How did Ashoka Vana remain unaffected by the fire?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
9
down vote

favorite
1












When Hanuman set the entire Lanka on fire, how is it that Ashoka Vana escaped it. Was it because Hanuman put out the fire, or due to Sita's power or the fire did not reach there?










share|improve this question



























    up vote
    9
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    When Hanuman set the entire Lanka on fire, how is it that Ashoka Vana escaped it. Was it because Hanuman put out the fire, or due to Sita's power or the fire did not reach there?










    share|improve this question

























      up vote
      9
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      9
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      When Hanuman set the entire Lanka on fire, how is it that Ashoka Vana escaped it. Was it because Hanuman put out the fire, or due to Sita's power or the fire did not reach there?










      share|improve this question















      When Hanuman set the entire Lanka on fire, how is it that Ashoka Vana escaped it. Was it because Hanuman put out the fire, or due to Sita's power or the fire did not reach there?







      mythology ramayana hanuman sita






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Sep 13 at 17:39









      sv.

      12.2k63495




      12.2k63495










      asked Sep 13 at 3:27









      Nishant Mohan

      1598




      1598




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          11
          down vote













          When Sita heard that Hanuman's tail was being ignited by the demons, she prayed to to the fire-god and fire didn't harm Hanuman in any way even he felt if a snow-ball is kept at the tip of his tail. Then, leaving the house of Vibhishana, Hanuman put fire on other houses. Also there is no mention that Hanuman put fire on Ashoka Vatika.



          But, after seeing the city of Lanka blazing, Hanuman thought that Sita too might have lost her life. While thinking this, Hanuman sees some good omens and asserts himself that Sita can survive from the fire by her virtues of penance and devotion to Rama:




          अथवा चारु सर्व अन्गी रक्षिता स्वेन तेजसा |



          न नशिष्यति कल्याणी न अग्निः अग्नौ प्रवर्तते || ५-५५-२२



          Or else, Seetha the auspicious lady, who is completely charming of her limbs and protected by her own effulgence, does not get destroyed. Fire does not indeed destroy fire!



          न हि धर्मात्मनस्तस्य भार्याममिततेजसः।



          स्वचारित्राभिगुप्तां तां स्प्रष्टुमर्हति पावकः।।5.55.23।।



          Fire cannot touch that lady who is protected by her own chastity and who is wedded to the righteous man of immasureable glory.



          नूनं रामप्रभावेण वैदेह्यास्सुकृतेन च।



          यन्मां दहनकर्मायं नादहद्धव्यवाहनः।।5.55.24।।



          Fire, the consumer of oblations who has the property of burning has not burnt me and this is surely on account of Rama's power and Vaidehi's merits.




          And, Hanuma again visits Ashoka garden and sees Seetha there.



          Ashoka Vana (Vatika) and house of Vibhishana remained unaffected because



          • Hanuman didn't put out the fire explicitly there


          • Both Fire-god and Wind-god were acting as per Sita's prayer (as mentioned in 4.53.32-33)


          • Sita's merits/powers


          • Rama's powers


          • Vibhishana's merits



          Sorces:



          Valmiki Ramayan: Sundara Kanda: Sarga 53 - Sarga 56






          share|improve this answer


















          • 1




            Only only Sita, But Vibhishan's house was also unaffected. Because Hanumana took care of both Mata Sita and Vibhishan.
            – Rishabh
            Sep 13 at 17:52

















          up vote
          6
          down vote













          Hanuman made sure that Asoka Van remained unaffected by fire after he realized that Sita could get hurt.



          Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna / Volume 1 / In The Company Of Devotees:




          So one should be careful about anger, passion, and greed. Take, for instance, the case of Hanuman. In a fit of anger he burnt Ceylon. At last he remembered that Sita was living in the Ashoka grove. Then, he began to tremble lest the fire should injure her.







          share|improve this answer


















          • 6




            Is that the right text to answer this question from?
            – Rickross
            Sep 13 at 9:41


















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          11
          down vote













          When Sita heard that Hanuman's tail was being ignited by the demons, she prayed to to the fire-god and fire didn't harm Hanuman in any way even he felt if a snow-ball is kept at the tip of his tail. Then, leaving the house of Vibhishana, Hanuman put fire on other houses. Also there is no mention that Hanuman put fire on Ashoka Vatika.



          But, after seeing the city of Lanka blazing, Hanuman thought that Sita too might have lost her life. While thinking this, Hanuman sees some good omens and asserts himself that Sita can survive from the fire by her virtues of penance and devotion to Rama:




          अथवा चारु सर्व अन्गी रक्षिता स्वेन तेजसा |



          न नशिष्यति कल्याणी न अग्निः अग्नौ प्रवर्तते || ५-५५-२२



          Or else, Seetha the auspicious lady, who is completely charming of her limbs and protected by her own effulgence, does not get destroyed. Fire does not indeed destroy fire!



          न हि धर्मात्मनस्तस्य भार्याममिततेजसः।



          स्वचारित्राभिगुप्तां तां स्प्रष्टुमर्हति पावकः।।5.55.23।।



          Fire cannot touch that lady who is protected by her own chastity and who is wedded to the righteous man of immasureable glory.



          नूनं रामप्रभावेण वैदेह्यास्सुकृतेन च।



          यन्मां दहनकर्मायं नादहद्धव्यवाहनः।।5.55.24।।



          Fire, the consumer of oblations who has the property of burning has not burnt me and this is surely on account of Rama's power and Vaidehi's merits.




          And, Hanuma again visits Ashoka garden and sees Seetha there.



          Ashoka Vana (Vatika) and house of Vibhishana remained unaffected because



          • Hanuman didn't put out the fire explicitly there


          • Both Fire-god and Wind-god were acting as per Sita's prayer (as mentioned in 4.53.32-33)


          • Sita's merits/powers


          • Rama's powers


          • Vibhishana's merits



          Sorces:



          Valmiki Ramayan: Sundara Kanda: Sarga 53 - Sarga 56






          share|improve this answer


















          • 1




            Only only Sita, But Vibhishan's house was also unaffected. Because Hanumana took care of both Mata Sita and Vibhishan.
            – Rishabh
            Sep 13 at 17:52














          up vote
          11
          down vote













          When Sita heard that Hanuman's tail was being ignited by the demons, she prayed to to the fire-god and fire didn't harm Hanuman in any way even he felt if a snow-ball is kept at the tip of his tail. Then, leaving the house of Vibhishana, Hanuman put fire on other houses. Also there is no mention that Hanuman put fire on Ashoka Vatika.



          But, after seeing the city of Lanka blazing, Hanuman thought that Sita too might have lost her life. While thinking this, Hanuman sees some good omens and asserts himself that Sita can survive from the fire by her virtues of penance and devotion to Rama:




          अथवा चारु सर्व अन्गी रक्षिता स्वेन तेजसा |



          न नशिष्यति कल्याणी न अग्निः अग्नौ प्रवर्तते || ५-५५-२२



          Or else, Seetha the auspicious lady, who is completely charming of her limbs and protected by her own effulgence, does not get destroyed. Fire does not indeed destroy fire!



          न हि धर्मात्मनस्तस्य भार्याममिततेजसः।



          स्वचारित्राभिगुप्तां तां स्प्रष्टुमर्हति पावकः।।5.55.23।।



          Fire cannot touch that lady who is protected by her own chastity and who is wedded to the righteous man of immasureable glory.



          नूनं रामप्रभावेण वैदेह्यास्सुकृतेन च।



          यन्मां दहनकर्मायं नादहद्धव्यवाहनः।।5.55.24।।



          Fire, the consumer of oblations who has the property of burning has not burnt me and this is surely on account of Rama's power and Vaidehi's merits.




          And, Hanuma again visits Ashoka garden and sees Seetha there.



          Ashoka Vana (Vatika) and house of Vibhishana remained unaffected because



          • Hanuman didn't put out the fire explicitly there


          • Both Fire-god and Wind-god were acting as per Sita's prayer (as mentioned in 4.53.32-33)


          • Sita's merits/powers


          • Rama's powers


          • Vibhishana's merits



          Sorces:



          Valmiki Ramayan: Sundara Kanda: Sarga 53 - Sarga 56






          share|improve this answer


















          • 1




            Only only Sita, But Vibhishan's house was also unaffected. Because Hanumana took care of both Mata Sita and Vibhishan.
            – Rishabh
            Sep 13 at 17:52












          up vote
          11
          down vote










          up vote
          11
          down vote









          When Sita heard that Hanuman's tail was being ignited by the demons, she prayed to to the fire-god and fire didn't harm Hanuman in any way even he felt if a snow-ball is kept at the tip of his tail. Then, leaving the house of Vibhishana, Hanuman put fire on other houses. Also there is no mention that Hanuman put fire on Ashoka Vatika.



          But, after seeing the city of Lanka blazing, Hanuman thought that Sita too might have lost her life. While thinking this, Hanuman sees some good omens and asserts himself that Sita can survive from the fire by her virtues of penance and devotion to Rama:




          अथवा चारु सर्व अन्गी रक्षिता स्वेन तेजसा |



          न नशिष्यति कल्याणी न अग्निः अग्नौ प्रवर्तते || ५-५५-२२



          Or else, Seetha the auspicious lady, who is completely charming of her limbs and protected by her own effulgence, does not get destroyed. Fire does not indeed destroy fire!



          न हि धर्मात्मनस्तस्य भार्याममिततेजसः।



          स्वचारित्राभिगुप्तां तां स्प्रष्टुमर्हति पावकः।।5.55.23।।



          Fire cannot touch that lady who is protected by her own chastity and who is wedded to the righteous man of immasureable glory.



          नूनं रामप्रभावेण वैदेह्यास्सुकृतेन च।



          यन्मां दहनकर्मायं नादहद्धव्यवाहनः।।5.55.24।।



          Fire, the consumer of oblations who has the property of burning has not burnt me and this is surely on account of Rama's power and Vaidehi's merits.




          And, Hanuma again visits Ashoka garden and sees Seetha there.



          Ashoka Vana (Vatika) and house of Vibhishana remained unaffected because



          • Hanuman didn't put out the fire explicitly there


          • Both Fire-god and Wind-god were acting as per Sita's prayer (as mentioned in 4.53.32-33)


          • Sita's merits/powers


          • Rama's powers


          • Vibhishana's merits



          Sorces:



          Valmiki Ramayan: Sundara Kanda: Sarga 53 - Sarga 56






          share|improve this answer














          When Sita heard that Hanuman's tail was being ignited by the demons, she prayed to to the fire-god and fire didn't harm Hanuman in any way even he felt if a snow-ball is kept at the tip of his tail. Then, leaving the house of Vibhishana, Hanuman put fire on other houses. Also there is no mention that Hanuman put fire on Ashoka Vatika.



          But, after seeing the city of Lanka blazing, Hanuman thought that Sita too might have lost her life. While thinking this, Hanuman sees some good omens and asserts himself that Sita can survive from the fire by her virtues of penance and devotion to Rama:




          अथवा चारु सर्व अन्गी रक्षिता स्वेन तेजसा |



          न नशिष्यति कल्याणी न अग्निः अग्नौ प्रवर्तते || ५-५५-२२



          Or else, Seetha the auspicious lady, who is completely charming of her limbs and protected by her own effulgence, does not get destroyed. Fire does not indeed destroy fire!



          न हि धर्मात्मनस्तस्य भार्याममिततेजसः।



          स्वचारित्राभिगुप्तां तां स्प्रष्टुमर्हति पावकः।।5.55.23।।



          Fire cannot touch that lady who is protected by her own chastity and who is wedded to the righteous man of immasureable glory.



          नूनं रामप्रभावेण वैदेह्यास्सुकृतेन च।



          यन्मां दहनकर्मायं नादहद्धव्यवाहनः।।5.55.24।।



          Fire, the consumer of oblations who has the property of burning has not burnt me and this is surely on account of Rama's power and Vaidehi's merits.




          And, Hanuma again visits Ashoka garden and sees Seetha there.



          Ashoka Vana (Vatika) and house of Vibhishana remained unaffected because



          • Hanuman didn't put out the fire explicitly there


          • Both Fire-god and Wind-god were acting as per Sita's prayer (as mentioned in 4.53.32-33)


          • Sita's merits/powers


          • Rama's powers


          • Vibhishana's merits



          Sorces:



          Valmiki Ramayan: Sundara Kanda: Sarga 53 - Sarga 56







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Sep 13 at 18:25

























          answered Sep 13 at 6:22









          YDS

          8,3251848




          8,3251848







          • 1




            Only only Sita, But Vibhishan's house was also unaffected. Because Hanumana took care of both Mata Sita and Vibhishan.
            – Rishabh
            Sep 13 at 17:52












          • 1




            Only only Sita, But Vibhishan's house was also unaffected. Because Hanumana took care of both Mata Sita and Vibhishan.
            – Rishabh
            Sep 13 at 17:52







          1




          1




          Only only Sita, But Vibhishan's house was also unaffected. Because Hanumana took care of both Mata Sita and Vibhishan.
          – Rishabh
          Sep 13 at 17:52




          Only only Sita, But Vibhishan's house was also unaffected. Because Hanumana took care of both Mata Sita and Vibhishan.
          – Rishabh
          Sep 13 at 17:52










          up vote
          6
          down vote













          Hanuman made sure that Asoka Van remained unaffected by fire after he realized that Sita could get hurt.



          Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna / Volume 1 / In The Company Of Devotees:




          So one should be careful about anger, passion, and greed. Take, for instance, the case of Hanuman. In a fit of anger he burnt Ceylon. At last he remembered that Sita was living in the Ashoka grove. Then, he began to tremble lest the fire should injure her.







          share|improve this answer


















          • 6




            Is that the right text to answer this question from?
            – Rickross
            Sep 13 at 9:41














          up vote
          6
          down vote













          Hanuman made sure that Asoka Van remained unaffected by fire after he realized that Sita could get hurt.



          Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna / Volume 1 / In The Company Of Devotees:




          So one should be careful about anger, passion, and greed. Take, for instance, the case of Hanuman. In a fit of anger he burnt Ceylon. At last he remembered that Sita was living in the Ashoka grove. Then, he began to tremble lest the fire should injure her.







          share|improve this answer


















          • 6




            Is that the right text to answer this question from?
            – Rickross
            Sep 13 at 9:41












          up vote
          6
          down vote










          up vote
          6
          down vote









          Hanuman made sure that Asoka Van remained unaffected by fire after he realized that Sita could get hurt.



          Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna / Volume 1 / In The Company Of Devotees:




          So one should be careful about anger, passion, and greed. Take, for instance, the case of Hanuman. In a fit of anger he burnt Ceylon. At last he remembered that Sita was living in the Ashoka grove. Then, he began to tremble lest the fire should injure her.







          share|improve this answer














          Hanuman made sure that Asoka Van remained unaffected by fire after he realized that Sita could get hurt.



          Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna / Volume 1 / In The Company Of Devotees:




          So one should be careful about anger, passion, and greed. Take, for instance, the case of Hanuman. In a fit of anger he burnt Ceylon. At last he remembered that Sita was living in the Ashoka grove. Then, he began to tremble lest the fire should injure her.








          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Sep 13 at 18:00









          sv.

          12.2k63495




          12.2k63495










          answered Sep 13 at 9:33









          Chinmay Sarupria

          2,68121239




          2,68121239







          • 6




            Is that the right text to answer this question from?
            – Rickross
            Sep 13 at 9:41












          • 6




            Is that the right text to answer this question from?
            – Rickross
            Sep 13 at 9:41







          6




          6




          Is that the right text to answer this question from?
          – Rickross
          Sep 13 at 9:41




          Is that the right text to answer this question from?
          – Rickross
          Sep 13 at 9:41


          Popular posts from this blog

          How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

          Bahrain

          Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay