What is umask in Linux [on hold]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
-6
down vote

favorite












Trying to understand what is umask in Bash-scripting, I went to man bash and searched "umask". I found these entries, for starters:




the file creation mode mask as set by umask or inherited from the shell's parent




and:




umask [-p] [-S] [mode]



The user file-creation mask is set to mode. If mode begins with a digit, it is interpreted as an octal number; otherwise
it is interpreted as a symbolic mode mask similar to that accepted by
chmod(1).




I understand that umask as a shell built-in command that changes some particular default permissions mode of newly created files by executing some predefined bit mask (or just "mask") somehow.



I executed umask and got 0000. I tried to execute umask 0600 and then umask returned 0600 but I can't see how it effects my system, hence I'm not sure what "mode" means here.



Before I try to understand how umask works technically, it is important to me to understand the concept of umask in Linux in general.



What is the "mode" that is changed for newly created files? In other words, it doesn't seem to me to be their permissions I change with chmod (dirs and regular files are created with their default permissions either way - umask 0000 or umask 0600) so what default permissions change exactly?










share|improve this question















put on hold as unclear what you're asking by JdeBP, Jeff Schaller, thrig, mosvy, JigglyNaga yesterday


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • Why do you think that it does?
    – JdeBP
    2 days ago










  • I thinked it might be due to different names and also because I once read about it and didn't find a clear example of a difference (due to lack of background knowledge at the time)... I don't think it's worth discussing...
    – JohnDoea
    yesterday










  • You've asked twice, now, how a file creation mask is not a mask. Both times, people have asked in several ways why you think that to even be the case. You did not explain in the deleted question, and you aren't really explaining here. Do not be surprised that the repeated question gains no traction.
    – JdeBP
    yesterday










  • I think I explained it above and the explanation doesn't satisfy you; go on, downvote more and more of my questions. Very helpful and communal.
    – JohnDoea
    yesterday







  • 1




    The only instance of the word "file" from the quoted bash man page is "file-creation" -- you're on the wrong track by assuming that the umask command changes existing file permissions. Try it and see!
    – Jeff Schaller
    1 hour ago














up vote
-6
down vote

favorite












Trying to understand what is umask in Bash-scripting, I went to man bash and searched "umask". I found these entries, for starters:




the file creation mode mask as set by umask or inherited from the shell's parent




and:




umask [-p] [-S] [mode]



The user file-creation mask is set to mode. If mode begins with a digit, it is interpreted as an octal number; otherwise
it is interpreted as a symbolic mode mask similar to that accepted by
chmod(1).




I understand that umask as a shell built-in command that changes some particular default permissions mode of newly created files by executing some predefined bit mask (or just "mask") somehow.



I executed umask and got 0000. I tried to execute umask 0600 and then umask returned 0600 but I can't see how it effects my system, hence I'm not sure what "mode" means here.



Before I try to understand how umask works technically, it is important to me to understand the concept of umask in Linux in general.



What is the "mode" that is changed for newly created files? In other words, it doesn't seem to me to be their permissions I change with chmod (dirs and regular files are created with their default permissions either way - umask 0000 or umask 0600) so what default permissions change exactly?










share|improve this question















put on hold as unclear what you're asking by JdeBP, Jeff Schaller, thrig, mosvy, JigglyNaga yesterday


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • Why do you think that it does?
    – JdeBP
    2 days ago










  • I thinked it might be due to different names and also because I once read about it and didn't find a clear example of a difference (due to lack of background knowledge at the time)... I don't think it's worth discussing...
    – JohnDoea
    yesterday










  • You've asked twice, now, how a file creation mask is not a mask. Both times, people have asked in several ways why you think that to even be the case. You did not explain in the deleted question, and you aren't really explaining here. Do not be surprised that the repeated question gains no traction.
    – JdeBP
    yesterday










  • I think I explained it above and the explanation doesn't satisfy you; go on, downvote more and more of my questions. Very helpful and communal.
    – JohnDoea
    yesterday







  • 1




    The only instance of the word "file" from the quoted bash man page is "file-creation" -- you're on the wrong track by assuming that the umask command changes existing file permissions. Try it and see!
    – Jeff Schaller
    1 hour ago












up vote
-6
down vote

favorite









up vote
-6
down vote

favorite











Trying to understand what is umask in Bash-scripting, I went to man bash and searched "umask". I found these entries, for starters:




the file creation mode mask as set by umask or inherited from the shell's parent




and:




umask [-p] [-S] [mode]



The user file-creation mask is set to mode. If mode begins with a digit, it is interpreted as an octal number; otherwise
it is interpreted as a symbolic mode mask similar to that accepted by
chmod(1).




I understand that umask as a shell built-in command that changes some particular default permissions mode of newly created files by executing some predefined bit mask (or just "mask") somehow.



I executed umask and got 0000. I tried to execute umask 0600 and then umask returned 0600 but I can't see how it effects my system, hence I'm not sure what "mode" means here.



Before I try to understand how umask works technically, it is important to me to understand the concept of umask in Linux in general.



What is the "mode" that is changed for newly created files? In other words, it doesn't seem to me to be their permissions I change with chmod (dirs and regular files are created with their default permissions either way - umask 0000 or umask 0600) so what default permissions change exactly?










share|improve this question















Trying to understand what is umask in Bash-scripting, I went to man bash and searched "umask". I found these entries, for starters:




the file creation mode mask as set by umask or inherited from the shell's parent




and:




umask [-p] [-S] [mode]



The user file-creation mask is set to mode. If mode begins with a digit, it is interpreted as an octal number; otherwise
it is interpreted as a symbolic mode mask similar to that accepted by
chmod(1).




I understand that umask as a shell built-in command that changes some particular default permissions mode of newly created files by executing some predefined bit mask (or just "mask") somehow.



I executed umask and got 0000. I tried to execute umask 0600 and then umask returned 0600 but I can't see how it effects my system, hence I'm not sure what "mode" means here.



Before I try to understand how umask works technically, it is important to me to understand the concept of umask in Linux in general.



What is the "mode" that is changed for newly created files? In other words, it doesn't seem to me to be their permissions I change with chmod (dirs and regular files are created with their default permissions either way - umask 0000 or umask 0600) so what default permissions change exactly?







shell umask terminology






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 21 mins ago

























asked 2 days ago









JohnDoea

98730




98730




put on hold as unclear what you're asking by JdeBP, Jeff Schaller, thrig, mosvy, JigglyNaga yesterday


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






put on hold as unclear what you're asking by JdeBP, Jeff Schaller, thrig, mosvy, JigglyNaga yesterday


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • Why do you think that it does?
    – JdeBP
    2 days ago










  • I thinked it might be due to different names and also because I once read about it and didn't find a clear example of a difference (due to lack of background knowledge at the time)... I don't think it's worth discussing...
    – JohnDoea
    yesterday










  • You've asked twice, now, how a file creation mask is not a mask. Both times, people have asked in several ways why you think that to even be the case. You did not explain in the deleted question, and you aren't really explaining here. Do not be surprised that the repeated question gains no traction.
    – JdeBP
    yesterday










  • I think I explained it above and the explanation doesn't satisfy you; go on, downvote more and more of my questions. Very helpful and communal.
    – JohnDoea
    yesterday







  • 1




    The only instance of the word "file" from the quoted bash man page is "file-creation" -- you're on the wrong track by assuming that the umask command changes existing file permissions. Try it and see!
    – Jeff Schaller
    1 hour ago
















  • Why do you think that it does?
    – JdeBP
    2 days ago










  • I thinked it might be due to different names and also because I once read about it and didn't find a clear example of a difference (due to lack of background knowledge at the time)... I don't think it's worth discussing...
    – JohnDoea
    yesterday










  • You've asked twice, now, how a file creation mask is not a mask. Both times, people have asked in several ways why you think that to even be the case. You did not explain in the deleted question, and you aren't really explaining here. Do not be surprised that the repeated question gains no traction.
    – JdeBP
    yesterday










  • I think I explained it above and the explanation doesn't satisfy you; go on, downvote more and more of my questions. Very helpful and communal.
    – JohnDoea
    yesterday







  • 1




    The only instance of the word "file" from the quoted bash man page is "file-creation" -- you're on the wrong track by assuming that the umask command changes existing file permissions. Try it and see!
    – Jeff Schaller
    1 hour ago















Why do you think that it does?
– JdeBP
2 days ago




Why do you think that it does?
– JdeBP
2 days ago












I thinked it might be due to different names and also because I once read about it and didn't find a clear example of a difference (due to lack of background knowledge at the time)... I don't think it's worth discussing...
– JohnDoea
yesterday




I thinked it might be due to different names and also because I once read about it and didn't find a clear example of a difference (due to lack of background knowledge at the time)... I don't think it's worth discussing...
– JohnDoea
yesterday












You've asked twice, now, how a file creation mask is not a mask. Both times, people have asked in several ways why you think that to even be the case. You did not explain in the deleted question, and you aren't really explaining here. Do not be surprised that the repeated question gains no traction.
– JdeBP
yesterday




You've asked twice, now, how a file creation mask is not a mask. Both times, people have asked in several ways why you think that to even be the case. You did not explain in the deleted question, and you aren't really explaining here. Do not be surprised that the repeated question gains no traction.
– JdeBP
yesterday












I think I explained it above and the explanation doesn't satisfy you; go on, downvote more and more of my questions. Very helpful and communal.
– JohnDoea
yesterday





I think I explained it above and the explanation doesn't satisfy you; go on, downvote more and more of my questions. Very helpful and communal.
– JohnDoea
yesterday





1




1




The only instance of the word "file" from the quoted bash man page is "file-creation" -- you're on the wrong track by assuming that the umask command changes existing file permissions. Try it and see!
– Jeff Schaller
1 hour ago




The only instance of the word "file" from the quoted bash man page is "file-creation" -- you're on the wrong track by assuming that the umask command changes existing file permissions. Try it and see!
– Jeff Schaller
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













In Linux the default file permission is 0644, default directory permission is 0755 and default umask is 0022.



Now, as the full permission of a file is 0666, the default permission came from (0666 - 0022 = 0644) and for directory it is (0777 - 0022 = 0755).



You can set the mask using #umask 0000, and it will create files and directories with full 666/777 permission (which is very insecure though).






share|improve this answer





























    up vote
    -1
    down vote













    umask is used to set the mask.






    share|improve this answer




















    • Did you mean to say it is a utility ?
      – JohnDoea
      yesterday










    • What i meant to say is you use umask command to set mask permissions.
      – AsenM
      yesterday

















    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote













    In Linux the default file permission is 0644, default directory permission is 0755 and default umask is 0022.



    Now, as the full permission of a file is 0666, the default permission came from (0666 - 0022 = 0644) and for directory it is (0777 - 0022 = 0755).



    You can set the mask using #umask 0000, and it will create files and directories with full 666/777 permission (which is very insecure though).






    share|improve this answer


























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      In Linux the default file permission is 0644, default directory permission is 0755 and default umask is 0022.



      Now, as the full permission of a file is 0666, the default permission came from (0666 - 0022 = 0644) and for directory it is (0777 - 0022 = 0755).



      You can set the mask using #umask 0000, and it will create files and directories with full 666/777 permission (which is very insecure though).






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        In Linux the default file permission is 0644, default directory permission is 0755 and default umask is 0022.



        Now, as the full permission of a file is 0666, the default permission came from (0666 - 0022 = 0644) and for directory it is (0777 - 0022 = 0755).



        You can set the mask using #umask 0000, and it will create files and directories with full 666/777 permission (which is very insecure though).






        share|improve this answer














        In Linux the default file permission is 0644, default directory permission is 0755 and default umask is 0022.



        Now, as the full permission of a file is 0666, the default permission came from (0666 - 0022 = 0644) and for directory it is (0777 - 0022 = 0755).



        You can set the mask using #umask 0000, and it will create files and directories with full 666/777 permission (which is very insecure though).







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited yesterday









        JohnDoea

        98730




        98730










        answered 2 days ago









        al mamun

        5519




        5519






















            up vote
            -1
            down vote













            umask is used to set the mask.






            share|improve this answer




















            • Did you mean to say it is a utility ?
              – JohnDoea
              yesterday










            • What i meant to say is you use umask command to set mask permissions.
              – AsenM
              yesterday














            up vote
            -1
            down vote













            umask is used to set the mask.






            share|improve this answer




















            • Did you mean to say it is a utility ?
              – JohnDoea
              yesterday










            • What i meant to say is you use umask command to set mask permissions.
              – AsenM
              yesterday












            up vote
            -1
            down vote










            up vote
            -1
            down vote









            umask is used to set the mask.






            share|improve this answer












            umask is used to set the mask.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 2 days ago









            AsenM

            3817




            3817











            • Did you mean to say it is a utility ?
              – JohnDoea
              yesterday










            • What i meant to say is you use umask command to set mask permissions.
              – AsenM
              yesterday
















            • Did you mean to say it is a utility ?
              – JohnDoea
              yesterday










            • What i meant to say is you use umask command to set mask permissions.
              – AsenM
              yesterday















            Did you mean to say it is a utility ?
            – JohnDoea
            yesterday




            Did you mean to say it is a utility ?
            – JohnDoea
            yesterday












            What i meant to say is you use umask command to set mask permissions.
            – AsenM
            yesterday




            What i meant to say is you use umask command to set mask permissions.
            – AsenM
            yesterday


            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Bahrain

            Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay