Why would a country persecute people with autism?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












A fictitious (not fantasty) story is set in a third-world country sometime during the 70s or 80s. The country operates similarly to any semi-developed country in central or south America. The countryside is barely developed, with maybe some token schooling. In the cities there is some technology, like airplanes and cars. The country has an armed police force (or soldiers), again present primarily in the cities. The vast majority of the citizens live in poverty.



It possesses one unique feature: they capture, persecute, and possibly kill autistic children. They will use force to take the children away from their families and will even prevent efforts to send an autistic child out of the country.



What would cause a culture to persecute people with autism?










share|improve this question









New contributor




LN6595 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Autistic people scream and shout for no reason really, all day and spit on people they just met and they have an incredibly disturbed perception of reality and have strange obsessions.
    – Eries
    2 mins ago














up vote
2
down vote

favorite












A fictitious (not fantasty) story is set in a third-world country sometime during the 70s or 80s. The country operates similarly to any semi-developed country in central or south America. The countryside is barely developed, with maybe some token schooling. In the cities there is some technology, like airplanes and cars. The country has an armed police force (or soldiers), again present primarily in the cities. The vast majority of the citizens live in poverty.



It possesses one unique feature: they capture, persecute, and possibly kill autistic children. They will use force to take the children away from their families and will even prevent efforts to send an autistic child out of the country.



What would cause a culture to persecute people with autism?










share|improve this question









New contributor




LN6595 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Autistic people scream and shout for no reason really, all day and spit on people they just met and they have an incredibly disturbed perception of reality and have strange obsessions.
    – Eries
    2 mins ago












up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











A fictitious (not fantasty) story is set in a third-world country sometime during the 70s or 80s. The country operates similarly to any semi-developed country in central or south America. The countryside is barely developed, with maybe some token schooling. In the cities there is some technology, like airplanes and cars. The country has an armed police force (or soldiers), again present primarily in the cities. The vast majority of the citizens live in poverty.



It possesses one unique feature: they capture, persecute, and possibly kill autistic children. They will use force to take the children away from their families and will even prevent efforts to send an autistic child out of the country.



What would cause a culture to persecute people with autism?










share|improve this question









New contributor




LN6595 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











A fictitious (not fantasty) story is set in a third-world country sometime during the 70s or 80s. The country operates similarly to any semi-developed country in central or south America. The countryside is barely developed, with maybe some token schooling. In the cities there is some technology, like airplanes and cars. The country has an armed police force (or soldiers), again present primarily in the cities. The vast majority of the citizens live in poverty.



It possesses one unique feature: they capture, persecute, and possibly kill autistic children. They will use force to take the children away from their families and will even prevent efforts to send an autistic child out of the country.



What would cause a culture to persecute people with autism?







culture government law social-norms






share|improve this question









New contributor




LN6595 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




LN6595 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago





















New contributor




LN6595 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 5 hours ago









LN6595

1114




1114




New contributor




LN6595 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





LN6595 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






LN6595 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • Autistic people scream and shout for no reason really, all day and spit on people they just met and they have an incredibly disturbed perception of reality and have strange obsessions.
    – Eries
    2 mins ago
















  • Autistic people scream and shout for no reason really, all day and spit on people they just met and they have an incredibly disturbed perception of reality and have strange obsessions.
    – Eries
    2 mins ago















Autistic people scream and shout for no reason really, all day and spit on people they just met and they have an incredibly disturbed perception of reality and have strange obsessions.
– Eries
2 mins ago




Autistic people scream and shout for no reason really, all day and spit on people they just met and they have an incredibly disturbed perception of reality and have strange obsessions.
– Eries
2 mins ago










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote














A fictitious (not fantasty) story is set in a third-world country sometime during the 70s or 80s. The country operates similarly to any semi-developed country in central or south America. The countryside is barely developed, with maybe some token schooling. In the cities there is some technology, like airplanes and cars. The country has an armed police force (or soldiers), again present primarily in the cities. The vast majority of the citizens live in poverty.



It possesses one unique feature: they capture, persecute, and possibly kill autistic children.




Superstition.



Autistic children can -- in all honesty -- behave Very, Very Strangely. If you're highly religious, then an autistic child can look demonically possessed.



Some people want to exorcise the demons -- "the power of Christ compels you!" -- but others -- and they just happen to be the ones in power -- want to drive a stake through their hearts and bury them in pits in unsanctified ground.






share|improve this answer



























    up vote
    2
    down vote













    For the same reason that autistic people often have trouble in most societies today: The tendency toward literal observation and very direct speech. This can cause all sorts of trouble (think about telling your boss exactly what you think of her management style), and just "refrain from commenting honestly" can be difficult enough, much less the polite lies that are the typical social lubricant.



    Combine this emperor-has-no-clothes straightforwardness with a society where political correctness is Serious Business, such as the Soviet Union (where people were afraid to be the first to stop clapping for political speeches), and you have a situation where being autistic (or inconveniently honest in general) will get you disappeared.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    chrylis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.
























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      NOTE: My notes are for the United States, though there will be many similarities with other industrialized countries. And non-industrialized countries.



      This is not unique.



      Capturing and persecuting disabled children (in other words, putting them in institutions) was a very common response to "difference" in most of the 20th century and also some times before.



      I know people who were institutionalized (with the approval of their families) for having Down Syndrome or juvenile arthritis (which doesn't affect intellect, just walking and using your arms). Even children with something as simple as club foot ended up in institutions.



      Kids who needed physical adaptations to their environment (places to roll their wheelchair...or the wheelchair in the first place) were institutionalized when they were too big to carry around. Changing the location of the kid was easier than changing the infrastructure.



      Mental health issues also were something that frequently pegged people as "unfit" for society. This included women who spoke out against sexism, people of color who were too "uppity," people suffering from trauma (especially things one didn't talk about, like being raped), and people with actual mental illness.



      Historically, there were not a lot of people with autism in institutions. Simply because autism wasn't very common. Now it's extremely common (plenty of studies show that only a part of it is due to changes in diagnostic criteria and the increase in diagnosis overall). But if we were still a society with large amounts of institutionalization directly due to disability, the institutions would be filled with autistic children and adults too.



      So if your fictitious society targets autistic children, it may simply be because autism is perhaps the most common condition in children with disabilities that aren't overly physical (blindness, losing a limb, etc).



      We still have group homes and the like but they are not institutions and they are not for small children. Those kids who can't be with their families mostly go to foster care. But, guess what? We still have capture and persecution of people with disabilities in the US. It's called prison. Huge percentages of modern day prisoners are people with mental illness (often masked by self-medication aka drug abuse) or people who don't "fit in" in some manner or people with other kinds of disability.



      With American-style prisons for profit, there's an incentive to increase the prison population. So, if you're part of a marginalized community, it doesn't take much to get sentenced. Then you're put to work. You get paid almost nothing while the prisons take payment from the companies who benefit from the cheap labor.



      I'm talking about real life here. I'm not making this stuff up.



      So if your world has a lot of people with autism and a lot of oppression of people who are different, then people with autism will be targeted. The only thing you have to do differently from real life is the fact that autism was not common in the 70's and 80's and is not common in 3rd world countries.






      share|improve this answer




















      • According to your answer, why would they take a child against his parents’ will? And how would they justify killing the child?
        – LN6595
        2 hours ago











      • Back when institutionalism was the norm for disabled children, parents agreed to it because no one had disabled children at home (hardly anyone). There were no resources to care for a child with special needs at home or for them to attend public schools. So parents didn't object, or at least not strongly, when doctors recommended the child go into a "home." As for the killing part, well accidents happen, ya know. Children act up and are punished. See, she/he was a bad seed and it's a good thing you didn't keep her/him. She/he was sick anyway. She/he's alive, you just can't see her/him.
        – Cyn
        2 hours ago

















      up vote
      0
      down vote













      In WWII concentration camps targeted "problem" DNA, things that "ruined" the human race like genetically passed defects, homosexuality, and (of highest priority) the Jewish race.



      As awful as that is, it's a real event, and it only happened ~80 years ago. Your story could follow a similar thing, where the intention could seem noble to some (who have 0% compassion or humanity) to "purify" the country of autism.






      share|improve this answer



























        up vote
        0
        down vote













        Eugenics + Poverty



        If you feel like hating humanity you can look up the practise of forced sterilization, which was quite widespread even 40 years ago. And you still see genocides in 3rd world countries of undesirables, it is not a far stretch to connect autism with undesirables.
        All you need is a tiny bit of propaganda in a paranoid or stressed society and they would have no problem doing what you describe, real countries have done far worse.



        In 1933he Nazi passed the ‘Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring’, allowing for the forced sterilisation of those regarded as "unfit". Only a few years later his included panels for deciding which disabled people should be "mercy killed" instead of just being sterilized. They kept it hushed up enough most families though the people were just being put in special care facilities, later they would be told they had died of some common disease. Most of the techniques they applied to later concentration camps actually started as techniques for "solving" the disabled problem.



        If poverty is as common as you say people in your fictional country will likely welcome such measures for the burden they remove. Also keep in mind shame can easily keep people from checking on institutionalized family members so you may not even see much checking to begin with, so the lies only need to be paper.





        share






















          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "579"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );






          LN6595 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f129825%2fwhy-would-a-country-persecute-people-with-autism%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes








          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          3
          down vote














          A fictitious (not fantasty) story is set in a third-world country sometime during the 70s or 80s. The country operates similarly to any semi-developed country in central or south America. The countryside is barely developed, with maybe some token schooling. In the cities there is some technology, like airplanes and cars. The country has an armed police force (or soldiers), again present primarily in the cities. The vast majority of the citizens live in poverty.



          It possesses one unique feature: they capture, persecute, and possibly kill autistic children.




          Superstition.



          Autistic children can -- in all honesty -- behave Very, Very Strangely. If you're highly religious, then an autistic child can look demonically possessed.



          Some people want to exorcise the demons -- "the power of Christ compels you!" -- but others -- and they just happen to be the ones in power -- want to drive a stake through their hearts and bury them in pits in unsanctified ground.






          share|improve this answer
























            up vote
            3
            down vote














            A fictitious (not fantasty) story is set in a third-world country sometime during the 70s or 80s. The country operates similarly to any semi-developed country in central or south America. The countryside is barely developed, with maybe some token schooling. In the cities there is some technology, like airplanes and cars. The country has an armed police force (or soldiers), again present primarily in the cities. The vast majority of the citizens live in poverty.



            It possesses one unique feature: they capture, persecute, and possibly kill autistic children.




            Superstition.



            Autistic children can -- in all honesty -- behave Very, Very Strangely. If you're highly religious, then an autistic child can look demonically possessed.



            Some people want to exorcise the demons -- "the power of Christ compels you!" -- but others -- and they just happen to be the ones in power -- want to drive a stake through their hearts and bury them in pits in unsanctified ground.






            share|improve this answer






















              up vote
              3
              down vote










              up vote
              3
              down vote










              A fictitious (not fantasty) story is set in a third-world country sometime during the 70s or 80s. The country operates similarly to any semi-developed country in central or south America. The countryside is barely developed, with maybe some token schooling. In the cities there is some technology, like airplanes and cars. The country has an armed police force (or soldiers), again present primarily in the cities. The vast majority of the citizens live in poverty.



              It possesses one unique feature: they capture, persecute, and possibly kill autistic children.




              Superstition.



              Autistic children can -- in all honesty -- behave Very, Very Strangely. If you're highly religious, then an autistic child can look demonically possessed.



              Some people want to exorcise the demons -- "the power of Christ compels you!" -- but others -- and they just happen to be the ones in power -- want to drive a stake through their hearts and bury them in pits in unsanctified ground.






              share|improve this answer













              A fictitious (not fantasty) story is set in a third-world country sometime during the 70s or 80s. The country operates similarly to any semi-developed country in central or south America. The countryside is barely developed, with maybe some token schooling. In the cities there is some technology, like airplanes and cars. The country has an armed police force (or soldiers), again present primarily in the cities. The vast majority of the citizens live in poverty.



              It possesses one unique feature: they capture, persecute, and possibly kill autistic children.




              Superstition.



              Autistic children can -- in all honesty -- behave Very, Very Strangely. If you're highly religious, then an autistic child can look demonically possessed.



              Some people want to exorcise the demons -- "the power of Christ compels you!" -- but others -- and they just happen to be the ones in power -- want to drive a stake through their hearts and bury them in pits in unsanctified ground.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 5 hours ago









              RonJohn

              14.2k12867




              14.2k12867




















                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote













                  For the same reason that autistic people often have trouble in most societies today: The tendency toward literal observation and very direct speech. This can cause all sorts of trouble (think about telling your boss exactly what you think of her management style), and just "refrain from commenting honestly" can be difficult enough, much less the polite lies that are the typical social lubricant.



                  Combine this emperor-has-no-clothes straightforwardness with a society where political correctness is Serious Business, such as the Soviet Union (where people were afraid to be the first to stop clapping for political speeches), and you have a situation where being autistic (or inconveniently honest in general) will get you disappeared.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  chrylis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote













                    For the same reason that autistic people often have trouble in most societies today: The tendency toward literal observation and very direct speech. This can cause all sorts of trouble (think about telling your boss exactly what you think of her management style), and just "refrain from commenting honestly" can be difficult enough, much less the polite lies that are the typical social lubricant.



                    Combine this emperor-has-no-clothes straightforwardness with a society where political correctness is Serious Business, such as the Soviet Union (where people were afraid to be the first to stop clapping for political speeches), and you have a situation where being autistic (or inconveniently honest in general) will get you disappeared.






                    share|improve this answer








                    New contributor




                    chrylis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.



















                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote









                      For the same reason that autistic people often have trouble in most societies today: The tendency toward literal observation and very direct speech. This can cause all sorts of trouble (think about telling your boss exactly what you think of her management style), and just "refrain from commenting honestly" can be difficult enough, much less the polite lies that are the typical social lubricant.



                      Combine this emperor-has-no-clothes straightforwardness with a society where political correctness is Serious Business, such as the Soviet Union (where people were afraid to be the first to stop clapping for political speeches), and you have a situation where being autistic (or inconveniently honest in general) will get you disappeared.






                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      chrylis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      For the same reason that autistic people often have trouble in most societies today: The tendency toward literal observation and very direct speech. This can cause all sorts of trouble (think about telling your boss exactly what you think of her management style), and just "refrain from commenting honestly" can be difficult enough, much less the polite lies that are the typical social lubricant.



                      Combine this emperor-has-no-clothes straightforwardness with a society where political correctness is Serious Business, such as the Soviet Union (where people were afraid to be the first to stop clapping for political speeches), and you have a situation where being autistic (or inconveniently honest in general) will get you disappeared.







                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      chrylis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer






                      New contributor




                      chrylis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      answered 2 hours ago









                      chrylis

                      12724




                      12724




                      New contributor




                      chrylis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





                      New contributor





                      chrylis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                      chrylis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          NOTE: My notes are for the United States, though there will be many similarities with other industrialized countries. And non-industrialized countries.



                          This is not unique.



                          Capturing and persecuting disabled children (in other words, putting them in institutions) was a very common response to "difference" in most of the 20th century and also some times before.



                          I know people who were institutionalized (with the approval of their families) for having Down Syndrome or juvenile arthritis (which doesn't affect intellect, just walking and using your arms). Even children with something as simple as club foot ended up in institutions.



                          Kids who needed physical adaptations to their environment (places to roll their wheelchair...or the wheelchair in the first place) were institutionalized when they were too big to carry around. Changing the location of the kid was easier than changing the infrastructure.



                          Mental health issues also were something that frequently pegged people as "unfit" for society. This included women who spoke out against sexism, people of color who were too "uppity," people suffering from trauma (especially things one didn't talk about, like being raped), and people with actual mental illness.



                          Historically, there were not a lot of people with autism in institutions. Simply because autism wasn't very common. Now it's extremely common (plenty of studies show that only a part of it is due to changes in diagnostic criteria and the increase in diagnosis overall). But if we were still a society with large amounts of institutionalization directly due to disability, the institutions would be filled with autistic children and adults too.



                          So if your fictitious society targets autistic children, it may simply be because autism is perhaps the most common condition in children with disabilities that aren't overly physical (blindness, losing a limb, etc).



                          We still have group homes and the like but they are not institutions and they are not for small children. Those kids who can't be with their families mostly go to foster care. But, guess what? We still have capture and persecution of people with disabilities in the US. It's called prison. Huge percentages of modern day prisoners are people with mental illness (often masked by self-medication aka drug abuse) or people who don't "fit in" in some manner or people with other kinds of disability.



                          With American-style prisons for profit, there's an incentive to increase the prison population. So, if you're part of a marginalized community, it doesn't take much to get sentenced. Then you're put to work. You get paid almost nothing while the prisons take payment from the companies who benefit from the cheap labor.



                          I'm talking about real life here. I'm not making this stuff up.



                          So if your world has a lot of people with autism and a lot of oppression of people who are different, then people with autism will be targeted. The only thing you have to do differently from real life is the fact that autism was not common in the 70's and 80's and is not common in 3rd world countries.






                          share|improve this answer




















                          • According to your answer, why would they take a child against his parents’ will? And how would they justify killing the child?
                            – LN6595
                            2 hours ago











                          • Back when institutionalism was the norm for disabled children, parents agreed to it because no one had disabled children at home (hardly anyone). There were no resources to care for a child with special needs at home or for them to attend public schools. So parents didn't object, or at least not strongly, when doctors recommended the child go into a "home." As for the killing part, well accidents happen, ya know. Children act up and are punished. See, she/he was a bad seed and it's a good thing you didn't keep her/him. She/he was sick anyway. She/he's alive, you just can't see her/him.
                            – Cyn
                            2 hours ago














                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          NOTE: My notes are for the United States, though there will be many similarities with other industrialized countries. And non-industrialized countries.



                          This is not unique.



                          Capturing and persecuting disabled children (in other words, putting them in institutions) was a very common response to "difference" in most of the 20th century and also some times before.



                          I know people who were institutionalized (with the approval of their families) for having Down Syndrome or juvenile arthritis (which doesn't affect intellect, just walking and using your arms). Even children with something as simple as club foot ended up in institutions.



                          Kids who needed physical adaptations to their environment (places to roll their wheelchair...or the wheelchair in the first place) were institutionalized when they were too big to carry around. Changing the location of the kid was easier than changing the infrastructure.



                          Mental health issues also were something that frequently pegged people as "unfit" for society. This included women who spoke out against sexism, people of color who were too "uppity," people suffering from trauma (especially things one didn't talk about, like being raped), and people with actual mental illness.



                          Historically, there were not a lot of people with autism in institutions. Simply because autism wasn't very common. Now it's extremely common (plenty of studies show that only a part of it is due to changes in diagnostic criteria and the increase in diagnosis overall). But if we were still a society with large amounts of institutionalization directly due to disability, the institutions would be filled with autistic children and adults too.



                          So if your fictitious society targets autistic children, it may simply be because autism is perhaps the most common condition in children with disabilities that aren't overly physical (blindness, losing a limb, etc).



                          We still have group homes and the like but they are not institutions and they are not for small children. Those kids who can't be with their families mostly go to foster care. But, guess what? We still have capture and persecution of people with disabilities in the US. It's called prison. Huge percentages of modern day prisoners are people with mental illness (often masked by self-medication aka drug abuse) or people who don't "fit in" in some manner or people with other kinds of disability.



                          With American-style prisons for profit, there's an incentive to increase the prison population. So, if you're part of a marginalized community, it doesn't take much to get sentenced. Then you're put to work. You get paid almost nothing while the prisons take payment from the companies who benefit from the cheap labor.



                          I'm talking about real life here. I'm not making this stuff up.



                          So if your world has a lot of people with autism and a lot of oppression of people who are different, then people with autism will be targeted. The only thing you have to do differently from real life is the fact that autism was not common in the 70's and 80's and is not common in 3rd world countries.






                          share|improve this answer




















                          • According to your answer, why would they take a child against his parents’ will? And how would they justify killing the child?
                            – LN6595
                            2 hours ago











                          • Back when institutionalism was the norm for disabled children, parents agreed to it because no one had disabled children at home (hardly anyone). There were no resources to care for a child with special needs at home or for them to attend public schools. So parents didn't object, or at least not strongly, when doctors recommended the child go into a "home." As for the killing part, well accidents happen, ya know. Children act up and are punished. See, she/he was a bad seed and it's a good thing you didn't keep her/him. She/he was sick anyway. She/he's alive, you just can't see her/him.
                            – Cyn
                            2 hours ago












                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote









                          NOTE: My notes are for the United States, though there will be many similarities with other industrialized countries. And non-industrialized countries.



                          This is not unique.



                          Capturing and persecuting disabled children (in other words, putting them in institutions) was a very common response to "difference" in most of the 20th century and also some times before.



                          I know people who were institutionalized (with the approval of their families) for having Down Syndrome or juvenile arthritis (which doesn't affect intellect, just walking and using your arms). Even children with something as simple as club foot ended up in institutions.



                          Kids who needed physical adaptations to their environment (places to roll their wheelchair...or the wheelchair in the first place) were institutionalized when they were too big to carry around. Changing the location of the kid was easier than changing the infrastructure.



                          Mental health issues also were something that frequently pegged people as "unfit" for society. This included women who spoke out against sexism, people of color who were too "uppity," people suffering from trauma (especially things one didn't talk about, like being raped), and people with actual mental illness.



                          Historically, there were not a lot of people with autism in institutions. Simply because autism wasn't very common. Now it's extremely common (plenty of studies show that only a part of it is due to changes in diagnostic criteria and the increase in diagnosis overall). But if we were still a society with large amounts of institutionalization directly due to disability, the institutions would be filled with autistic children and adults too.



                          So if your fictitious society targets autistic children, it may simply be because autism is perhaps the most common condition in children with disabilities that aren't overly physical (blindness, losing a limb, etc).



                          We still have group homes and the like but they are not institutions and they are not for small children. Those kids who can't be with their families mostly go to foster care. But, guess what? We still have capture and persecution of people with disabilities in the US. It's called prison. Huge percentages of modern day prisoners are people with mental illness (often masked by self-medication aka drug abuse) or people who don't "fit in" in some manner or people with other kinds of disability.



                          With American-style prisons for profit, there's an incentive to increase the prison population. So, if you're part of a marginalized community, it doesn't take much to get sentenced. Then you're put to work. You get paid almost nothing while the prisons take payment from the companies who benefit from the cheap labor.



                          I'm talking about real life here. I'm not making this stuff up.



                          So if your world has a lot of people with autism and a lot of oppression of people who are different, then people with autism will be targeted. The only thing you have to do differently from real life is the fact that autism was not common in the 70's and 80's and is not common in 3rd world countries.






                          share|improve this answer












                          NOTE: My notes are for the United States, though there will be many similarities with other industrialized countries. And non-industrialized countries.



                          This is not unique.



                          Capturing and persecuting disabled children (in other words, putting them in institutions) was a very common response to "difference" in most of the 20th century and also some times before.



                          I know people who were institutionalized (with the approval of their families) for having Down Syndrome or juvenile arthritis (which doesn't affect intellect, just walking and using your arms). Even children with something as simple as club foot ended up in institutions.



                          Kids who needed physical adaptations to their environment (places to roll their wheelchair...or the wheelchair in the first place) were institutionalized when they were too big to carry around. Changing the location of the kid was easier than changing the infrastructure.



                          Mental health issues also were something that frequently pegged people as "unfit" for society. This included women who spoke out against sexism, people of color who were too "uppity," people suffering from trauma (especially things one didn't talk about, like being raped), and people with actual mental illness.



                          Historically, there were not a lot of people with autism in institutions. Simply because autism wasn't very common. Now it's extremely common (plenty of studies show that only a part of it is due to changes in diagnostic criteria and the increase in diagnosis overall). But if we were still a society with large amounts of institutionalization directly due to disability, the institutions would be filled with autistic children and adults too.



                          So if your fictitious society targets autistic children, it may simply be because autism is perhaps the most common condition in children with disabilities that aren't overly physical (blindness, losing a limb, etc).



                          We still have group homes and the like but they are not institutions and they are not for small children. Those kids who can't be with their families mostly go to foster care. But, guess what? We still have capture and persecution of people with disabilities in the US. It's called prison. Huge percentages of modern day prisoners are people with mental illness (often masked by self-medication aka drug abuse) or people who don't "fit in" in some manner or people with other kinds of disability.



                          With American-style prisons for profit, there's an incentive to increase the prison population. So, if you're part of a marginalized community, it doesn't take much to get sentenced. Then you're put to work. You get paid almost nothing while the prisons take payment from the companies who benefit from the cheap labor.



                          I'm talking about real life here. I'm not making this stuff up.



                          So if your world has a lot of people with autism and a lot of oppression of people who are different, then people with autism will be targeted. The only thing you have to do differently from real life is the fact that autism was not common in the 70's and 80's and is not common in 3rd world countries.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 3 hours ago









                          Cyn

                          1,232113




                          1,232113











                          • According to your answer, why would they take a child against his parents’ will? And how would they justify killing the child?
                            – LN6595
                            2 hours ago











                          • Back when institutionalism was the norm for disabled children, parents agreed to it because no one had disabled children at home (hardly anyone). There were no resources to care for a child with special needs at home or for them to attend public schools. So parents didn't object, or at least not strongly, when doctors recommended the child go into a "home." As for the killing part, well accidents happen, ya know. Children act up and are punished. See, she/he was a bad seed and it's a good thing you didn't keep her/him. She/he was sick anyway. She/he's alive, you just can't see her/him.
                            – Cyn
                            2 hours ago
















                          • According to your answer, why would they take a child against his parents’ will? And how would they justify killing the child?
                            – LN6595
                            2 hours ago











                          • Back when institutionalism was the norm for disabled children, parents agreed to it because no one had disabled children at home (hardly anyone). There were no resources to care for a child with special needs at home or for them to attend public schools. So parents didn't object, or at least not strongly, when doctors recommended the child go into a "home." As for the killing part, well accidents happen, ya know. Children act up and are punished. See, she/he was a bad seed and it's a good thing you didn't keep her/him. She/he was sick anyway. She/he's alive, you just can't see her/him.
                            – Cyn
                            2 hours ago















                          According to your answer, why would they take a child against his parents’ will? And how would they justify killing the child?
                          – LN6595
                          2 hours ago





                          According to your answer, why would they take a child against his parents’ will? And how would they justify killing the child?
                          – LN6595
                          2 hours ago













                          Back when institutionalism was the norm for disabled children, parents agreed to it because no one had disabled children at home (hardly anyone). There were no resources to care for a child with special needs at home or for them to attend public schools. So parents didn't object, or at least not strongly, when doctors recommended the child go into a "home." As for the killing part, well accidents happen, ya know. Children act up and are punished. See, she/he was a bad seed and it's a good thing you didn't keep her/him. She/he was sick anyway. She/he's alive, you just can't see her/him.
                          – Cyn
                          2 hours ago




                          Back when institutionalism was the norm for disabled children, parents agreed to it because no one had disabled children at home (hardly anyone). There were no resources to care for a child with special needs at home or for them to attend public schools. So parents didn't object, or at least not strongly, when doctors recommended the child go into a "home." As for the killing part, well accidents happen, ya know. Children act up and are punished. See, she/he was a bad seed and it's a good thing you didn't keep her/him. She/he was sick anyway. She/he's alive, you just can't see her/him.
                          – Cyn
                          2 hours ago










                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote













                          In WWII concentration camps targeted "problem" DNA, things that "ruined" the human race like genetically passed defects, homosexuality, and (of highest priority) the Jewish race.



                          As awful as that is, it's a real event, and it only happened ~80 years ago. Your story could follow a similar thing, where the intention could seem noble to some (who have 0% compassion or humanity) to "purify" the country of autism.






                          share|improve this answer
























                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote













                            In WWII concentration camps targeted "problem" DNA, things that "ruined" the human race like genetically passed defects, homosexuality, and (of highest priority) the Jewish race.



                            As awful as that is, it's a real event, and it only happened ~80 years ago. Your story could follow a similar thing, where the intention could seem noble to some (who have 0% compassion or humanity) to "purify" the country of autism.






                            share|improve this answer






















                              up vote
                              0
                              down vote










                              up vote
                              0
                              down vote









                              In WWII concentration camps targeted "problem" DNA, things that "ruined" the human race like genetically passed defects, homosexuality, and (of highest priority) the Jewish race.



                              As awful as that is, it's a real event, and it only happened ~80 years ago. Your story could follow a similar thing, where the intention could seem noble to some (who have 0% compassion or humanity) to "purify" the country of autism.






                              share|improve this answer












                              In WWII concentration camps targeted "problem" DNA, things that "ruined" the human race like genetically passed defects, homosexuality, and (of highest priority) the Jewish race.



                              As awful as that is, it's a real event, and it only happened ~80 years ago. Your story could follow a similar thing, where the intention could seem noble to some (who have 0% compassion or humanity) to "purify" the country of autism.







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered 35 mins ago









                              Mirror318

                              2,924616




                              2,924616




















                                  up vote
                                  0
                                  down vote













                                  Eugenics + Poverty



                                  If you feel like hating humanity you can look up the practise of forced sterilization, which was quite widespread even 40 years ago. And you still see genocides in 3rd world countries of undesirables, it is not a far stretch to connect autism with undesirables.
                                  All you need is a tiny bit of propaganda in a paranoid or stressed society and they would have no problem doing what you describe, real countries have done far worse.



                                  In 1933he Nazi passed the ‘Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring’, allowing for the forced sterilisation of those regarded as "unfit". Only a few years later his included panels for deciding which disabled people should be "mercy killed" instead of just being sterilized. They kept it hushed up enough most families though the people were just being put in special care facilities, later they would be told they had died of some common disease. Most of the techniques they applied to later concentration camps actually started as techniques for "solving" the disabled problem.



                                  If poverty is as common as you say people in your fictional country will likely welcome such measures for the burden they remove. Also keep in mind shame can easily keep people from checking on institutionalized family members so you may not even see much checking to begin with, so the lies only need to be paper.





                                  share


























                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote













                                    Eugenics + Poverty



                                    If you feel like hating humanity you can look up the practise of forced sterilization, which was quite widespread even 40 years ago. And you still see genocides in 3rd world countries of undesirables, it is not a far stretch to connect autism with undesirables.
                                    All you need is a tiny bit of propaganda in a paranoid or stressed society and they would have no problem doing what you describe, real countries have done far worse.



                                    In 1933he Nazi passed the ‘Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring’, allowing for the forced sterilisation of those regarded as "unfit". Only a few years later his included panels for deciding which disabled people should be "mercy killed" instead of just being sterilized. They kept it hushed up enough most families though the people were just being put in special care facilities, later they would be told they had died of some common disease. Most of the techniques they applied to later concentration camps actually started as techniques for "solving" the disabled problem.



                                    If poverty is as common as you say people in your fictional country will likely welcome such measures for the burden they remove. Also keep in mind shame can easily keep people from checking on institutionalized family members so you may not even see much checking to begin with, so the lies only need to be paper.





                                    share
























                                      up vote
                                      0
                                      down vote










                                      up vote
                                      0
                                      down vote









                                      Eugenics + Poverty



                                      If you feel like hating humanity you can look up the practise of forced sterilization, which was quite widespread even 40 years ago. And you still see genocides in 3rd world countries of undesirables, it is not a far stretch to connect autism with undesirables.
                                      All you need is a tiny bit of propaganda in a paranoid or stressed society and they would have no problem doing what you describe, real countries have done far worse.



                                      In 1933he Nazi passed the ‘Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring’, allowing for the forced sterilisation of those regarded as "unfit". Only a few years later his included panels for deciding which disabled people should be "mercy killed" instead of just being sterilized. They kept it hushed up enough most families though the people were just being put in special care facilities, later they would be told they had died of some common disease. Most of the techniques they applied to later concentration camps actually started as techniques for "solving" the disabled problem.



                                      If poverty is as common as you say people in your fictional country will likely welcome such measures for the burden they remove. Also keep in mind shame can easily keep people from checking on institutionalized family members so you may not even see much checking to begin with, so the lies only need to be paper.





                                      share














                                      Eugenics + Poverty



                                      If you feel like hating humanity you can look up the practise of forced sterilization, which was quite widespread even 40 years ago. And you still see genocides in 3rd world countries of undesirables, it is not a far stretch to connect autism with undesirables.
                                      All you need is a tiny bit of propaganda in a paranoid or stressed society and they would have no problem doing what you describe, real countries have done far worse.



                                      In 1933he Nazi passed the ‘Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring’, allowing for the forced sterilisation of those regarded as "unfit". Only a few years later his included panels for deciding which disabled people should be "mercy killed" instead of just being sterilized. They kept it hushed up enough most families though the people were just being put in special care facilities, later they would be told they had died of some common disease. Most of the techniques they applied to later concentration camps actually started as techniques for "solving" the disabled problem.



                                      If poverty is as common as you say people in your fictional country will likely welcome such measures for the burden they remove. Also keep in mind shame can easily keep people from checking on institutionalized family members so you may not even see much checking to begin with, so the lies only need to be paper.






                                      share













                                      share


                                      share








                                      edited just now

























                                      answered 7 mins ago









                                      John

                                      29.2k839102




                                      29.2k839102




















                                          LN6595 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                                           

                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded


















                                          LN6595 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                          LN6595 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                                          LN6595 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                                           


                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function ()
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f129825%2fwhy-would-a-country-persecute-people-with-autism%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                          );

                                          Post as a guest













































































                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                                          Bahrain

                                          Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay