Listen to specific event types via process netlink connector
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
I'm authoring a user app that would listen to process events via the process netlink connector.
While listening on the socket, my process spends a lot of time doing busy work because of lots of PROC_EVENT_COMM events being fired by the kernel.
I saw the source code for forkstat but that seems to be having the same problem. Is it not possible to only filter the events that we need on the receiving end of the socket - and save the busy work being done by the user process?
socket unix-sockets
asked Jan 10 at 9:58
divyanshmdivyanshm
768
add a comment |
I'm authoring a user app that would listen to process events via the process netlink connector.
While listening on the socket, my process spends a lot of time doing busy work because of lots of PROC_EVENT_COMM events being fired by the kernel.
I saw the source code for forkstat but that seems to be having the same problem. Is it not possible to only filter the events that we need on the receiving end of the socket - and save the busy work being done by the user process?
socket unix-sockets
asked Jan 10 at 9:58
divyanshmdivyanshm
768
add a comment |
I'm authoring a user app that would listen to process events via the process netlink connector.
While listening on the socket, my process spends a lot of time doing busy work because of lots of PROC_EVENT_COMM events being fired by the kernel.
I saw the source code for forkstat but that seems to be having the same problem. Is it not possible to only filter the events that we need on the receiving end of the socket - and save the busy work being done by the user process?
socket unix-sockets
asked Jan 10 at 9:58
divyanshmdivyanshm
768
I'm authoring a user app that would listen to process events via the process netlink connector.
While listening on the socket, my process spends a lot of time doing busy work because of lots of PROC_EVENT_COMM events being fired by the kernel.
I saw the source code for forkstat but that seems to be having the same problem. Is it not possible to only filter the events that we need on the receiving end of the socket - and save the busy work being done by the user process?
socket unix-sockets
socket unix-sockets
asked Jan 10 at 9:58
divyanshmdivyanshm
768
asked Jan 10 at 9:58
divyanshmdivyanshm
768
asked Jan 10 at 9:58
divyanshmdivyanshm
768
asked Jan 10 at 9:58
divyanshmdivyanshm
768
asked Jan 10 at 9:58
divyanshmdivyanshm
768
768
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f493650%2flisten-to-specific-event-types-via-process-netlink-connector%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f493650%2flisten-to-specific-event-types-via-process-netlink-connector%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
