Is it “in” or “on” HNQ?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
7
down vote

favorite
2












Stack Exchange has a special feature that displays the hottest questions from its 170 or more sites across the network, it's called Hot Network Questions or HNQ for short.



Most users will see to their right a short list of “hot” questions but HNQ also has its own page, which complicates things a little, so do the most popular/highest rated questions go on or in HNQ? Do they appear in or on a list?




a question appearing on/in HNQ

a question was on/in HNQ

questions listed in/on HNQ

questions can linger in/on HNQ




I searched the following words on in list preposition in the EL&U archives and this post turned up
When should I use "in" or "on"? the accepted answer said




For my dialect, it's: "good luck on" and "on the list".




Does Alan Hogue's answer suggest there are no fundamental differences?

Are there any differences in usage between American and British English?










share|improve this question

















  • 2




    At least in the US, names are considered to be on the No Fly List (for example). To me (Canada), a name being on a list sounds much more natural than a name being in a list. For what it's worth, Google Books suggests this for both US and UK English.
    – Jason Bassford
    19 hours ago










  • Related: english.stackexchange.com/questions/462053/…
    – user240918
    18 hours ago






  • 1




    What is on HNQ has little to do with what is in HNQ, leaving alone dialectical differences.
    – Kris
    18 hours ago






  • 11




    This question is now in/on HNQ. :)
    – Quintec
    13 hours ago










  • I think I usually say the question has hit the HNQ (though maybe it would be more descriptive to say that the HNQ has hit the question).
    – 1006a
    5 hours ago
















up vote
7
down vote

favorite
2












Stack Exchange has a special feature that displays the hottest questions from its 170 or more sites across the network, it's called Hot Network Questions or HNQ for short.



Most users will see to their right a short list of “hot” questions but HNQ also has its own page, which complicates things a little, so do the most popular/highest rated questions go on or in HNQ? Do they appear in or on a list?




a question appearing on/in HNQ

a question was on/in HNQ

questions listed in/on HNQ

questions can linger in/on HNQ




I searched the following words on in list preposition in the EL&U archives and this post turned up
When should I use "in" or "on"? the accepted answer said




For my dialect, it's: "good luck on" and "on the list".




Does Alan Hogue's answer suggest there are no fundamental differences?

Are there any differences in usage between American and British English?










share|improve this question

















  • 2




    At least in the US, names are considered to be on the No Fly List (for example). To me (Canada), a name being on a list sounds much more natural than a name being in a list. For what it's worth, Google Books suggests this for both US and UK English.
    – Jason Bassford
    19 hours ago










  • Related: english.stackexchange.com/questions/462053/…
    – user240918
    18 hours ago






  • 1




    What is on HNQ has little to do with what is in HNQ, leaving alone dialectical differences.
    – Kris
    18 hours ago






  • 11




    This question is now in/on HNQ. :)
    – Quintec
    13 hours ago










  • I think I usually say the question has hit the HNQ (though maybe it would be more descriptive to say that the HNQ has hit the question).
    – 1006a
    5 hours ago












up vote
7
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
7
down vote

favorite
2






2





Stack Exchange has a special feature that displays the hottest questions from its 170 or more sites across the network, it's called Hot Network Questions or HNQ for short.



Most users will see to their right a short list of “hot” questions but HNQ also has its own page, which complicates things a little, so do the most popular/highest rated questions go on or in HNQ? Do they appear in or on a list?




a question appearing on/in HNQ

a question was on/in HNQ

questions listed in/on HNQ

questions can linger in/on HNQ




I searched the following words on in list preposition in the EL&U archives and this post turned up
When should I use "in" or "on"? the accepted answer said




For my dialect, it's: "good luck on" and "on the list".




Does Alan Hogue's answer suggest there are no fundamental differences?

Are there any differences in usage between American and British English?










share|improve this question













Stack Exchange has a special feature that displays the hottest questions from its 170 or more sites across the network, it's called Hot Network Questions or HNQ for short.



Most users will see to their right a short list of “hot” questions but HNQ also has its own page, which complicates things a little, so do the most popular/highest rated questions go on or in HNQ? Do they appear in or on a list?




a question appearing on/in HNQ

a question was on/in HNQ

questions listed in/on HNQ

questions can linger in/on HNQ




I searched the following words on in list preposition in the EL&U archives and this post turned up
When should I use "in" or "on"? the accepted answer said




For my dialect, it's: "good luck on" and "on the list".




Does Alan Hogue's answer suggest there are no fundamental differences?

Are there any differences in usage between American and British English?







word-choice prepositions american-english british-english






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 19 hours ago









Mari-Lou A

61k54213443




61k54213443







  • 2




    At least in the US, names are considered to be on the No Fly List (for example). To me (Canada), a name being on a list sounds much more natural than a name being in a list. For what it's worth, Google Books suggests this for both US and UK English.
    – Jason Bassford
    19 hours ago










  • Related: english.stackexchange.com/questions/462053/…
    – user240918
    18 hours ago






  • 1




    What is on HNQ has little to do with what is in HNQ, leaving alone dialectical differences.
    – Kris
    18 hours ago






  • 11




    This question is now in/on HNQ. :)
    – Quintec
    13 hours ago










  • I think I usually say the question has hit the HNQ (though maybe it would be more descriptive to say that the HNQ has hit the question).
    – 1006a
    5 hours ago












  • 2




    At least in the US, names are considered to be on the No Fly List (for example). To me (Canada), a name being on a list sounds much more natural than a name being in a list. For what it's worth, Google Books suggests this for both US and UK English.
    – Jason Bassford
    19 hours ago










  • Related: english.stackexchange.com/questions/462053/…
    – user240918
    18 hours ago






  • 1




    What is on HNQ has little to do with what is in HNQ, leaving alone dialectical differences.
    – Kris
    18 hours ago






  • 11




    This question is now in/on HNQ. :)
    – Quintec
    13 hours ago










  • I think I usually say the question has hit the HNQ (though maybe it would be more descriptive to say that the HNQ has hit the question).
    – 1006a
    5 hours ago







2




2




At least in the US, names are considered to be on the No Fly List (for example). To me (Canada), a name being on a list sounds much more natural than a name being in a list. For what it's worth, Google Books suggests this for both US and UK English.
– Jason Bassford
19 hours ago




At least in the US, names are considered to be on the No Fly List (for example). To me (Canada), a name being on a list sounds much more natural than a name being in a list. For what it's worth, Google Books suggests this for both US and UK English.
– Jason Bassford
19 hours ago












Related: english.stackexchange.com/questions/462053/…
– user240918
18 hours ago




Related: english.stackexchange.com/questions/462053/…
– user240918
18 hours ago




1




1




What is on HNQ has little to do with what is in HNQ, leaving alone dialectical differences.
– Kris
18 hours ago




What is on HNQ has little to do with what is in HNQ, leaving alone dialectical differences.
– Kris
18 hours ago




11




11




This question is now in/on HNQ. :)
– Quintec
13 hours ago




This question is now in/on HNQ. :)
– Quintec
13 hours ago












I think I usually say the question has hit the HNQ (though maybe it would be more descriptive to say that the HNQ has hit the question).
– 1006a
5 hours ago




I think I usually say the question has hit the HNQ (though maybe it would be more descriptive to say that the HNQ has hit the question).
– 1006a
5 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
10
down vote



accepted










Flipping over to Google Ngram it appears that in the list and on the list are used fairly equally with little difference between BrE and AmE.



Myself, as a BrE user, I would speak of items in the HNQ list that is on the HNQ page.



One of the problems with prepositions is that they are polysemous, some argue so polysemous that they effectively have no meaning - delexicalised - and others (I remember Lakoff being one) suggested a 'prototypes' approach in which each preposition has some core characteristic that is present in all uses. Lindstromberg tried to apply this to 'on' and concluded that he couldn't even begin to find a core characteristic that would embrace both "on the table" and "the car sped on".



Despite this, I think the prototype idea has merit. In a box and in trouble both suggest being surrounded, and so does in a list. Yet people do say on the guest list and on the no fly list. Both of these seem to be connected with permission, either granting it or refusing it. Maybe it is taking in a sense of 'invitation' (or 'anti-invitation', whatever one of those is called), so a name is on the invitation as in printed on its surface, or on a ticket, and this is being transferred to on a list if that list gives or refuses permission to enter.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    I would suggest that in "the car sped on", the word "on" plays the role of an adverb, regardless of what part of speech it is defined as.
    – Walter Mitty
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    As an American, I can't think of a situation where I would describe anything as "in" a list of any kind. For example, bananas might be on my shopping list. Perhaps it's purely regional?
    – Kamil Drakari
    11 hours ago










  • Your Ngram might be more useful with more context. Comparing phrases like "is in/on the list" and a person/an item on the list" suggests some distinct differences in how we use "on a list" vs "in a list".
    – 1006a
    6 hours ago










  • books.google.com/ngrams/…
    – 1006a
    6 hours ago










  • How do you you get a person to be on HNQ? Ngram is kind of 'quick 'n' dirty', a slight improvement on just counting hits in Google. It is easy to use, draws a graph, and gives a general guideline but it is not really a corpus. If I were making comparisons such as you suggest, I would be on BNC or similar.
    – Roaring Fish
    5 hours ago


















up vote
3
down vote













I believe it is "On" because here we are dealing with HNQ as a position where the question is located. So, we say:



The most popular/highest rated questions on HNQ.



Exactly as we say "the most popular series on HBO", or "a question on page 12".






share|improve this answer








New contributor




H. Ibrahim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    It depends on what type of object you infer HNQ to be.



    If you infer HNQ as HNQ (list), then, as a collection or set, the correct usage is "in the HNQ (list)."



    If you infer HNQ as HNQ (page), then, as a surface, the correct usage is "on the HNQ (page)." The only time this is applicable is if you are referring to the panel/surface area/page that the HNQ (List) resides on.



    The problem seems to be that just saying HNQ is ambiguous, even though it probably shouldn't be. When you look at the acronym, the noun is Questions, which is a set of singular questions. This should preempt any ambiguity as the base type is a set of questions. Individual questions are either in the set or not in the set. Without additional qualifiers such as page, (List) should be the default interpretation.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 3




      some users say "on the HNQ (list)"
      – Mari-Lou A
      12 hours ago











    • Something is still missing. My name is in the phonebook but is on Santa's Nice List. Both are sets or collections but it just does not sound right to be on the phonebook or in Santa's list.
      – Michael J.
      11 hours ago










    • @MichaelJ. You probably internally interpret a phonebook as a set of individual phone numbers rather than a single surface. Santa's list is traditionally described as a long physical page which contains a list, so there can be ambiguity when describing a physical page that's titled, "Santa's list": are you referring to the page that contains a list or the actual list? Both are reasonably assumed in that situation.
      – Physics-Compute
      9 hours ago










    • @Physics-Compute: I almost upvoted you for “It depends on what type of object you infer HNQ to be.” / “If you infer HNQ … as a collection or set, the correct usage is "in the HNQ …." ”  But then I saw that you support “in the HNQ (list).”, and I disagree — it’s on a list.  And I really disagree with your comment “You probably internally interpret a phonebook as a set of individual phone numbers rather than a single surface.”  It’s always in for a book (unless you put your coffee mug on a book because you can’t find a coaster).  … (Cont’d)
      – Scott
      7 hours ago










    • (Cont’d) …  See John Lawler’s answer about surfaces and containers, and this and this.  … … … … … … … … … … … … … @MichaelJ. These are also for you.
      – Scott
      7 hours ago


















    up vote
    -1
    down vote













    @H.Ibrahim
    Is it a position ON which the question is located?



    I would prefer a position AT which the question is located.



    Could it not be a region IN which the question is located?






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    user2912891 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.

















    • Is this an answer to my question? This looks more like a comment. I'm afraid you need 50 reputation points before you can comment anywhere your heart pleases. For more info see: Why do I need 50 reputation to comment? What can I do instead?
      – Mari-Lou A
      12 hours ago











    • This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
      – jimm101
      1 hour ago










    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f472583%2fis-it-in-or-on-hnq%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    10
    down vote



    accepted










    Flipping over to Google Ngram it appears that in the list and on the list are used fairly equally with little difference between BrE and AmE.



    Myself, as a BrE user, I would speak of items in the HNQ list that is on the HNQ page.



    One of the problems with prepositions is that they are polysemous, some argue so polysemous that they effectively have no meaning - delexicalised - and others (I remember Lakoff being one) suggested a 'prototypes' approach in which each preposition has some core characteristic that is present in all uses. Lindstromberg tried to apply this to 'on' and concluded that he couldn't even begin to find a core characteristic that would embrace both "on the table" and "the car sped on".



    Despite this, I think the prototype idea has merit. In a box and in trouble both suggest being surrounded, and so does in a list. Yet people do say on the guest list and on the no fly list. Both of these seem to be connected with permission, either granting it or refusing it. Maybe it is taking in a sense of 'invitation' (or 'anti-invitation', whatever one of those is called), so a name is on the invitation as in printed on its surface, or on a ticket, and this is being transferred to on a list if that list gives or refuses permission to enter.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1




      I would suggest that in "the car sped on", the word "on" plays the role of an adverb, regardless of what part of speech it is defined as.
      – Walter Mitty
      11 hours ago






    • 1




      As an American, I can't think of a situation where I would describe anything as "in" a list of any kind. For example, bananas might be on my shopping list. Perhaps it's purely regional?
      – Kamil Drakari
      11 hours ago










    • Your Ngram might be more useful with more context. Comparing phrases like "is in/on the list" and a person/an item on the list" suggests some distinct differences in how we use "on a list" vs "in a list".
      – 1006a
      6 hours ago










    • books.google.com/ngrams/…
      – 1006a
      6 hours ago










    • How do you you get a person to be on HNQ? Ngram is kind of 'quick 'n' dirty', a slight improvement on just counting hits in Google. It is easy to use, draws a graph, and gives a general guideline but it is not really a corpus. If I were making comparisons such as you suggest, I would be on BNC or similar.
      – Roaring Fish
      5 hours ago















    up vote
    10
    down vote



    accepted










    Flipping over to Google Ngram it appears that in the list and on the list are used fairly equally with little difference between BrE and AmE.



    Myself, as a BrE user, I would speak of items in the HNQ list that is on the HNQ page.



    One of the problems with prepositions is that they are polysemous, some argue so polysemous that they effectively have no meaning - delexicalised - and others (I remember Lakoff being one) suggested a 'prototypes' approach in which each preposition has some core characteristic that is present in all uses. Lindstromberg tried to apply this to 'on' and concluded that he couldn't even begin to find a core characteristic that would embrace both "on the table" and "the car sped on".



    Despite this, I think the prototype idea has merit. In a box and in trouble both suggest being surrounded, and so does in a list. Yet people do say on the guest list and on the no fly list. Both of these seem to be connected with permission, either granting it or refusing it. Maybe it is taking in a sense of 'invitation' (or 'anti-invitation', whatever one of those is called), so a name is on the invitation as in printed on its surface, or on a ticket, and this is being transferred to on a list if that list gives or refuses permission to enter.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1




      I would suggest that in "the car sped on", the word "on" plays the role of an adverb, regardless of what part of speech it is defined as.
      – Walter Mitty
      11 hours ago






    • 1




      As an American, I can't think of a situation where I would describe anything as "in" a list of any kind. For example, bananas might be on my shopping list. Perhaps it's purely regional?
      – Kamil Drakari
      11 hours ago










    • Your Ngram might be more useful with more context. Comparing phrases like "is in/on the list" and a person/an item on the list" suggests some distinct differences in how we use "on a list" vs "in a list".
      – 1006a
      6 hours ago










    • books.google.com/ngrams/…
      – 1006a
      6 hours ago










    • How do you you get a person to be on HNQ? Ngram is kind of 'quick 'n' dirty', a slight improvement on just counting hits in Google. It is easy to use, draws a graph, and gives a general guideline but it is not really a corpus. If I were making comparisons such as you suggest, I would be on BNC or similar.
      – Roaring Fish
      5 hours ago













    up vote
    10
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    10
    down vote



    accepted






    Flipping over to Google Ngram it appears that in the list and on the list are used fairly equally with little difference between BrE and AmE.



    Myself, as a BrE user, I would speak of items in the HNQ list that is on the HNQ page.



    One of the problems with prepositions is that they are polysemous, some argue so polysemous that they effectively have no meaning - delexicalised - and others (I remember Lakoff being one) suggested a 'prototypes' approach in which each preposition has some core characteristic that is present in all uses. Lindstromberg tried to apply this to 'on' and concluded that he couldn't even begin to find a core characteristic that would embrace both "on the table" and "the car sped on".



    Despite this, I think the prototype idea has merit. In a box and in trouble both suggest being surrounded, and so does in a list. Yet people do say on the guest list and on the no fly list. Both of these seem to be connected with permission, either granting it or refusing it. Maybe it is taking in a sense of 'invitation' (or 'anti-invitation', whatever one of those is called), so a name is on the invitation as in printed on its surface, or on a ticket, and this is being transferred to on a list if that list gives or refuses permission to enter.






    share|improve this answer














    Flipping over to Google Ngram it appears that in the list and on the list are used fairly equally with little difference between BrE and AmE.



    Myself, as a BrE user, I would speak of items in the HNQ list that is on the HNQ page.



    One of the problems with prepositions is that they are polysemous, some argue so polysemous that they effectively have no meaning - delexicalised - and others (I remember Lakoff being one) suggested a 'prototypes' approach in which each preposition has some core characteristic that is present in all uses. Lindstromberg tried to apply this to 'on' and concluded that he couldn't even begin to find a core characteristic that would embrace both "on the table" and "the car sped on".



    Despite this, I think the prototype idea has merit. In a box and in trouble both suggest being surrounded, and so does in a list. Yet people do say on the guest list and on the no fly list. Both of these seem to be connected with permission, either granting it or refusing it. Maybe it is taking in a sense of 'invitation' (or 'anti-invitation', whatever one of those is called), so a name is on the invitation as in printed on its surface, or on a ticket, and this is being transferred to on a list if that list gives or refuses permission to enter.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 10 hours ago









    Laurel

    28.6k654103




    28.6k654103










    answered 15 hours ago









    Roaring Fish

    14.1k12353




    14.1k12353







    • 1




      I would suggest that in "the car sped on", the word "on" plays the role of an adverb, regardless of what part of speech it is defined as.
      – Walter Mitty
      11 hours ago






    • 1




      As an American, I can't think of a situation where I would describe anything as "in" a list of any kind. For example, bananas might be on my shopping list. Perhaps it's purely regional?
      – Kamil Drakari
      11 hours ago










    • Your Ngram might be more useful with more context. Comparing phrases like "is in/on the list" and a person/an item on the list" suggests some distinct differences in how we use "on a list" vs "in a list".
      – 1006a
      6 hours ago










    • books.google.com/ngrams/…
      – 1006a
      6 hours ago










    • How do you you get a person to be on HNQ? Ngram is kind of 'quick 'n' dirty', a slight improvement on just counting hits in Google. It is easy to use, draws a graph, and gives a general guideline but it is not really a corpus. If I were making comparisons such as you suggest, I would be on BNC or similar.
      – Roaring Fish
      5 hours ago













    • 1




      I would suggest that in "the car sped on", the word "on" plays the role of an adverb, regardless of what part of speech it is defined as.
      – Walter Mitty
      11 hours ago






    • 1




      As an American, I can't think of a situation where I would describe anything as "in" a list of any kind. For example, bananas might be on my shopping list. Perhaps it's purely regional?
      – Kamil Drakari
      11 hours ago










    • Your Ngram might be more useful with more context. Comparing phrases like "is in/on the list" and a person/an item on the list" suggests some distinct differences in how we use "on a list" vs "in a list".
      – 1006a
      6 hours ago










    • books.google.com/ngrams/…
      – 1006a
      6 hours ago










    • How do you you get a person to be on HNQ? Ngram is kind of 'quick 'n' dirty', a slight improvement on just counting hits in Google. It is easy to use, draws a graph, and gives a general guideline but it is not really a corpus. If I were making comparisons such as you suggest, I would be on BNC or similar.
      – Roaring Fish
      5 hours ago








    1




    1




    I would suggest that in "the car sped on", the word "on" plays the role of an adverb, regardless of what part of speech it is defined as.
    – Walter Mitty
    11 hours ago




    I would suggest that in "the car sped on", the word "on" plays the role of an adverb, regardless of what part of speech it is defined as.
    – Walter Mitty
    11 hours ago




    1




    1




    As an American, I can't think of a situation where I would describe anything as "in" a list of any kind. For example, bananas might be on my shopping list. Perhaps it's purely regional?
    – Kamil Drakari
    11 hours ago




    As an American, I can't think of a situation where I would describe anything as "in" a list of any kind. For example, bananas might be on my shopping list. Perhaps it's purely regional?
    – Kamil Drakari
    11 hours ago












    Your Ngram might be more useful with more context. Comparing phrases like "is in/on the list" and a person/an item on the list" suggests some distinct differences in how we use "on a list" vs "in a list".
    – 1006a
    6 hours ago




    Your Ngram might be more useful with more context. Comparing phrases like "is in/on the list" and a person/an item on the list" suggests some distinct differences in how we use "on a list" vs "in a list".
    – 1006a
    6 hours ago












    books.google.com/ngrams/…
    – 1006a
    6 hours ago




    books.google.com/ngrams/…
    – 1006a
    6 hours ago












    How do you you get a person to be on HNQ? Ngram is kind of 'quick 'n' dirty', a slight improvement on just counting hits in Google. It is easy to use, draws a graph, and gives a general guideline but it is not really a corpus. If I were making comparisons such as you suggest, I would be on BNC or similar.
    – Roaring Fish
    5 hours ago





    How do you you get a person to be on HNQ? Ngram is kind of 'quick 'n' dirty', a slight improvement on just counting hits in Google. It is easy to use, draws a graph, and gives a general guideline but it is not really a corpus. If I were making comparisons such as you suggest, I would be on BNC or similar.
    – Roaring Fish
    5 hours ago













    up vote
    3
    down vote













    I believe it is "On" because here we are dealing with HNQ as a position where the question is located. So, we say:



    The most popular/highest rated questions on HNQ.



    Exactly as we say "the most popular series on HBO", or "a question on page 12".






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    H. Ibrahim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















      up vote
      3
      down vote













      I believe it is "On" because here we are dealing with HNQ as a position where the question is located. So, we say:



      The most popular/highest rated questions on HNQ.



      Exactly as we say "the most popular series on HBO", or "a question on page 12".






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      H. Ibrahim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.



















        up vote
        3
        down vote










        up vote
        3
        down vote









        I believe it is "On" because here we are dealing with HNQ as a position where the question is located. So, we say:



        The most popular/highest rated questions on HNQ.



        Exactly as we say "the most popular series on HBO", or "a question on page 12".






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        H. Ibrahim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        I believe it is "On" because here we are dealing with HNQ as a position where the question is located. So, we say:



        The most popular/highest rated questions on HNQ.



        Exactly as we say "the most popular series on HBO", or "a question on page 12".







        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        H. Ibrahim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer






        New contributor




        H. Ibrahim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered 18 hours ago









        H. Ibrahim

        313




        313




        New contributor




        H. Ibrahim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        H. Ibrahim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        H. Ibrahim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.




















            up vote
            0
            down vote













            It depends on what type of object you infer HNQ to be.



            If you infer HNQ as HNQ (list), then, as a collection or set, the correct usage is "in the HNQ (list)."



            If you infer HNQ as HNQ (page), then, as a surface, the correct usage is "on the HNQ (page)." The only time this is applicable is if you are referring to the panel/surface area/page that the HNQ (List) resides on.



            The problem seems to be that just saying HNQ is ambiguous, even though it probably shouldn't be. When you look at the acronym, the noun is Questions, which is a set of singular questions. This should preempt any ambiguity as the base type is a set of questions. Individual questions are either in the set or not in the set. Without additional qualifiers such as page, (List) should be the default interpretation.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 3




              some users say "on the HNQ (list)"
              – Mari-Lou A
              12 hours ago











            • Something is still missing. My name is in the phonebook but is on Santa's Nice List. Both are sets or collections but it just does not sound right to be on the phonebook or in Santa's list.
              – Michael J.
              11 hours ago










            • @MichaelJ. You probably internally interpret a phonebook as a set of individual phone numbers rather than a single surface. Santa's list is traditionally described as a long physical page which contains a list, so there can be ambiguity when describing a physical page that's titled, "Santa's list": are you referring to the page that contains a list or the actual list? Both are reasonably assumed in that situation.
              – Physics-Compute
              9 hours ago










            • @Physics-Compute: I almost upvoted you for “It depends on what type of object you infer HNQ to be.” / “If you infer HNQ … as a collection or set, the correct usage is "in the HNQ …." ”  But then I saw that you support “in the HNQ (list).”, and I disagree — it’s on a list.  And I really disagree with your comment “You probably internally interpret a phonebook as a set of individual phone numbers rather than a single surface.”  It’s always in for a book (unless you put your coffee mug on a book because you can’t find a coaster).  … (Cont’d)
              – Scott
              7 hours ago










            • (Cont’d) …  See John Lawler’s answer about surfaces and containers, and this and this.  … … … … … … … … … … … … … @MichaelJ. These are also for you.
              – Scott
              7 hours ago















            up vote
            0
            down vote













            It depends on what type of object you infer HNQ to be.



            If you infer HNQ as HNQ (list), then, as a collection or set, the correct usage is "in the HNQ (list)."



            If you infer HNQ as HNQ (page), then, as a surface, the correct usage is "on the HNQ (page)." The only time this is applicable is if you are referring to the panel/surface area/page that the HNQ (List) resides on.



            The problem seems to be that just saying HNQ is ambiguous, even though it probably shouldn't be. When you look at the acronym, the noun is Questions, which is a set of singular questions. This should preempt any ambiguity as the base type is a set of questions. Individual questions are either in the set or not in the set. Without additional qualifiers such as page, (List) should be the default interpretation.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 3




              some users say "on the HNQ (list)"
              – Mari-Lou A
              12 hours ago











            • Something is still missing. My name is in the phonebook but is on Santa's Nice List. Both are sets or collections but it just does not sound right to be on the phonebook or in Santa's list.
              – Michael J.
              11 hours ago










            • @MichaelJ. You probably internally interpret a phonebook as a set of individual phone numbers rather than a single surface. Santa's list is traditionally described as a long physical page which contains a list, so there can be ambiguity when describing a physical page that's titled, "Santa's list": are you referring to the page that contains a list or the actual list? Both are reasonably assumed in that situation.
              – Physics-Compute
              9 hours ago










            • @Physics-Compute: I almost upvoted you for “It depends on what type of object you infer HNQ to be.” / “If you infer HNQ … as a collection or set, the correct usage is "in the HNQ …." ”  But then I saw that you support “in the HNQ (list).”, and I disagree — it’s on a list.  And I really disagree with your comment “You probably internally interpret a phonebook as a set of individual phone numbers rather than a single surface.”  It’s always in for a book (unless you put your coffee mug on a book because you can’t find a coaster).  … (Cont’d)
              – Scott
              7 hours ago










            • (Cont’d) …  See John Lawler’s answer about surfaces and containers, and this and this.  … … … … … … … … … … … … … @MichaelJ. These are also for you.
              – Scott
              7 hours ago













            up vote
            0
            down vote










            up vote
            0
            down vote









            It depends on what type of object you infer HNQ to be.



            If you infer HNQ as HNQ (list), then, as a collection or set, the correct usage is "in the HNQ (list)."



            If you infer HNQ as HNQ (page), then, as a surface, the correct usage is "on the HNQ (page)." The only time this is applicable is if you are referring to the panel/surface area/page that the HNQ (List) resides on.



            The problem seems to be that just saying HNQ is ambiguous, even though it probably shouldn't be. When you look at the acronym, the noun is Questions, which is a set of singular questions. This should preempt any ambiguity as the base type is a set of questions. Individual questions are either in the set or not in the set. Without additional qualifiers such as page, (List) should be the default interpretation.






            share|improve this answer














            It depends on what type of object you infer HNQ to be.



            If you infer HNQ as HNQ (list), then, as a collection or set, the correct usage is "in the HNQ (list)."



            If you infer HNQ as HNQ (page), then, as a surface, the correct usage is "on the HNQ (page)." The only time this is applicable is if you are referring to the panel/surface area/page that the HNQ (List) resides on.



            The problem seems to be that just saying HNQ is ambiguous, even though it probably shouldn't be. When you look at the acronym, the noun is Questions, which is a set of singular questions. This should preempt any ambiguity as the base type is a set of questions. Individual questions are either in the set or not in the set. Without additional qualifiers such as page, (List) should be the default interpretation.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 9 hours ago

























            answered 12 hours ago









            Physics-Compute

            497412




            497412







            • 3




              some users say "on the HNQ (list)"
              – Mari-Lou A
              12 hours ago











            • Something is still missing. My name is in the phonebook but is on Santa's Nice List. Both are sets or collections but it just does not sound right to be on the phonebook or in Santa's list.
              – Michael J.
              11 hours ago










            • @MichaelJ. You probably internally interpret a phonebook as a set of individual phone numbers rather than a single surface. Santa's list is traditionally described as a long physical page which contains a list, so there can be ambiguity when describing a physical page that's titled, "Santa's list": are you referring to the page that contains a list or the actual list? Both are reasonably assumed in that situation.
              – Physics-Compute
              9 hours ago










            • @Physics-Compute: I almost upvoted you for “It depends on what type of object you infer HNQ to be.” / “If you infer HNQ … as a collection or set, the correct usage is "in the HNQ …." ”  But then I saw that you support “in the HNQ (list).”, and I disagree — it’s on a list.  And I really disagree with your comment “You probably internally interpret a phonebook as a set of individual phone numbers rather than a single surface.”  It’s always in for a book (unless you put your coffee mug on a book because you can’t find a coaster).  … (Cont’d)
              – Scott
              7 hours ago










            • (Cont’d) …  See John Lawler’s answer about surfaces and containers, and this and this.  … … … … … … … … … … … … … @MichaelJ. These are also for you.
              – Scott
              7 hours ago













            • 3




              some users say "on the HNQ (list)"
              – Mari-Lou A
              12 hours ago











            • Something is still missing. My name is in the phonebook but is on Santa's Nice List. Both are sets or collections but it just does not sound right to be on the phonebook or in Santa's list.
              – Michael J.
              11 hours ago










            • @MichaelJ. You probably internally interpret a phonebook as a set of individual phone numbers rather than a single surface. Santa's list is traditionally described as a long physical page which contains a list, so there can be ambiguity when describing a physical page that's titled, "Santa's list": are you referring to the page that contains a list or the actual list? Both are reasonably assumed in that situation.
              – Physics-Compute
              9 hours ago










            • @Physics-Compute: I almost upvoted you for “It depends on what type of object you infer HNQ to be.” / “If you infer HNQ … as a collection or set, the correct usage is "in the HNQ …." ”  But then I saw that you support “in the HNQ (list).”, and I disagree — it’s on a list.  And I really disagree with your comment “You probably internally interpret a phonebook as a set of individual phone numbers rather than a single surface.”  It’s always in for a book (unless you put your coffee mug on a book because you can’t find a coaster).  … (Cont’d)
              – Scott
              7 hours ago










            • (Cont’d) …  See John Lawler’s answer about surfaces and containers, and this and this.  … … … … … … … … … … … … … @MichaelJ. These are also for you.
              – Scott
              7 hours ago








            3




            3




            some users say "on the HNQ (list)"
            – Mari-Lou A
            12 hours ago





            some users say "on the HNQ (list)"
            – Mari-Lou A
            12 hours ago













            Something is still missing. My name is in the phonebook but is on Santa's Nice List. Both are sets or collections but it just does not sound right to be on the phonebook or in Santa's list.
            – Michael J.
            11 hours ago




            Something is still missing. My name is in the phonebook but is on Santa's Nice List. Both are sets or collections but it just does not sound right to be on the phonebook or in Santa's list.
            – Michael J.
            11 hours ago












            @MichaelJ. You probably internally interpret a phonebook as a set of individual phone numbers rather than a single surface. Santa's list is traditionally described as a long physical page which contains a list, so there can be ambiguity when describing a physical page that's titled, "Santa's list": are you referring to the page that contains a list or the actual list? Both are reasonably assumed in that situation.
            – Physics-Compute
            9 hours ago




            @MichaelJ. You probably internally interpret a phonebook as a set of individual phone numbers rather than a single surface. Santa's list is traditionally described as a long physical page which contains a list, so there can be ambiguity when describing a physical page that's titled, "Santa's list": are you referring to the page that contains a list or the actual list? Both are reasonably assumed in that situation.
            – Physics-Compute
            9 hours ago












            @Physics-Compute: I almost upvoted you for “It depends on what type of object you infer HNQ to be.” / “If you infer HNQ … as a collection or set, the correct usage is "in the HNQ …." ”  But then I saw that you support “in the HNQ (list).”, and I disagree — it’s on a list.  And I really disagree with your comment “You probably internally interpret a phonebook as a set of individual phone numbers rather than a single surface.”  It’s always in for a book (unless you put your coffee mug on a book because you can’t find a coaster).  … (Cont’d)
            – Scott
            7 hours ago




            @Physics-Compute: I almost upvoted you for “It depends on what type of object you infer HNQ to be.” / “If you infer HNQ … as a collection or set, the correct usage is "in the HNQ …." ”  But then I saw that you support “in the HNQ (list).”, and I disagree — it’s on a list.  And I really disagree with your comment “You probably internally interpret a phonebook as a set of individual phone numbers rather than a single surface.”  It’s always in for a book (unless you put your coffee mug on a book because you can’t find a coaster).  … (Cont’d)
            – Scott
            7 hours ago












            (Cont’d) …  See John Lawler’s answer about surfaces and containers, and this and this.  … … … … … … … … … … … … … @MichaelJ. These are also for you.
            – Scott
            7 hours ago





            (Cont’d) …  See John Lawler’s answer about surfaces and containers, and this and this.  … … … … … … … … … … … … … @MichaelJ. These are also for you.
            – Scott
            7 hours ago











            up vote
            -1
            down vote













            @H.Ibrahim
            Is it a position ON which the question is located?



            I would prefer a position AT which the question is located.



            Could it not be a region IN which the question is located?






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            user2912891 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.

















            • Is this an answer to my question? This looks more like a comment. I'm afraid you need 50 reputation points before you can comment anywhere your heart pleases. For more info see: Why do I need 50 reputation to comment? What can I do instead?
              – Mari-Lou A
              12 hours ago











            • This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
              – jimm101
              1 hour ago














            up vote
            -1
            down vote













            @H.Ibrahim
            Is it a position ON which the question is located?



            I would prefer a position AT which the question is located.



            Could it not be a region IN which the question is located?






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            user2912891 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.

















            • Is this an answer to my question? This looks more like a comment. I'm afraid you need 50 reputation points before you can comment anywhere your heart pleases. For more info see: Why do I need 50 reputation to comment? What can I do instead?
              – Mari-Lou A
              12 hours ago











            • This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
              – jimm101
              1 hour ago












            up vote
            -1
            down vote










            up vote
            -1
            down vote









            @H.Ibrahim
            Is it a position ON which the question is located?



            I would prefer a position AT which the question is located.



            Could it not be a region IN which the question is located?






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            user2912891 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            @H.Ibrahim
            Is it a position ON which the question is located?



            I would prefer a position AT which the question is located.



            Could it not be a region IN which the question is located?







            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            user2912891 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer






            New contributor




            user2912891 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            answered 12 hours ago









            user2912891

            1




            1




            New contributor




            user2912891 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            New contributor





            user2912891 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            user2912891 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.











            • Is this an answer to my question? This looks more like a comment. I'm afraid you need 50 reputation points before you can comment anywhere your heart pleases. For more info see: Why do I need 50 reputation to comment? What can I do instead?
              – Mari-Lou A
              12 hours ago











            • This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
              – jimm101
              1 hour ago
















            • Is this an answer to my question? This looks more like a comment. I'm afraid you need 50 reputation points before you can comment anywhere your heart pleases. For more info see: Why do I need 50 reputation to comment? What can I do instead?
              – Mari-Lou A
              12 hours ago











            • This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
              – jimm101
              1 hour ago















            Is this an answer to my question? This looks more like a comment. I'm afraid you need 50 reputation points before you can comment anywhere your heart pleases. For more info see: Why do I need 50 reputation to comment? What can I do instead?
            – Mari-Lou A
            12 hours ago





            Is this an answer to my question? This looks more like a comment. I'm afraid you need 50 reputation points before you can comment anywhere your heart pleases. For more info see: Why do I need 50 reputation to comment? What can I do instead?
            – Mari-Lou A
            12 hours ago













            This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
            – jimm101
            1 hour ago




            This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
            – jimm101
            1 hour ago

















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f472583%2fis-it-in-or-on-hnq%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Bahrain

            Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay