How should I interpret “between Neville and Ron” in the context of this Harry Potter passage?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
They (Hermione and Ron) did not stop arguing all the way down to Snape's dungeon, which gave Harry plenty of time to reflect that between Neville and Ron he would be lucky ever to have two minutes of conversation with Cho that he could look back on without wanting to leave the country.
Harry Potter
I don't understand "between Neville and Ron" in this context. Can someone help to explain it in the context?
meaning-in-context
edited Feb 1 at 13:46
V2Blast
14518
asked Jan 31 at 8:02
dandan
5,23722675
add a comment |
They (Hermione and Ron) did not stop arguing all the way down to Snape's dungeon, which gave Harry plenty of time to reflect that between Neville and Ron he would be lucky ever to have two minutes of conversation with Cho that he could look back on without wanting to leave the country.
Harry Potter
I don't understand "between Neville and Ron" in this context. Can someone help to explain it in the context?
meaning-in-context
edited Feb 1 at 13:46
V2Blast
14518
asked Jan 31 at 8:02
dandan
5,23722675
ell.stackexchange.com/questions/194802/…
– Alex
Jan 31 at 20:17
add a comment |
They (Hermione and Ron) did not stop arguing all the way down to Snape's dungeon, which gave Harry plenty of time to reflect that between Neville and Ron he would be lucky ever to have two minutes of conversation with Cho that he could look back on without wanting to leave the country.
Harry Potter
I don't understand "between Neville and Ron" in this context. Can someone help to explain it in the context?
meaning-in-context
edited Feb 1 at 13:46
V2Blast
14518
asked Jan 31 at 8:02
dandan
5,23722675
They (Hermione and Ron) did not stop arguing all the way down to Snape's dungeon, which gave Harry plenty of time to reflect that between Neville and Ron he would be lucky ever to have two minutes of conversation with Cho that he could look back on without wanting to leave the country.
Harry Potter
I don't understand "between Neville and Ron" in this context. Can someone help to explain it in the context?
meaning-in-context
meaning-in-context
edited Feb 1 at 13:46
V2Blast
14518
asked Jan 31 at 8:02
dandan
5,23722675
edited Feb 1 at 13:46
V2Blast
14518
asked Jan 31 at 8:02
dandan
5,23722675
edited Feb 1 at 13:46
V2Blast
14518
edited Feb 1 at 13:46
V2Blast
14518
edited Feb 1 at 13:46
V2Blast
14518
14518
asked Jan 31 at 8:02
dandan
5,23722675
asked Jan 31 at 8:02
dandan
5,23722675
asked Jan 31 at 8:02
dandan
5,23722675
5,23722675
ell.stackexchange.com/questions/194802/…
– Alex
Jan 31 at 20:17
add a comment |
ell.stackexchange.com/questions/194802/…
– Alex
Jan 31 at 20:17
ell.stackexchange.com/questions/194802/…
– Alex
Jan 31 at 20:17
ell.stackexchange.com/questions/194802/…
– Alex
Jan 31 at 20:17
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Compare:
Between school and my job, I don't have much time for anything else.
The phrase means "given the combined (encroachments or demands of) school and my job" there is no time left over for other activities.
So, in your example, it would be "given the combined (encroachments or demands of) Neville and Ron" a good two-minute conversation with Cho was unlikely. The nature of those encroachments or demands is supplied by context. For example, it could be that the two of them, whether individually or as a duo, were monopolizing Cho's time, or monopolizing Harry's time, or that they were goofing off with each other so that there were constant hijinks and never a quiet moment where Harry could talk with Cho. Whatever. You'd have to look to the wider context in the book to get a sense of how Ron and Neville were interfering in this.
answered Jan 31 at 10:22
TᴚoɯɐuoTᴚoɯɐuo
113k788182
add a comment |
According to the Oxford Dictionary
between [preposition]
By combining the resources or actions of (two or more people or other entities)
I didn't remember what's happening exactly at that point of the book but it may mean that if you add [combine] the time that Harry spends with Neville plus the time that Harry spends with Ron [two people] then he would be lucky ever to have two minutes of conversation with Cho.
I want to remark that the relevant part in relation with your question is combine whatever they both are doing. What they are doing exactly is not present in your excerpt.
Probably in the context of the book the whole sentence is not about Neville and Ron wasting Harry's time but they are combining their actions somehow to prevent Harry for having a conversation with Cho.
answered Jan 31 at 8:20
RubioRicRubioRic
4,84811034
Hmmm, that doesn't sound very convincing.
– dan
Jan 31 at 8:41
1
@Dan As I said, I don't remember exactly what's happening but something that Neville and Ron [between them] are doing prevents Harry for having a conversation with Cho.
– RubioRic
Jan 31 at 8:59
2
@dan Yes, it could be, the relevant part is that "between them" means that the "combined efforts of Neville and Ron" are spoiling Harry's chances with Cho. That's what I was trying to express.
– RubioRic
Jan 31 at 10:07
2
@dan: I think efforts is the misleading aspect of an otherwise good explanation.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 31 at 10:24
4
@Tᴚoɯɐuo Well, I updated my post replacing "efforts" by "actions" before your comment. I hope this made it less misleading. :-)
– RubioRic
Jan 31 at 10:29
|
show 3 more comments
In the context of the book, if memory serves, Cho came upon Harry while he was sitting with Neville on the Hogwarts Express just after Neville's Mimbulus mimbletonia exploded, covering Harry in stinksap, which he found embarrassing. Later, Ron angrily challenges Cho on her support of a Quidditch team and picks a fight with her, also embarrassing Harry.
In your quote, Harry is saying that because of Neville and Ron combined, it seems that every time he tries to talk to Cho, he is embarrassed. It is not necessarily implying that Neville and Ron are working together to embarrass him (or that they are even doing it intentionally) but that their combined actions are making it impossible for him to have a positive conversation with Cho.
answered Jan 31 at 18:11
thumbtackthiefthumbtackthief
26318
1
The other answers are technically correct in their definitions of the phrase, but not in their application to the story. In the context of the story this is the correct answer.
– Alex
Jan 31 at 20:14
1
@Alex It's not often I get to let my Harry Potter geekdom and my love of grammar intersect.
– thumbtackthief
Jan 31 at 21:02
1
Check out dan's profile then. There are several hundred questions, most of which are based on Harry Potter.
– Alex
Jan 31 at 21:08
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194802%2fhow-should-i-interpret-between-neville-and-ron-in-the-context-of-this-harry-po%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Compare:
Between school and my job, I don't have much time for anything else.
The phrase means "given the combined (encroachments or demands of) school and my job" there is no time left over for other activities.
So, in your example, it would be "given the combined (encroachments or demands of) Neville and Ron" a good two-minute conversation with Cho was unlikely. The nature of those encroachments or demands is supplied by context. For example, it could be that the two of them, whether individually or as a duo, were monopolizing Cho's time, or monopolizing Harry's time, or that they were goofing off with each other so that there were constant hijinks and never a quiet moment where Harry could talk with Cho. Whatever. You'd have to look to the wider context in the book to get a sense of how Ron and Neville were interfering in this.
answered Jan 31 at 10:22
TᴚoɯɐuoTᴚoɯɐuo
113k788182
add a comment |
Compare:
Between school and my job, I don't have much time for anything else.
The phrase means "given the combined (encroachments or demands of) school and my job" there is no time left over for other activities.
So, in your example, it would be "given the combined (encroachments or demands of) Neville and Ron" a good two-minute conversation with Cho was unlikely. The nature of those encroachments or demands is supplied by context. For example, it could be that the two of them, whether individually or as a duo, were monopolizing Cho's time, or monopolizing Harry's time, or that they were goofing off with each other so that there were constant hijinks and never a quiet moment where Harry could talk with Cho. Whatever. You'd have to look to the wider context in the book to get a sense of how Ron and Neville were interfering in this.
answered Jan 31 at 10:22
TᴚoɯɐuoTᴚoɯɐuo
113k788182
add a comment |
Compare:
Between school and my job, I don't have much time for anything else.
The phrase means "given the combined (encroachments or demands of) school and my job" there is no time left over for other activities.
So, in your example, it would be "given the combined (encroachments or demands of) Neville and Ron" a good two-minute conversation with Cho was unlikely. The nature of those encroachments or demands is supplied by context. For example, it could be that the two of them, whether individually or as a duo, were monopolizing Cho's time, or monopolizing Harry's time, or that they were goofing off with each other so that there were constant hijinks and never a quiet moment where Harry could talk with Cho. Whatever. You'd have to look to the wider context in the book to get a sense of how Ron and Neville were interfering in this.
answered Jan 31 at 10:22
TᴚoɯɐuoTᴚoɯɐuo
113k788182
Compare:
Between school and my job, I don't have much time for anything else.
The phrase means "given the combined (encroachments or demands of) school and my job" there is no time left over for other activities.
So, in your example, it would be "given the combined (encroachments or demands of) Neville and Ron" a good two-minute conversation with Cho was unlikely. The nature of those encroachments or demands is supplied by context. For example, it could be that the two of them, whether individually or as a duo, were monopolizing Cho's time, or monopolizing Harry's time, or that they were goofing off with each other so that there were constant hijinks and never a quiet moment where Harry could talk with Cho. Whatever. You'd have to look to the wider context in the book to get a sense of how Ron and Neville were interfering in this.
answered Jan 31 at 10:22
TᴚoɯɐuoTᴚoɯɐuo
113k788182
edited Jan 31 at 12:18
answered Jan 31 at 10:22
TᴚoɯɐuoTᴚoɯɐuo
113k788182
answered Jan 31 at 10:22
TᴚoɯɐuoTᴚoɯɐuo
113k788182
answered Jan 31 at 10:22
TᴚoɯɐuoTᴚoɯɐuo
113k788182
113k788182
add a comment |
add a comment |
According to the Oxford Dictionary
between [preposition]
By combining the resources or actions of (two or more people or other entities)
I didn't remember what's happening exactly at that point of the book but it may mean that if you add [combine] the time that Harry spends with Neville plus the time that Harry spends with Ron [two people] then he would be lucky ever to have two minutes of conversation with Cho.
I want to remark that the relevant part in relation with your question is combine whatever they both are doing. What they are doing exactly is not present in your excerpt.
Probably in the context of the book the whole sentence is not about Neville and Ron wasting Harry's time but they are combining their actions somehow to prevent Harry for having a conversation with Cho.
answered Jan 31 at 8:20
RubioRicRubioRic
4,84811034
Hmmm, that doesn't sound very convincing.
– dan
Jan 31 at 8:41
1
@Dan As I said, I don't remember exactly what's happening but something that Neville and Ron [between them] are doing prevents Harry for having a conversation with Cho.
– RubioRic
Jan 31 at 8:59
2
@dan Yes, it could be, the relevant part is that "between them" means that the "combined efforts of Neville and Ron" are spoiling Harry's chances with Cho. That's what I was trying to express.
– RubioRic
Jan 31 at 10:07
2
@dan: I think efforts is the misleading aspect of an otherwise good explanation.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 31 at 10:24
4
@Tᴚoɯɐuo Well, I updated my post replacing "efforts" by "actions" before your comment. I hope this made it less misleading. :-)
– RubioRic
Jan 31 at 10:29
|
show 3 more comments
According to the Oxford Dictionary
between [preposition]
By combining the resources or actions of (two or more people or other entities)
I didn't remember what's happening exactly at that point of the book but it may mean that if you add [combine] the time that Harry spends with Neville plus the time that Harry spends with Ron [two people] then he would be lucky ever to have two minutes of conversation with Cho.
I want to remark that the relevant part in relation with your question is combine whatever they both are doing. What they are doing exactly is not present in your excerpt.
Probably in the context of the book the whole sentence is not about Neville and Ron wasting Harry's time but they are combining their actions somehow to prevent Harry for having a conversation with Cho.
answered Jan 31 at 8:20
RubioRicRubioRic
4,84811034
Hmmm, that doesn't sound very convincing.
– dan
Jan 31 at 8:41
1
@Dan As I said, I don't remember exactly what's happening but something that Neville and Ron [between them] are doing prevents Harry for having a conversation with Cho.
– RubioRic
Jan 31 at 8:59
2
@dan Yes, it could be, the relevant part is that "between them" means that the "combined efforts of Neville and Ron" are spoiling Harry's chances with Cho. That's what I was trying to express.
– RubioRic
Jan 31 at 10:07
2
@dan: I think efforts is the misleading aspect of an otherwise good explanation.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 31 at 10:24
4
@Tᴚoɯɐuo Well, I updated my post replacing "efforts" by "actions" before your comment. I hope this made it less misleading. :-)
– RubioRic
Jan 31 at 10:29
|
show 3 more comments
According to the Oxford Dictionary
between [preposition]
By combining the resources or actions of (two or more people or other entities)
I didn't remember what's happening exactly at that point of the book but it may mean that if you add [combine] the time that Harry spends with Neville plus the time that Harry spends with Ron [two people] then he would be lucky ever to have two minutes of conversation with Cho.
I want to remark that the relevant part in relation with your question is combine whatever they both are doing. What they are doing exactly is not present in your excerpt.
Probably in the context of the book the whole sentence is not about Neville and Ron wasting Harry's time but they are combining their actions somehow to prevent Harry for having a conversation with Cho.
answered Jan 31 at 8:20
RubioRicRubioRic
4,84811034
According to the Oxford Dictionary
between [preposition]
By combining the resources or actions of (two or more people or other entities)
I didn't remember what's happening exactly at that point of the book but it may mean that if you add [combine] the time that Harry spends with Neville plus the time that Harry spends with Ron [two people] then he would be lucky ever to have two minutes of conversation with Cho.
I want to remark that the relevant part in relation with your question is combine whatever they both are doing. What they are doing exactly is not present in your excerpt.
Probably in the context of the book the whole sentence is not about Neville and Ron wasting Harry's time but they are combining their actions somehow to prevent Harry for having a conversation with Cho.
answered Jan 31 at 8:20
RubioRicRubioRic
4,84811034
edited Jan 31 at 15:46
answered Jan 31 at 8:20
RubioRicRubioRic
4,84811034
answered Jan 31 at 8:20
RubioRicRubioRic
4,84811034
answered Jan 31 at 8:20
RubioRicRubioRic
4,84811034
4,84811034
Hmmm, that doesn't sound very convincing.
– dan
Jan 31 at 8:41
1
@Dan As I said, I don't remember exactly what's happening but something that Neville and Ron [between them] are doing prevents Harry for having a conversation with Cho.
– RubioRic
Jan 31 at 8:59
2
@dan Yes, it could be, the relevant part is that "between them" means that the "combined efforts of Neville and Ron" are spoiling Harry's chances with Cho. That's what I was trying to express.
– RubioRic
Jan 31 at 10:07
2
@dan: I think efforts is the misleading aspect of an otherwise good explanation.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 31 at 10:24
4
@Tᴚoɯɐuo Well, I updated my post replacing "efforts" by "actions" before your comment. I hope this made it less misleading. :-)
– RubioRic
Jan 31 at 10:29
|
show 3 more comments
Hmmm, that doesn't sound very convincing.
– dan
Jan 31 at 8:41
1
@Dan As I said, I don't remember exactly what's happening but something that Neville and Ron [between them] are doing prevents Harry for having a conversation with Cho.
– RubioRic
Jan 31 at 8:59
2
@dan Yes, it could be, the relevant part is that "between them" means that the "combined efforts of Neville and Ron" are spoiling Harry's chances with Cho. That's what I was trying to express.
– RubioRic
Jan 31 at 10:07
2
@dan: I think efforts is the misleading aspect of an otherwise good explanation.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 31 at 10:24
4
@Tᴚoɯɐuo Well, I updated my post replacing "efforts" by "actions" before your comment. I hope this made it less misleading. :-)
– RubioRic
Jan 31 at 10:29
Hmmm, that doesn't sound very convincing.
– dan
Jan 31 at 8:41
Hmmm, that doesn't sound very convincing.
– dan
Jan 31 at 8:41
1
1
@Dan As I said, I don't remember exactly what's happening but something that Neville and Ron [between them] are doing prevents Harry for having a conversation with Cho.
– RubioRic
Jan 31 at 8:59
@Dan As I said, I don't remember exactly what's happening but something that Neville and Ron [between them] are doing prevents Harry for having a conversation with Cho.
– RubioRic
Jan 31 at 8:59
2
2
@dan Yes, it could be, the relevant part is that "between them" means that the "combined efforts of Neville and Ron" are spoiling Harry's chances with Cho. That's what I was trying to express.
– RubioRic
Jan 31 at 10:07
@dan Yes, it could be, the relevant part is that "between them" means that the "combined efforts of Neville and Ron" are spoiling Harry's chances with Cho. That's what I was trying to express.
– RubioRic
Jan 31 at 10:07
2
2
@dan: I think efforts is the misleading aspect of an otherwise good explanation.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 31 at 10:24
@dan: I think efforts is the misleading aspect of an otherwise good explanation.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 31 at 10:24
4
4
@Tᴚoɯɐuo Well, I updated my post replacing "efforts" by "actions" before your comment. I hope this made it less misleading. :-)
– RubioRic
Jan 31 at 10:29
@Tᴚoɯɐuo Well, I updated my post replacing "efforts" by "actions" before your comment. I hope this made it less misleading. :-)
– RubioRic
Jan 31 at 10:29
|
show 3 more comments
In the context of the book, if memory serves, Cho came upon Harry while he was sitting with Neville on the Hogwarts Express just after Neville's Mimbulus mimbletonia exploded, covering Harry in stinksap, which he found embarrassing. Later, Ron angrily challenges Cho on her support of a Quidditch team and picks a fight with her, also embarrassing Harry.
In your quote, Harry is saying that because of Neville and Ron combined, it seems that every time he tries to talk to Cho, he is embarrassed. It is not necessarily implying that Neville and Ron are working together to embarrass him (or that they are even doing it intentionally) but that their combined actions are making it impossible for him to have a positive conversation with Cho.
answered Jan 31 at 18:11
thumbtackthiefthumbtackthief
26318
1
The other answers are technically correct in their definitions of the phrase, but not in their application to the story. In the context of the story this is the correct answer.
– Alex
Jan 31 at 20:14
1
@Alex It's not often I get to let my Harry Potter geekdom and my love of grammar intersect.
– thumbtackthief
Jan 31 at 21:02
1
Check out dan's profile then. There are several hundred questions, most of which are based on Harry Potter.
– Alex
Jan 31 at 21:08
add a comment |
In the context of the book, if memory serves, Cho came upon Harry while he was sitting with Neville on the Hogwarts Express just after Neville's Mimbulus mimbletonia exploded, covering Harry in stinksap, which he found embarrassing. Later, Ron angrily challenges Cho on her support of a Quidditch team and picks a fight with her, also embarrassing Harry.
In your quote, Harry is saying that because of Neville and Ron combined, it seems that every time he tries to talk to Cho, he is embarrassed. It is not necessarily implying that Neville and Ron are working together to embarrass him (or that they are even doing it intentionally) but that their combined actions are making it impossible for him to have a positive conversation with Cho.
answered Jan 31 at 18:11
thumbtackthiefthumbtackthief
26318
1
The other answers are technically correct in their definitions of the phrase, but not in their application to the story. In the context of the story this is the correct answer.
– Alex
Jan 31 at 20:14
1
@Alex It's not often I get to let my Harry Potter geekdom and my love of grammar intersect.
– thumbtackthief
Jan 31 at 21:02
1
Check out dan's profile then. There are several hundred questions, most of which are based on Harry Potter.
– Alex
Jan 31 at 21:08
add a comment |
In the context of the book, if memory serves, Cho came upon Harry while he was sitting with Neville on the Hogwarts Express just after Neville's Mimbulus mimbletonia exploded, covering Harry in stinksap, which he found embarrassing. Later, Ron angrily challenges Cho on her support of a Quidditch team and picks a fight with her, also embarrassing Harry.
In your quote, Harry is saying that because of Neville and Ron combined, it seems that every time he tries to talk to Cho, he is embarrassed. It is not necessarily implying that Neville and Ron are working together to embarrass him (or that they are even doing it intentionally) but that their combined actions are making it impossible for him to have a positive conversation with Cho.
answered Jan 31 at 18:11
thumbtackthiefthumbtackthief
26318
In the context of the book, if memory serves, Cho came upon Harry while he was sitting with Neville on the Hogwarts Express just after Neville's Mimbulus mimbletonia exploded, covering Harry in stinksap, which he found embarrassing. Later, Ron angrily challenges Cho on her support of a Quidditch team and picks a fight with her, also embarrassing Harry.
In your quote, Harry is saying that because of Neville and Ron combined, it seems that every time he tries to talk to Cho, he is embarrassed. It is not necessarily implying that Neville and Ron are working together to embarrass him (or that they are even doing it intentionally) but that their combined actions are making it impossible for him to have a positive conversation with Cho.
answered Jan 31 at 18:11
thumbtackthiefthumbtackthief
26318
answered Jan 31 at 18:11
thumbtackthiefthumbtackthief
26318
answered Jan 31 at 18:11
thumbtackthiefthumbtackthief
26318
answered Jan 31 at 18:11
thumbtackthiefthumbtackthief
26318
26318
1
The other answers are technically correct in their definitions of the phrase, but not in their application to the story. In the context of the story this is the correct answer.
– Alex
Jan 31 at 20:14
1
@Alex It's not often I get to let my Harry Potter geekdom and my love of grammar intersect.
– thumbtackthief
Jan 31 at 21:02
1
Check out dan's profile then. There are several hundred questions, most of which are based on Harry Potter.
– Alex
Jan 31 at 21:08
add a comment |
1
The other answers are technically correct in their definitions of the phrase, but not in their application to the story. In the context of the story this is the correct answer.
– Alex
Jan 31 at 20:14
1
@Alex It's not often I get to let my Harry Potter geekdom and my love of grammar intersect.
– thumbtackthief
Jan 31 at 21:02
1
Check out dan's profile then. There are several hundred questions, most of which are based on Harry Potter.
– Alex
Jan 31 at 21:08
1
1
The other answers are technically correct in their definitions of the phrase, but not in their application to the story. In the context of the story this is the correct answer.
– Alex
Jan 31 at 20:14
The other answers are technically correct in their definitions of the phrase, but not in their application to the story. In the context of the story this is the correct answer.
– Alex
Jan 31 at 20:14
1
1
@Alex It's not often I get to let my Harry Potter geekdom and my love of grammar intersect.
– thumbtackthief
Jan 31 at 21:02
@Alex It's not often I get to let my Harry Potter geekdom and my love of grammar intersect.
– thumbtackthief
Jan 31 at 21:02
1
1
Check out dan's profile then. There are several hundred questions, most of which are based on Harry Potter.
– Alex
Jan 31 at 21:08
Check out dan's profile then. There are several hundred questions, most of which are based on Harry Potter.
– Alex
Jan 31 at 21:08
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194802%2fhow-should-i-interpret-between-neville-and-ron-in-the-context-of-this-harry-po%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
ell.stackexchange.com/questions/194802/…
– Alex
Jan 31 at 20:17