192.168.5.146







centos mount nfs






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Dec 4 at 5:29









Ali Golestan

138214




138214




closed as off-topic by sourcejedi, RalfFriedl, n.st, Stephen Harris, Archemar Dec 5 at 6:14



  • This question does not appear to be about Unix or Linux within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




closed as off-topic by sourcejedi, RalfFriedl, n.st, Stephen Harris, Archemar Dec 5 at 6:14



  • This question does not appear to be about Unix or Linux within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







  • 1




    This post might be helpful: blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/sfu/2007/04/19/…
    – Haxiel
    Dec 4 at 11:22










  • the link you provided is for windows server 2003, what I asked is about windows server 2016
    – Ali Golestan
    Dec 4 at 12:20










  • the "who's 4294967294" link doesn't work for me (i have JS disabled tho), the correct link seems to be blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/sfu/2007/04/19/whos-4294967294
    – sourcejedi
    Dec 4 at 13:50






  • 1




    I'm voting to close this question for the reason: instructions for setting up Windows Server correctly (for interop with a given Linux system), or troubleshooting why it is not set up correctly, are not on-topic for Unix & Linux stackexchange. If you can show that the problem is not on the Windows side, feel free to edit accordingly...
    – sourcejedi
    Dec 4 at 14:00












  • 1




    This post might be helpful: blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/sfu/2007/04/19/…
    – Haxiel
    Dec 4 at 11:22










  • the link you provided is for windows server 2003, what I asked is about windows server 2016
    – Ali Golestan
    Dec 4 at 12:20










  • the "who's 4294967294" link doesn't work for me (i have JS disabled tho), the correct link seems to be blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/sfu/2007/04/19/whos-4294967294
    – sourcejedi
    Dec 4 at 13:50






  • 1




    I'm voting to close this question for the reason: instructions for setting up Windows Server correctly (for interop with a given Linux system), or troubleshooting why it is not set up correctly, are not on-topic for Unix & Linux stackexchange. If you can show that the problem is not on the Windows side, feel free to edit accordingly...
    – sourcejedi
    Dec 4 at 14:00







1




1




This post might be helpful: blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/sfu/2007/04/19/…
– Haxiel
Dec 4 at 11:22




This post might be helpful: blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/sfu/2007/04/19/…
– Haxiel
Dec 4 at 11:22












the link you provided is for windows server 2003, what I asked is about windows server 2016
– Ali Golestan
Dec 4 at 12:20




the link you provided is for windows server 2003, what I asked is about windows server 2016
– Ali Golestan
Dec 4 at 12:20












the "who's 4294967294" link doesn't work for me (i have JS disabled tho), the correct link seems to be blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/sfu/2007/04/19/whos-4294967294
– sourcejedi
Dec 4 at 13:50




the "who's 4294967294" link doesn't work for me (i have JS disabled tho), the correct link seems to be blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/sfu/2007/04/19/whos-4294967294
– sourcejedi
Dec 4 at 13:50




1




1




I'm voting to close this question for the reason: instructions for setting up Windows Server correctly (for interop with a given Linux system), or troubleshooting why it is not set up correctly, are not on-topic for Unix & Linux stackexchange. If you can show that the problem is not on the Windows side, feel free to edit accordingly...
– sourcejedi
Dec 4 at 14:00




I'm voting to close this question for the reason: instructions for setting up Windows Server correctly (for interop with a given Linux system), or troubleshooting why it is not set up correctly, are not on-topic for Unix & Linux stackexchange. If you can show that the problem is not on the Windows side, feel free to edit accordingly...
– sourcejedi
Dec 4 at 14:00















active

oldest

votes






















active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes

Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Bahrain

Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay