Did Grandpa count correctly? Another Grandpa Mystery

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
5
down vote

favorite












Grandpa just returned from a long trip. He started telling me about his adventure in a wild place.




" I saw animals", he said. "Three different kind"



"Just for fun I counted their limbs"



"You mean legs" I interrupted



" Yeah whatever. There were 26 total animals of 3 different kind. And
I counted 26 legs for the 26 animals.



The total number of first kind of animal was 8 times the second kind
and 2 times the third kind.



Can you guess what kind of animals I saw and how many of each were
there?



And where was I?



By the way, there were no one legged or disabled animals there, just to
be clear




Did he count correctly?










share|improve this question

























    up vote
    5
    down vote

    favorite












    Grandpa just returned from a long trip. He started telling me about his adventure in a wild place.




    " I saw animals", he said. "Three different kind"



    "Just for fun I counted their limbs"



    "You mean legs" I interrupted



    " Yeah whatever. There were 26 total animals of 3 different kind. And
    I counted 26 legs for the 26 animals.



    The total number of first kind of animal was 8 times the second kind
    and 2 times the third kind.



    Can you guess what kind of animals I saw and how many of each were
    there?



    And where was I?



    By the way, there were no one legged or disabled animals there, just to
    be clear




    Did he count correctly?










    share|improve this question























      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite











      Grandpa just returned from a long trip. He started telling me about his adventure in a wild place.




      " I saw animals", he said. "Three different kind"



      "Just for fun I counted their limbs"



      "You mean legs" I interrupted



      " Yeah whatever. There were 26 total animals of 3 different kind. And
      I counted 26 legs for the 26 animals.



      The total number of first kind of animal was 8 times the second kind
      and 2 times the third kind.



      Can you guess what kind of animals I saw and how many of each were
      there?



      And where was I?



      By the way, there were no one legged or disabled animals there, just to
      be clear




      Did he count correctly?










      share|improve this question













      Grandpa just returned from a long trip. He started telling me about his adventure in a wild place.




      " I saw animals", he said. "Three different kind"



      "Just for fun I counted their limbs"



      "You mean legs" I interrupted



      " Yeah whatever. There were 26 total animals of 3 different kind. And
      I counted 26 legs for the 26 animals.



      The total number of first kind of animal was 8 times the second kind
      and 2 times the third kind.



      Can you guess what kind of animals I saw and how many of each were
      there?



      And where was I?



      By the way, there were no one legged or disabled animals there, just to
      be clear




      Did he count correctly?







      riddle mathematics no-computers






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Sep 30 at 23:52









      DEEM

      3,9921076




      3,9921076




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted










          Well, I'd say Grandpa was in




          Australia




          And he saw




          16, 8 and 2 animals of three types. Why?


          assume the least number was 1. That makes the largest number 8 and the middle 4. That's 13, so we should double each number for 16, 8, 2.




          Of which




          the 16 can't have two legs (more than 26) and no one legged animals, so they have 0 legs (snakes?)

          The 8 can't have 3 legs, because the 2 would have to be one legged, so the 8 have 2 legs/limbs. This could be a wingless bird like a Kiwi. (ok, it has wings but they are so small they are invisible and Grandpa wouldn't have seen them)

          The 2 have 5 limbs, therefore. Which a Kangaroo is considered to have, counting it's tail (hence Australia)







          share|improve this answer


















          • 1




            Also, rot13[Ur fnj 26 navznyf, 16 bs juvpu jrer fanxrf. Vs gung qbrfa'g qrfpevor Nhfgenyvn V qba'g xabj jung qbrf.]
            – jafe
            Oct 1 at 11:06

















          up vote
          6
          down vote













          Ok, so he said he counted 26 animals



          We have that




          • number of type 1 = n
          • number of type 2 = n/8
          • number of type 3 = n/2

          n + n/8 + n/2 = 26, therefore n = 16




          so he saw:




          • 16 of type 1
          • 2 of type 2
          • 8 of type 3




          But what were they?




          He saw 16 type 1's, and saw no one legged animals; if type 1 had 2 legs, the minimum allowable, he'd have seen 32 limbs; too many already. So, type 1 has no legs, must be a snake or fish.




          from that we have




          (2*x)+(8*y) = 26. Logical numbers are 2 and 4; lets plug them in: 2*4 + 8*2 = 24 thats too low; but if we add 2 legs to either we blow it out...




          but he originally said




          limbs, so thats not necessarily in pairs... 2*5 + 8*2 is just right




          Thus, he saw




          16 snakes, fish or other zero-limbed creatures
          2 five-limbed creatures. I'm going with starfish, but spider-monkeys with prehensile tails could be another contender
          8 two-limbed creatures, this could be anything; flamingoes, chickens etc.







          share|improve this answer






















          • thanks el-guest; man i'm struggling with spoilerised paragraphs; what a pain!
            – crcroberts
            Oct 1 at 0:18










          • Great Logic @crcroberts. But "Where was I?" was the question he asked.
            – DEEM
            Oct 1 at 11:46










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "559"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f73263%2fdid-grandpa-count-correctly-another-grandpa-mystery%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted










          Well, I'd say Grandpa was in




          Australia




          And he saw




          16, 8 and 2 animals of three types. Why?


          assume the least number was 1. That makes the largest number 8 and the middle 4. That's 13, so we should double each number for 16, 8, 2.




          Of which




          the 16 can't have two legs (more than 26) and no one legged animals, so they have 0 legs (snakes?)

          The 8 can't have 3 legs, because the 2 would have to be one legged, so the 8 have 2 legs/limbs. This could be a wingless bird like a Kiwi. (ok, it has wings but they are so small they are invisible and Grandpa wouldn't have seen them)

          The 2 have 5 limbs, therefore. Which a Kangaroo is considered to have, counting it's tail (hence Australia)







          share|improve this answer


















          • 1




            Also, rot13[Ur fnj 26 navznyf, 16 bs juvpu jrer fanxrf. Vs gung qbrfa'g qrfpevor Nhfgenyvn V qba'g xabj jung qbrf.]
            – jafe
            Oct 1 at 11:06














          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted










          Well, I'd say Grandpa was in




          Australia




          And he saw




          16, 8 and 2 animals of three types. Why?


          assume the least number was 1. That makes the largest number 8 and the middle 4. That's 13, so we should double each number for 16, 8, 2.




          Of which




          the 16 can't have two legs (more than 26) and no one legged animals, so they have 0 legs (snakes?)

          The 8 can't have 3 legs, because the 2 would have to be one legged, so the 8 have 2 legs/limbs. This could be a wingless bird like a Kiwi. (ok, it has wings but they are so small they are invisible and Grandpa wouldn't have seen them)

          The 2 have 5 limbs, therefore. Which a Kangaroo is considered to have, counting it's tail (hence Australia)







          share|improve this answer


















          • 1




            Also, rot13[Ur fnj 26 navznyf, 16 bs juvpu jrer fanxrf. Vs gung qbrfa'g qrfpevor Nhfgenyvn V qba'g xabj jung qbrf.]
            – jafe
            Oct 1 at 11:06












          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted






          Well, I'd say Grandpa was in




          Australia




          And he saw




          16, 8 and 2 animals of three types. Why?


          assume the least number was 1. That makes the largest number 8 and the middle 4. That's 13, so we should double each number for 16, 8, 2.




          Of which




          the 16 can't have two legs (more than 26) and no one legged animals, so they have 0 legs (snakes?)

          The 8 can't have 3 legs, because the 2 would have to be one legged, so the 8 have 2 legs/limbs. This could be a wingless bird like a Kiwi. (ok, it has wings but they are so small they are invisible and Grandpa wouldn't have seen them)

          The 2 have 5 limbs, therefore. Which a Kangaroo is considered to have, counting it's tail (hence Australia)







          share|improve this answer














          Well, I'd say Grandpa was in




          Australia




          And he saw




          16, 8 and 2 animals of three types. Why?


          assume the least number was 1. That makes the largest number 8 and the middle 4. That's 13, so we should double each number for 16, 8, 2.




          Of which




          the 16 can't have two legs (more than 26) and no one legged animals, so they have 0 legs (snakes?)

          The 8 can't have 3 legs, because the 2 would have to be one legged, so the 8 have 2 legs/limbs. This could be a wingless bird like a Kiwi. (ok, it has wings but they are so small they are invisible and Grandpa wouldn't have seen them)

          The 2 have 5 limbs, therefore. Which a Kangaroo is considered to have, counting it's tail (hence Australia)








          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Oct 1 at 0:31

























          answered Oct 1 at 0:07









          SteveV

          2,834216




          2,834216







          • 1




            Also, rot13[Ur fnj 26 navznyf, 16 bs juvpu jrer fanxrf. Vs gung qbrfa'g qrfpevor Nhfgenyvn V qba'g xabj jung qbrf.]
            – jafe
            Oct 1 at 11:06












          • 1




            Also, rot13[Ur fnj 26 navznyf, 16 bs juvpu jrer fanxrf. Vs gung qbrfa'g qrfpevor Nhfgenyvn V qba'g xabj jung qbrf.]
            – jafe
            Oct 1 at 11:06







          1




          1




          Also, rot13[Ur fnj 26 navznyf, 16 bs juvpu jrer fanxrf. Vs gung qbrfa'g qrfpevor Nhfgenyvn V qba'g xabj jung qbrf.]
          – jafe
          Oct 1 at 11:06




          Also, rot13[Ur fnj 26 navznyf, 16 bs juvpu jrer fanxrf. Vs gung qbrfa'g qrfpevor Nhfgenyvn V qba'g xabj jung qbrf.]
          – jafe
          Oct 1 at 11:06










          up vote
          6
          down vote













          Ok, so he said he counted 26 animals



          We have that




          • number of type 1 = n
          • number of type 2 = n/8
          • number of type 3 = n/2

          n + n/8 + n/2 = 26, therefore n = 16




          so he saw:




          • 16 of type 1
          • 2 of type 2
          • 8 of type 3




          But what were they?




          He saw 16 type 1's, and saw no one legged animals; if type 1 had 2 legs, the minimum allowable, he'd have seen 32 limbs; too many already. So, type 1 has no legs, must be a snake or fish.




          from that we have




          (2*x)+(8*y) = 26. Logical numbers are 2 and 4; lets plug them in: 2*4 + 8*2 = 24 thats too low; but if we add 2 legs to either we blow it out...




          but he originally said




          limbs, so thats not necessarily in pairs... 2*5 + 8*2 is just right




          Thus, he saw




          16 snakes, fish or other zero-limbed creatures
          2 five-limbed creatures. I'm going with starfish, but spider-monkeys with prehensile tails could be another contender
          8 two-limbed creatures, this could be anything; flamingoes, chickens etc.







          share|improve this answer






















          • thanks el-guest; man i'm struggling with spoilerised paragraphs; what a pain!
            – crcroberts
            Oct 1 at 0:18










          • Great Logic @crcroberts. But "Where was I?" was the question he asked.
            – DEEM
            Oct 1 at 11:46














          up vote
          6
          down vote













          Ok, so he said he counted 26 animals



          We have that




          • number of type 1 = n
          • number of type 2 = n/8
          • number of type 3 = n/2

          n + n/8 + n/2 = 26, therefore n = 16




          so he saw:




          • 16 of type 1
          • 2 of type 2
          • 8 of type 3




          But what were they?




          He saw 16 type 1's, and saw no one legged animals; if type 1 had 2 legs, the minimum allowable, he'd have seen 32 limbs; too many already. So, type 1 has no legs, must be a snake or fish.




          from that we have




          (2*x)+(8*y) = 26. Logical numbers are 2 and 4; lets plug them in: 2*4 + 8*2 = 24 thats too low; but if we add 2 legs to either we blow it out...




          but he originally said




          limbs, so thats not necessarily in pairs... 2*5 + 8*2 is just right




          Thus, he saw




          16 snakes, fish or other zero-limbed creatures
          2 five-limbed creatures. I'm going with starfish, but spider-monkeys with prehensile tails could be another contender
          8 two-limbed creatures, this could be anything; flamingoes, chickens etc.







          share|improve this answer






















          • thanks el-guest; man i'm struggling with spoilerised paragraphs; what a pain!
            – crcroberts
            Oct 1 at 0:18










          • Great Logic @crcroberts. But "Where was I?" was the question he asked.
            – DEEM
            Oct 1 at 11:46












          up vote
          6
          down vote










          up vote
          6
          down vote









          Ok, so he said he counted 26 animals



          We have that




          • number of type 1 = n
          • number of type 2 = n/8
          • number of type 3 = n/2

          n + n/8 + n/2 = 26, therefore n = 16




          so he saw:




          • 16 of type 1
          • 2 of type 2
          • 8 of type 3




          But what were they?




          He saw 16 type 1's, and saw no one legged animals; if type 1 had 2 legs, the minimum allowable, he'd have seen 32 limbs; too many already. So, type 1 has no legs, must be a snake or fish.




          from that we have




          (2*x)+(8*y) = 26. Logical numbers are 2 and 4; lets plug them in: 2*4 + 8*2 = 24 thats too low; but if we add 2 legs to either we blow it out...




          but he originally said




          limbs, so thats not necessarily in pairs... 2*5 + 8*2 is just right




          Thus, he saw




          16 snakes, fish or other zero-limbed creatures
          2 five-limbed creatures. I'm going with starfish, but spider-monkeys with prehensile tails could be another contender
          8 two-limbed creatures, this could be anything; flamingoes, chickens etc.







          share|improve this answer














          Ok, so he said he counted 26 animals



          We have that




          • number of type 1 = n
          • number of type 2 = n/8
          • number of type 3 = n/2

          n + n/8 + n/2 = 26, therefore n = 16




          so he saw:




          • 16 of type 1
          • 2 of type 2
          • 8 of type 3




          But what were they?




          He saw 16 type 1's, and saw no one legged animals; if type 1 had 2 legs, the minimum allowable, he'd have seen 32 limbs; too many already. So, type 1 has no legs, must be a snake or fish.




          from that we have




          (2*x)+(8*y) = 26. Logical numbers are 2 and 4; lets plug them in: 2*4 + 8*2 = 24 thats too low; but if we add 2 legs to either we blow it out...




          but he originally said




          limbs, so thats not necessarily in pairs... 2*5 + 8*2 is just right




          Thus, he saw




          16 snakes, fish or other zero-limbed creatures
          2 five-limbed creatures. I'm going with starfish, but spider-monkeys with prehensile tails could be another contender
          8 two-limbed creatures, this could be anything; flamingoes, chickens etc.








          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Oct 1 at 0:20

























          answered Oct 1 at 0:13









          crcroberts

          1,243916




          1,243916











          • thanks el-guest; man i'm struggling with spoilerised paragraphs; what a pain!
            – crcroberts
            Oct 1 at 0:18










          • Great Logic @crcroberts. But "Where was I?" was the question he asked.
            – DEEM
            Oct 1 at 11:46
















          • thanks el-guest; man i'm struggling with spoilerised paragraphs; what a pain!
            – crcroberts
            Oct 1 at 0:18










          • Great Logic @crcroberts. But "Where was I?" was the question he asked.
            – DEEM
            Oct 1 at 11:46















          thanks el-guest; man i'm struggling with spoilerised paragraphs; what a pain!
          – crcroberts
          Oct 1 at 0:18




          thanks el-guest; man i'm struggling with spoilerised paragraphs; what a pain!
          – crcroberts
          Oct 1 at 0:18












          Great Logic @crcroberts. But "Where was I?" was the question he asked.
          – DEEM
          Oct 1 at 11:46




          Great Logic @crcroberts. But "Where was I?" was the question he asked.
          – DEEM
          Oct 1 at 11:46

















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f73263%2fdid-grandpa-count-correctly-another-grandpa-mystery%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Popular posts from this blog

          How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

          Bahrain

          Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay