Re-installing Fedora 20: are automatic partitions safe to use?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I intend to re-install Fedora 20 on a new computer as I am having a lot of trouble with the installation done by the vendor of the computer. It is a dual boot machine with a small Windows XP3 partition for things I cannot do in Linux (mainly proprietary software for electronic devices)
It may be my fault fumbling things that has caused the problems, but anyway I want to re-install it from the official DVD. My question is: can I just accept the automatic partitioning, will it preserve the existing partitions, and will the dual boot Grub still work?
I have no data stored on the new machine: all that was backed up on separate hard drives from the old one, and I have done no permanent work on the new one.
partition system-installation
edited Mar 9 at 14:05
Rui F Ribeiro
41.9k1483142
asked Feb 28 '14 at 11:37
Harry WestonHarry Weston
68411429
add a comment |
I intend to re-install Fedora 20 on a new computer as I am having a lot of trouble with the installation done by the vendor of the computer. It is a dual boot machine with a small Windows XP3 partition for things I cannot do in Linux (mainly proprietary software for electronic devices)
It may be my fault fumbling things that has caused the problems, but anyway I want to re-install it from the official DVD. My question is: can I just accept the automatic partitioning, will it preserve the existing partitions, and will the dual boot Grub still work?
I have no data stored on the new machine: all that was backed up on separate hard drives from the old one, and I have done no permanent work on the new one.
partition system-installation
edited Mar 9 at 14:05
Rui F Ribeiro
41.9k1483142
asked Feb 28 '14 at 11:37
Harry WestonHarry Weston
68411429
add a comment |
I intend to re-install Fedora 20 on a new computer as I am having a lot of trouble with the installation done by the vendor of the computer. It is a dual boot machine with a small Windows XP3 partition for things I cannot do in Linux (mainly proprietary software for electronic devices)
It may be my fault fumbling things that has caused the problems, but anyway I want to re-install it from the official DVD. My question is: can I just accept the automatic partitioning, will it preserve the existing partitions, and will the dual boot Grub still work?
I have no data stored on the new machine: all that was backed up on separate hard drives from the old one, and I have done no permanent work on the new one.
partition system-installation
edited Mar 9 at 14:05
Rui F Ribeiro
41.9k1483142
asked Feb 28 '14 at 11:37
Harry WestonHarry Weston
68411429
I intend to re-install Fedora 20 on a new computer as I am having a lot of trouble with the installation done by the vendor of the computer. It is a dual boot machine with a small Windows XP3 partition for things I cannot do in Linux (mainly proprietary software for electronic devices)
It may be my fault fumbling things that has caused the problems, but anyway I want to re-install it from the official DVD. My question is: can I just accept the automatic partitioning, will it preserve the existing partitions, and will the dual boot Grub still work?
I have no data stored on the new machine: all that was backed up on separate hard drives from the old one, and I have done no permanent work on the new one.
partition system-installation
partition system-installation
edited Mar 9 at 14:05
Rui F Ribeiro
41.9k1483142
asked Feb 28 '14 at 11:37
Harry WestonHarry Weston
68411429
edited Mar 9 at 14:05
Rui F Ribeiro
41.9k1483142
asked Feb 28 '14 at 11:37
Harry WestonHarry Weston
68411429
edited Mar 9 at 14:05
Rui F Ribeiro
41.9k1483142
edited Mar 9 at 14:05
Rui F Ribeiro
41.9k1483142
edited Mar 9 at 14:05
Rui F Ribeiro
41.9k1483142
41.9k1483142
asked Feb 28 '14 at 11:37
Harry WestonHarry Weston
68411429
asked Feb 28 '14 at 11:37
Harry WestonHarry Weston
68411429
asked Feb 28 '14 at 11:37
Harry WestonHarry Weston
68411429
68411429
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
After a lot of frustration I decide to try a well-established version of Fedora instead of the newly released 20 installed by my computer supplier. I have now installed version 17, and, so far, all the problems seem to have been solved. I can now use yum with no trouble. I also was apparently missing a lot of the software, like gnuplot and ghostscript. I suspect that the installer of Fedora 20 had not included the software developer's repositories.
In this installation process I had the option to replace the existing Linux, and that took care of the partitioning doubts.
So, now my question is answered, and I have, fingers crossed, upgraded from Fedora 12 to a decent working Fedora again.
answered Mar 1 '14 at 13:51
Harry WestonHarry Weston
68411429
the "issue with yum" that you're referring to may have been caused by Fedora's decision to replaceyumwith the next-generation package management systemdnf. You can read more aboutdnfand fedora20 by searching online; feel free to read this article as well on the project's "blog site?".
– ILMostro_7
Mar 1 '14 at 15:06
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f117444%2fre-installing-fedora-20-are-automatic-partitions-safe-to-use%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
After a lot of frustration I decide to try a well-established version of Fedora instead of the newly released 20 installed by my computer supplier. I have now installed version 17, and, so far, all the problems seem to have been solved. I can now use yum with no trouble. I also was apparently missing a lot of the software, like gnuplot and ghostscript. I suspect that the installer of Fedora 20 had not included the software developer's repositories.
In this installation process I had the option to replace the existing Linux, and that took care of the partitioning doubts.
So, now my question is answered, and I have, fingers crossed, upgraded from Fedora 12 to a decent working Fedora again.
answered Mar 1 '14 at 13:51
Harry WestonHarry Weston
68411429
the "issue with yum" that you're referring to may have been caused by Fedora's decision to replaceyumwith the next-generation package management systemdnf. You can read more aboutdnfand fedora20 by searching online; feel free to read this article as well on the project's "blog site?".
– ILMostro_7
Mar 1 '14 at 15:06
add a comment |
After a lot of frustration I decide to try a well-established version of Fedora instead of the newly released 20 installed by my computer supplier. I have now installed version 17, and, so far, all the problems seem to have been solved. I can now use yum with no trouble. I also was apparently missing a lot of the software, like gnuplot and ghostscript. I suspect that the installer of Fedora 20 had not included the software developer's repositories.
In this installation process I had the option to replace the existing Linux, and that took care of the partitioning doubts.
So, now my question is answered, and I have, fingers crossed, upgraded from Fedora 12 to a decent working Fedora again.
answered Mar 1 '14 at 13:51
Harry WestonHarry Weston
68411429
the "issue with yum" that you're referring to may have been caused by Fedora's decision to replaceyumwith the next-generation package management systemdnf. You can read more aboutdnfand fedora20 by searching online; feel free to read this article as well on the project's "blog site?".
– ILMostro_7
Mar 1 '14 at 15:06
add a comment |
After a lot of frustration I decide to try a well-established version of Fedora instead of the newly released 20 installed by my computer supplier. I have now installed version 17, and, so far, all the problems seem to have been solved. I can now use yum with no trouble. I also was apparently missing a lot of the software, like gnuplot and ghostscript. I suspect that the installer of Fedora 20 had not included the software developer's repositories.
In this installation process I had the option to replace the existing Linux, and that took care of the partitioning doubts.
So, now my question is answered, and I have, fingers crossed, upgraded from Fedora 12 to a decent working Fedora again.
answered Mar 1 '14 at 13:51
Harry WestonHarry Weston
68411429
After a lot of frustration I decide to try a well-established version of Fedora instead of the newly released 20 installed by my computer supplier. I have now installed version 17, and, so far, all the problems seem to have been solved. I can now use yum with no trouble. I also was apparently missing a lot of the software, like gnuplot and ghostscript. I suspect that the installer of Fedora 20 had not included the software developer's repositories.
In this installation process I had the option to replace the existing Linux, and that took care of the partitioning doubts.
So, now my question is answered, and I have, fingers crossed, upgraded from Fedora 12 to a decent working Fedora again.
answered Mar 1 '14 at 13:51
Harry WestonHarry Weston
68411429
edited Mar 2 '14 at 17:16
answered Mar 1 '14 at 13:51
Harry WestonHarry Weston
68411429
answered Mar 1 '14 at 13:51
Harry WestonHarry Weston
68411429
answered Mar 1 '14 at 13:51
Harry WestonHarry Weston
68411429
68411429
the "issue with yum" that you're referring to may have been caused by Fedora's decision to replaceyumwith the next-generation package management systemdnf. You can read more aboutdnfand fedora20 by searching online; feel free to read this article as well on the project's "blog site?".
– ILMostro_7
Mar 1 '14 at 15:06
add a comment |
the "issue with yum" that you're referring to may have been caused by Fedora's decision to replaceyumwith the next-generation package management systemdnf. You can read more aboutdnfand fedora20 by searching online; feel free to read this article as well on the project's "blog site?".
– ILMostro_7
Mar 1 '14 at 15:06
the "issue with yum" that you're referring to may have been caused by Fedora's decision to replace
yum with the next-generation package management system dnf. You can read more about dnf and fedora20 by searching online; feel free to read this article as well on the project's "blog site?".– ILMostro_7
Mar 1 '14 at 15:06
the "issue with yum" that you're referring to may have been caused by Fedora's decision to replace
yum with the next-generation package management system dnf. You can read more about dnf and fedora20 by searching online; feel free to read this article as well on the project's "blog site?".– ILMostro_7
Mar 1 '14 at 15:06
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f117444%2fre-installing-fedora-20-are-automatic-partitions-safe-to-use%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
