Behavior of directly vs indirectly backgrounded children on read

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












1















When I do



( sleep 1; read x ; echo x=$x; echo done ) & 


then with the default terminal settings, the job gets stopped by SIGTTIN.



If I do



( ( sleep 1; read x ; echo x=$x; echo done ) & )


the read syscall inside read gets EOF (returns with 0)` and no stopping by SITTIN happens.



What is the explanation for these behavior










share|improve this question


























    1















    When I do



    ( sleep 1; read x ; echo x=$x; echo done ) & 


    then with the default terminal settings, the job gets stopped by SIGTTIN.



    If I do



    ( ( sleep 1; read x ; echo x=$x; echo done ) & )


    the read syscall inside read gets EOF (returns with 0)` and no stopping by SITTIN happens.



    What is the explanation for these behavior










    share|improve this question
























      1












      1








      1








      When I do



      ( sleep 1; read x ; echo x=$x; echo done ) & 


      then with the default terminal settings, the job gets stopped by SIGTTIN.



      If I do



      ( ( sleep 1; read x ; echo x=$x; echo done ) & )


      the read syscall inside read gets EOF (returns with 0)` and no stopping by SITTIN happens.



      What is the explanation for these behavior










      share|improve this question














      When I do



      ( sleep 1; read x ; echo x=$x; echo done ) & 


      then with the default terminal settings, the job gets stopped by SIGTTIN.



      If I do



      ( ( sleep 1; read x ; echo x=$x; echo done ) & )


      the read syscall inside read gets EOF (returns with 0)` and no stopping by SITTIN happens.



      What is the explanation for these behavior







      shell terminal signals job-control






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Jan 30 at 20:23









      PSkocikPSkocik

      18k54996




      18k54996




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          That's because in the second case the backgrounded command will be run in a subshell, and as there's no job control in subshells, the background mode will be faked by redirecting the input from /dev/null and ignoring the SIGINT and SIGQUIT signals.



          See also these answers:



          Background process of subshell strange behaviour



          Process started by script does not receive SIGINT



          Does ` (sleep 123 &)` remove the process group from bash's job control?



          Process killed before being launched in background






          share|improve this answer
























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "106"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f497778%2fbehavior-of-directly-vs-indirectly-backgrounded-children-on-read%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2














            That's because in the second case the backgrounded command will be run in a subshell, and as there's no job control in subshells, the background mode will be faked by redirecting the input from /dev/null and ignoring the SIGINT and SIGQUIT signals.



            See also these answers:



            Background process of subshell strange behaviour



            Process started by script does not receive SIGINT



            Does ` (sleep 123 &)` remove the process group from bash's job control?



            Process killed before being launched in background






            share|improve this answer





























              2














              That's because in the second case the backgrounded command will be run in a subshell, and as there's no job control in subshells, the background mode will be faked by redirecting the input from /dev/null and ignoring the SIGINT and SIGQUIT signals.



              See also these answers:



              Background process of subshell strange behaviour



              Process started by script does not receive SIGINT



              Does ` (sleep 123 &)` remove the process group from bash's job control?



              Process killed before being launched in background






              share|improve this answer



























                2












                2








                2







                That's because in the second case the backgrounded command will be run in a subshell, and as there's no job control in subshells, the background mode will be faked by redirecting the input from /dev/null and ignoring the SIGINT and SIGQUIT signals.



                See also these answers:



                Background process of subshell strange behaviour



                Process started by script does not receive SIGINT



                Does ` (sleep 123 &)` remove the process group from bash's job control?



                Process killed before being launched in background






                share|improve this answer















                That's because in the second case the backgrounded command will be run in a subshell, and as there's no job control in subshells, the background mode will be faked by redirecting the input from /dev/null and ignoring the SIGINT and SIGQUIT signals.



                See also these answers:



                Background process of subshell strange behaviour



                Process started by script does not receive SIGINT



                Does ` (sleep 123 &)` remove the process group from bash's job control?



                Process killed before being launched in background







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Jan 31 at 23:32

























                answered Jan 30 at 20:57









                mosvymosvy

                7,6421530




                7,6421530



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f497778%2fbehavior-of-directly-vs-indirectly-backgrounded-children-on-read%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown






                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                    Bahrain

                    Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay