Readonly flag after error: why does Kernel detect an error?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I'm debugging a C++ application running on Linux Embedded:
uname -r: 4.14.40
The application is downloading a file on an external flash SD card:
mount: sd-path type vfat (rw,relatime,fmask=0022,dmask=0022,codepage=437,iocharset=iso8859-1,shortname=mixed,errors=remount-ro)
If a file doesn't exist, the file handler is opened with a w (full overwrite) flag, otherwise it is opened with r+ flag (append mode) so that the download may continue from the last downloaded sector.
What I'm observing is that if I power off the machine after starting to download the file, on reboot the SD is still available for write operation, while if I power off the machine a second time (while the file is being accessed in r+ mode) the SD is mounted again in readonly mode.
I suspect this happens because the Kernel detects an error and the SD is mounted in readonly mode, as specified by the mount options pasted above.
What I don't understand is why the r+ mode triggers the kernel error, which error is triggered (even a way to understand it would suffice) and if so how can I avoid the error. Is r+ inherently unsafe? Should I use other / additional flags for flash-specific IO operations?
Thank you for your time.
mount io c++ readonly flash-memory
asked Mar 14 at 13:08
phagiophagio
12
add a comment |
I'm debugging a C++ application running on Linux Embedded:
uname -r: 4.14.40
The application is downloading a file on an external flash SD card:
mount: sd-path type vfat (rw,relatime,fmask=0022,dmask=0022,codepage=437,iocharset=iso8859-1,shortname=mixed,errors=remount-ro)
If a file doesn't exist, the file handler is opened with a w (full overwrite) flag, otherwise it is opened with r+ flag (append mode) so that the download may continue from the last downloaded sector.
What I'm observing is that if I power off the machine after starting to download the file, on reboot the SD is still available for write operation, while if I power off the machine a second time (while the file is being accessed in r+ mode) the SD is mounted again in readonly mode.
I suspect this happens because the Kernel detects an error and the SD is mounted in readonly mode, as specified by the mount options pasted above.
What I don't understand is why the r+ mode triggers the kernel error, which error is triggered (even a way to understand it would suffice) and if so how can I avoid the error. Is r+ inherently unsafe? Should I use other / additional flags for flash-specific IO operations?
Thank you for your time.
mount io c++ readonly flash-memory
asked Mar 14 at 13:08
phagiophagio
12
add a comment |
I'm debugging a C++ application running on Linux Embedded:
uname -r: 4.14.40
The application is downloading a file on an external flash SD card:
mount: sd-path type vfat (rw,relatime,fmask=0022,dmask=0022,codepage=437,iocharset=iso8859-1,shortname=mixed,errors=remount-ro)
If a file doesn't exist, the file handler is opened with a w (full overwrite) flag, otherwise it is opened with r+ flag (append mode) so that the download may continue from the last downloaded sector.
What I'm observing is that if I power off the machine after starting to download the file, on reboot the SD is still available for write operation, while if I power off the machine a second time (while the file is being accessed in r+ mode) the SD is mounted again in readonly mode.
I suspect this happens because the Kernel detects an error and the SD is mounted in readonly mode, as specified by the mount options pasted above.
What I don't understand is why the r+ mode triggers the kernel error, which error is triggered (even a way to understand it would suffice) and if so how can I avoid the error. Is r+ inherently unsafe? Should I use other / additional flags for flash-specific IO operations?
Thank you for your time.
mount io c++ readonly flash-memory
asked Mar 14 at 13:08
phagiophagio
12
I'm debugging a C++ application running on Linux Embedded:
uname -r: 4.14.40
The application is downloading a file on an external flash SD card:
mount: sd-path type vfat (rw,relatime,fmask=0022,dmask=0022,codepage=437,iocharset=iso8859-1,shortname=mixed,errors=remount-ro)
If a file doesn't exist, the file handler is opened with a w (full overwrite) flag, otherwise it is opened with r+ flag (append mode) so that the download may continue from the last downloaded sector.
What I'm observing is that if I power off the machine after starting to download the file, on reboot the SD is still available for write operation, while if I power off the machine a second time (while the file is being accessed in r+ mode) the SD is mounted again in readonly mode.
I suspect this happens because the Kernel detects an error and the SD is mounted in readonly mode, as specified by the mount options pasted above.
What I don't understand is why the r+ mode triggers the kernel error, which error is triggered (even a way to understand it would suffice) and if so how can I avoid the error. Is r+ inherently unsafe? Should I use other / additional flags for flash-specific IO operations?
Thank you for your time.
mount io c++ readonly flash-memory
mount io c++ readonly flash-memory
asked Mar 14 at 13:08
phagiophagio
12
asked Mar 14 at 13:08
phagiophagio
12
asked Mar 14 at 13:08
phagiophagio
12
asked Mar 14 at 13:08
phagiophagio
12
asked Mar 14 at 13:08
phagiophagio
12
12
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f506278%2freadonly-flag-after-error-why-does-kernel-detect-an-error%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f506278%2freadonly-flag-after-error-why-does-kernel-detect-an-error%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
