Can we find out server/daemon and client processes from each other on the same machine?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












On Ubuntu, I often run some server/daemon and some clients both locally. The server/daemon and clients can be arbitrary programs (emacs daemon and clients, Screen daemon and clients, server and clients someone wrote), and suppose you don't how they are named.



  • Is there some way to find the PID of the server/daemon, given only the PID of a client process?


  • Is there some way to find the PIDs of all the clients, given only the PID of the server/daemon?


If what I am asking is impossible, what extra minimum information do you need to achieve the goals for as general purpose as possible?



Thanks.










share|improve this question



















  • 1




    If the applications are using sockets to communicate, you could see which sockets each PIDs are connected to and which PIDs are listening on the other end. netstat and lsof are your friends here.
    – multithr3at3d
    Dec 1 at 1:54










  • Thanks. Can you give some example commands to achieve both goals? What are other ways to implement server clients besides using sockets to communicate?
    – Tim
    Dec 1 at 1:55











  • @Tim this could be of interest -- but beware that both lsof and ss are pretty difficult, to use a mild word.
    – mosvy
    Dec 1 at 3:42










  • @mosvy Thanks. "difficult" in what sense?
    – Tim
    Dec 4 at 0:22










  • In the sense that I find their user interface pretty hugged up. If you're able to use either of them without having to look up each time the options in the the manual and/or write a script to make sense of the output -- great for you ;-)
    – mosvy
    Dec 4 at 1:56














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












On Ubuntu, I often run some server/daemon and some clients both locally. The server/daemon and clients can be arbitrary programs (emacs daemon and clients, Screen daemon and clients, server and clients someone wrote), and suppose you don't how they are named.



  • Is there some way to find the PID of the server/daemon, given only the PID of a client process?


  • Is there some way to find the PIDs of all the clients, given only the PID of the server/daemon?


If what I am asking is impossible, what extra minimum information do you need to achieve the goals for as general purpose as possible?



Thanks.










share|improve this question



















  • 1




    If the applications are using sockets to communicate, you could see which sockets each PIDs are connected to and which PIDs are listening on the other end. netstat and lsof are your friends here.
    – multithr3at3d
    Dec 1 at 1:54










  • Thanks. Can you give some example commands to achieve both goals? What are other ways to implement server clients besides using sockets to communicate?
    – Tim
    Dec 1 at 1:55











  • @Tim this could be of interest -- but beware that both lsof and ss are pretty difficult, to use a mild word.
    – mosvy
    Dec 1 at 3:42










  • @mosvy Thanks. "difficult" in what sense?
    – Tim
    Dec 4 at 0:22










  • In the sense that I find their user interface pretty hugged up. If you're able to use either of them without having to look up each time the options in the the manual and/or write a script to make sense of the output -- great for you ;-)
    – mosvy
    Dec 4 at 1:56












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











On Ubuntu, I often run some server/daemon and some clients both locally. The server/daemon and clients can be arbitrary programs (emacs daemon and clients, Screen daemon and clients, server and clients someone wrote), and suppose you don't how they are named.



  • Is there some way to find the PID of the server/daemon, given only the PID of a client process?


  • Is there some way to find the PIDs of all the clients, given only the PID of the server/daemon?


If what I am asking is impossible, what extra minimum information do you need to achieve the goals for as general purpose as possible?



Thanks.










share|improve this question















On Ubuntu, I often run some server/daemon and some clients both locally. The server/daemon and clients can be arbitrary programs (emacs daemon and clients, Screen daemon and clients, server and clients someone wrote), and suppose you don't how they are named.



  • Is there some way to find the PID of the server/daemon, given only the PID of a client process?


  • Is there some way to find the PIDs of all the clients, given only the PID of the server/daemon?


If what I am asking is impossible, what extra minimum information do you need to achieve the goals for as general purpose as possible?



Thanks.







linux process daemon






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 1 at 1:51

























asked Dec 1 at 1:46









Tim

25.3k72243446




25.3k72243446







  • 1




    If the applications are using sockets to communicate, you could see which sockets each PIDs are connected to and which PIDs are listening on the other end. netstat and lsof are your friends here.
    – multithr3at3d
    Dec 1 at 1:54










  • Thanks. Can you give some example commands to achieve both goals? What are other ways to implement server clients besides using sockets to communicate?
    – Tim
    Dec 1 at 1:55











  • @Tim this could be of interest -- but beware that both lsof and ss are pretty difficult, to use a mild word.
    – mosvy
    Dec 1 at 3:42










  • @mosvy Thanks. "difficult" in what sense?
    – Tim
    Dec 4 at 0:22










  • In the sense that I find their user interface pretty hugged up. If you're able to use either of them without having to look up each time the options in the the manual and/or write a script to make sense of the output -- great for you ;-)
    – mosvy
    Dec 4 at 1:56












  • 1




    If the applications are using sockets to communicate, you could see which sockets each PIDs are connected to and which PIDs are listening on the other end. netstat and lsof are your friends here.
    – multithr3at3d
    Dec 1 at 1:54










  • Thanks. Can you give some example commands to achieve both goals? What are other ways to implement server clients besides using sockets to communicate?
    – Tim
    Dec 1 at 1:55











  • @Tim this could be of interest -- but beware that both lsof and ss are pretty difficult, to use a mild word.
    – mosvy
    Dec 1 at 3:42










  • @mosvy Thanks. "difficult" in what sense?
    – Tim
    Dec 4 at 0:22










  • In the sense that I find their user interface pretty hugged up. If you're able to use either of them without having to look up each time the options in the the manual and/or write a script to make sense of the output -- great for you ;-)
    – mosvy
    Dec 4 at 1:56







1




1




If the applications are using sockets to communicate, you could see which sockets each PIDs are connected to and which PIDs are listening on the other end. netstat and lsof are your friends here.
– multithr3at3d
Dec 1 at 1:54




If the applications are using sockets to communicate, you could see which sockets each PIDs are connected to and which PIDs are listening on the other end. netstat and lsof are your friends here.
– multithr3at3d
Dec 1 at 1:54












Thanks. Can you give some example commands to achieve both goals? What are other ways to implement server clients besides using sockets to communicate?
– Tim
Dec 1 at 1:55





Thanks. Can you give some example commands to achieve both goals? What are other ways to implement server clients besides using sockets to communicate?
– Tim
Dec 1 at 1:55













@Tim this could be of interest -- but beware that both lsof and ss are pretty difficult, to use a mild word.
– mosvy
Dec 1 at 3:42




@Tim this could be of interest -- but beware that both lsof and ss are pretty difficult, to use a mild word.
– mosvy
Dec 1 at 3:42












@mosvy Thanks. "difficult" in what sense?
– Tim
Dec 4 at 0:22




@mosvy Thanks. "difficult" in what sense?
– Tim
Dec 4 at 0:22












In the sense that I find their user interface pretty hugged up. If you're able to use either of them without having to look up each time the options in the the manual and/or write a script to make sense of the output -- great for you ;-)
– mosvy
Dec 4 at 1:56




In the sense that I find their user interface pretty hugged up. If you're able to use either of them without having to look up each time the options in the the manual and/or write a script to make sense of the output -- great for you ;-)
– mosvy
Dec 4 at 1:56










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













Most forms of IPC (inter-process communication) can be traced with a few utilities. Sockets (both network and UNIX sockets) are very commonly used and can be traced using some common tools. Let's look at an example using netstat -ap:



Active Internet connections (servers and established)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:5000 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 810/python3
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:80 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 858/nginx: master process
<snip>
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:46858 127.0.0.1:5000 ESTABLISHED 860/nginx: worker process
<snip>
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:5000 127.0.0.1:46858 ESTABLISHED 810/python3


The two processes with PIDs 860 and 810 are communicating; 810 being the server in this case. We can see this by visually parsing the netstat output or grep for it.



Also, say we wanted to see what clients are talking with PID 810, we could do lsof -p 810:



COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
<snip>
python3 810 user 8u IPv4 35702 0t0 TCP 127.0.0.1:5000 (LISTEN)
python3 810 user 10u IPv4 4682120 0t0 TCP 127.0.0.1:5000->127.0.0.1:46858 (ESTABLISHED)


Here we can identify the endpoint that is communicating with our process, but not the PID. To identify the other PID, we could do lsof -i :46858:



COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
python3 810 user 10u IPv4 4682120 0t0 TCP localhost:5000->localhost:46858 (ESTABLISHED)
nginx 860 nginx 18u IPv4 4681280 0t0 TCP localhost:46858->localhost:5000 (ESTABLISHED)


Further down in the netstat output is UNIX sockets:



Active UNIX domain sockets (servers and established)
Proto RefCnt Flags Type State I-Node PID/Program name Path
<snip>
unix 2 [ ACC ] STREAM LISTENING 21936 1/systemd /run/dbus/system_bus_socket
<snip>
unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 28918 648/dbus-daemon /run/dbus/system_bus_socket


We can see that both of these processes are using the UNIX socket at /run/dbus/system_bus_socket. So if you knew one of the processes, looking at this, you should be able to determine the other end. lsof can be used again in this case, and can also be pointed at the socket file like lsof /run/dbus/system_bus_socket.



I realize this is a little convoluted and a little complicated, but I hope it helps. Note that other types of IPC that use some kind of file/handle (such as pipes) can be traced using lsof as well.






share|improve this answer






















  • Thanks. (1) "The two processes with PIDs 860 and 810 are communicating; 810 being the server in this case". How do you know which is the server which is client?
    – Tim
    Dec 3 at 22:50










  • @Tim because you can see a separate entry for the server's socket in a listen state.
    – multithr3at3d
    Dec 4 at 1:24










  • netstat will only print the name for a unix socket in the case where the socket is bound to that path/name, not when it's connected to it. For instance, if you start xclock it will connect to the X11 socket deducted from the DISPLAY envvar, but you won't be able to tell from the output of netstat -xp | grep xclock which socket it's connected to.
    – mosvy
    Dec 4 at 2:07











  • @mosvy Does a socket binding to a pathname means the relation between a socket and its socket file? "when it's connected to it", do you mean a socket connects to another socket?
    – Tim
    Dec 4 at 3:07











  • @Tim Any socket may have two addresses it's in "relation" with -- the address to which it's bound (with bind(2), returned by getsockname(2)), and the address to which it's connected (with connect(2), returned by getpeername(2)). In the case of unix sockets a) the addresses are paths in the filesystem (or simple strings on linux which also supports "abstract" sockets) b) a connected socket may be anonymous, with no address it's bound to (the kernel doesn't bind it to an automatic address, as it does with tcp sockets). Most "client" unix sockets are like that.
    – mosvy
    Dec 4 at 3:28











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f485280%2fcan-we-find-out-server-daemon-and-client-processes-from-each-other-on-the-same-m%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote













Most forms of IPC (inter-process communication) can be traced with a few utilities. Sockets (both network and UNIX sockets) are very commonly used and can be traced using some common tools. Let's look at an example using netstat -ap:



Active Internet connections (servers and established)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:5000 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 810/python3
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:80 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 858/nginx: master process
<snip>
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:46858 127.0.0.1:5000 ESTABLISHED 860/nginx: worker process
<snip>
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:5000 127.0.0.1:46858 ESTABLISHED 810/python3


The two processes with PIDs 860 and 810 are communicating; 810 being the server in this case. We can see this by visually parsing the netstat output or grep for it.



Also, say we wanted to see what clients are talking with PID 810, we could do lsof -p 810:



COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
<snip>
python3 810 user 8u IPv4 35702 0t0 TCP 127.0.0.1:5000 (LISTEN)
python3 810 user 10u IPv4 4682120 0t0 TCP 127.0.0.1:5000->127.0.0.1:46858 (ESTABLISHED)


Here we can identify the endpoint that is communicating with our process, but not the PID. To identify the other PID, we could do lsof -i :46858:



COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
python3 810 user 10u IPv4 4682120 0t0 TCP localhost:5000->localhost:46858 (ESTABLISHED)
nginx 860 nginx 18u IPv4 4681280 0t0 TCP localhost:46858->localhost:5000 (ESTABLISHED)


Further down in the netstat output is UNIX sockets:



Active UNIX domain sockets (servers and established)
Proto RefCnt Flags Type State I-Node PID/Program name Path
<snip>
unix 2 [ ACC ] STREAM LISTENING 21936 1/systemd /run/dbus/system_bus_socket
<snip>
unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 28918 648/dbus-daemon /run/dbus/system_bus_socket


We can see that both of these processes are using the UNIX socket at /run/dbus/system_bus_socket. So if you knew one of the processes, looking at this, you should be able to determine the other end. lsof can be used again in this case, and can also be pointed at the socket file like lsof /run/dbus/system_bus_socket.



I realize this is a little convoluted and a little complicated, but I hope it helps. Note that other types of IPC that use some kind of file/handle (such as pipes) can be traced using lsof as well.






share|improve this answer






















  • Thanks. (1) "The two processes with PIDs 860 and 810 are communicating; 810 being the server in this case". How do you know which is the server which is client?
    – Tim
    Dec 3 at 22:50










  • @Tim because you can see a separate entry for the server's socket in a listen state.
    – multithr3at3d
    Dec 4 at 1:24










  • netstat will only print the name for a unix socket in the case where the socket is bound to that path/name, not when it's connected to it. For instance, if you start xclock it will connect to the X11 socket deducted from the DISPLAY envvar, but you won't be able to tell from the output of netstat -xp | grep xclock which socket it's connected to.
    – mosvy
    Dec 4 at 2:07











  • @mosvy Does a socket binding to a pathname means the relation between a socket and its socket file? "when it's connected to it", do you mean a socket connects to another socket?
    – Tim
    Dec 4 at 3:07











  • @Tim Any socket may have two addresses it's in "relation" with -- the address to which it's bound (with bind(2), returned by getsockname(2)), and the address to which it's connected (with connect(2), returned by getpeername(2)). In the case of unix sockets a) the addresses are paths in the filesystem (or simple strings on linux which also supports "abstract" sockets) b) a connected socket may be anonymous, with no address it's bound to (the kernel doesn't bind it to an automatic address, as it does with tcp sockets). Most "client" unix sockets are like that.
    – mosvy
    Dec 4 at 3:28















up vote
2
down vote













Most forms of IPC (inter-process communication) can be traced with a few utilities. Sockets (both network and UNIX sockets) are very commonly used and can be traced using some common tools. Let's look at an example using netstat -ap:



Active Internet connections (servers and established)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:5000 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 810/python3
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:80 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 858/nginx: master process
<snip>
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:46858 127.0.0.1:5000 ESTABLISHED 860/nginx: worker process
<snip>
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:5000 127.0.0.1:46858 ESTABLISHED 810/python3


The two processes with PIDs 860 and 810 are communicating; 810 being the server in this case. We can see this by visually parsing the netstat output or grep for it.



Also, say we wanted to see what clients are talking with PID 810, we could do lsof -p 810:



COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
<snip>
python3 810 user 8u IPv4 35702 0t0 TCP 127.0.0.1:5000 (LISTEN)
python3 810 user 10u IPv4 4682120 0t0 TCP 127.0.0.1:5000->127.0.0.1:46858 (ESTABLISHED)


Here we can identify the endpoint that is communicating with our process, but not the PID. To identify the other PID, we could do lsof -i :46858:



COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
python3 810 user 10u IPv4 4682120 0t0 TCP localhost:5000->localhost:46858 (ESTABLISHED)
nginx 860 nginx 18u IPv4 4681280 0t0 TCP localhost:46858->localhost:5000 (ESTABLISHED)


Further down in the netstat output is UNIX sockets:



Active UNIX domain sockets (servers and established)
Proto RefCnt Flags Type State I-Node PID/Program name Path
<snip>
unix 2 [ ACC ] STREAM LISTENING 21936 1/systemd /run/dbus/system_bus_socket
<snip>
unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 28918 648/dbus-daemon /run/dbus/system_bus_socket


We can see that both of these processes are using the UNIX socket at /run/dbus/system_bus_socket. So if you knew one of the processes, looking at this, you should be able to determine the other end. lsof can be used again in this case, and can also be pointed at the socket file like lsof /run/dbus/system_bus_socket.



I realize this is a little convoluted and a little complicated, but I hope it helps. Note that other types of IPC that use some kind of file/handle (such as pipes) can be traced using lsof as well.






share|improve this answer






















  • Thanks. (1) "The two processes with PIDs 860 and 810 are communicating; 810 being the server in this case". How do you know which is the server which is client?
    – Tim
    Dec 3 at 22:50










  • @Tim because you can see a separate entry for the server's socket in a listen state.
    – multithr3at3d
    Dec 4 at 1:24










  • netstat will only print the name for a unix socket in the case where the socket is bound to that path/name, not when it's connected to it. For instance, if you start xclock it will connect to the X11 socket deducted from the DISPLAY envvar, but you won't be able to tell from the output of netstat -xp | grep xclock which socket it's connected to.
    – mosvy
    Dec 4 at 2:07











  • @mosvy Does a socket binding to a pathname means the relation between a socket and its socket file? "when it's connected to it", do you mean a socket connects to another socket?
    – Tim
    Dec 4 at 3:07











  • @Tim Any socket may have two addresses it's in "relation" with -- the address to which it's bound (with bind(2), returned by getsockname(2)), and the address to which it's connected (with connect(2), returned by getpeername(2)). In the case of unix sockets a) the addresses are paths in the filesystem (or simple strings on linux which also supports "abstract" sockets) b) a connected socket may be anonymous, with no address it's bound to (the kernel doesn't bind it to an automatic address, as it does with tcp sockets). Most "client" unix sockets are like that.
    – mosvy
    Dec 4 at 3:28













up vote
2
down vote










up vote
2
down vote









Most forms of IPC (inter-process communication) can be traced with a few utilities. Sockets (both network and UNIX sockets) are very commonly used and can be traced using some common tools. Let's look at an example using netstat -ap:



Active Internet connections (servers and established)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:5000 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 810/python3
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:80 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 858/nginx: master process
<snip>
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:46858 127.0.0.1:5000 ESTABLISHED 860/nginx: worker process
<snip>
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:5000 127.0.0.1:46858 ESTABLISHED 810/python3


The two processes with PIDs 860 and 810 are communicating; 810 being the server in this case. We can see this by visually parsing the netstat output or grep for it.



Also, say we wanted to see what clients are talking with PID 810, we could do lsof -p 810:



COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
<snip>
python3 810 user 8u IPv4 35702 0t0 TCP 127.0.0.1:5000 (LISTEN)
python3 810 user 10u IPv4 4682120 0t0 TCP 127.0.0.1:5000->127.0.0.1:46858 (ESTABLISHED)


Here we can identify the endpoint that is communicating with our process, but not the PID. To identify the other PID, we could do lsof -i :46858:



COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
python3 810 user 10u IPv4 4682120 0t0 TCP localhost:5000->localhost:46858 (ESTABLISHED)
nginx 860 nginx 18u IPv4 4681280 0t0 TCP localhost:46858->localhost:5000 (ESTABLISHED)


Further down in the netstat output is UNIX sockets:



Active UNIX domain sockets (servers and established)
Proto RefCnt Flags Type State I-Node PID/Program name Path
<snip>
unix 2 [ ACC ] STREAM LISTENING 21936 1/systemd /run/dbus/system_bus_socket
<snip>
unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 28918 648/dbus-daemon /run/dbus/system_bus_socket


We can see that both of these processes are using the UNIX socket at /run/dbus/system_bus_socket. So if you knew one of the processes, looking at this, you should be able to determine the other end. lsof can be used again in this case, and can also be pointed at the socket file like lsof /run/dbus/system_bus_socket.



I realize this is a little convoluted and a little complicated, but I hope it helps. Note that other types of IPC that use some kind of file/handle (such as pipes) can be traced using lsof as well.






share|improve this answer














Most forms of IPC (inter-process communication) can be traced with a few utilities. Sockets (both network and UNIX sockets) are very commonly used and can be traced using some common tools. Let's look at an example using netstat -ap:



Active Internet connections (servers and established)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:5000 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 810/python3
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:80 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 858/nginx: master process
<snip>
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:46858 127.0.0.1:5000 ESTABLISHED 860/nginx: worker process
<snip>
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:5000 127.0.0.1:46858 ESTABLISHED 810/python3


The two processes with PIDs 860 and 810 are communicating; 810 being the server in this case. We can see this by visually parsing the netstat output or grep for it.



Also, say we wanted to see what clients are talking with PID 810, we could do lsof -p 810:



COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
<snip>
python3 810 user 8u IPv4 35702 0t0 TCP 127.0.0.1:5000 (LISTEN)
python3 810 user 10u IPv4 4682120 0t0 TCP 127.0.0.1:5000->127.0.0.1:46858 (ESTABLISHED)


Here we can identify the endpoint that is communicating with our process, but not the PID. To identify the other PID, we could do lsof -i :46858:



COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
python3 810 user 10u IPv4 4682120 0t0 TCP localhost:5000->localhost:46858 (ESTABLISHED)
nginx 860 nginx 18u IPv4 4681280 0t0 TCP localhost:46858->localhost:5000 (ESTABLISHED)


Further down in the netstat output is UNIX sockets:



Active UNIX domain sockets (servers and established)
Proto RefCnt Flags Type State I-Node PID/Program name Path
<snip>
unix 2 [ ACC ] STREAM LISTENING 21936 1/systemd /run/dbus/system_bus_socket
<snip>
unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 28918 648/dbus-daemon /run/dbus/system_bus_socket


We can see that both of these processes are using the UNIX socket at /run/dbus/system_bus_socket. So if you knew one of the processes, looking at this, you should be able to determine the other end. lsof can be used again in this case, and can also be pointed at the socket file like lsof /run/dbus/system_bus_socket.



I realize this is a little convoluted and a little complicated, but I hope it helps. Note that other types of IPC that use some kind of file/handle (such as pipes) can be traced using lsof as well.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Dec 4 at 1:24

























answered Dec 1 at 3:53









multithr3at3d

42028




42028











  • Thanks. (1) "The two processes with PIDs 860 and 810 are communicating; 810 being the server in this case". How do you know which is the server which is client?
    – Tim
    Dec 3 at 22:50










  • @Tim because you can see a separate entry for the server's socket in a listen state.
    – multithr3at3d
    Dec 4 at 1:24










  • netstat will only print the name for a unix socket in the case where the socket is bound to that path/name, not when it's connected to it. For instance, if you start xclock it will connect to the X11 socket deducted from the DISPLAY envvar, but you won't be able to tell from the output of netstat -xp | grep xclock which socket it's connected to.
    – mosvy
    Dec 4 at 2:07











  • @mosvy Does a socket binding to a pathname means the relation between a socket and its socket file? "when it's connected to it", do you mean a socket connects to another socket?
    – Tim
    Dec 4 at 3:07











  • @Tim Any socket may have two addresses it's in "relation" with -- the address to which it's bound (with bind(2), returned by getsockname(2)), and the address to which it's connected (with connect(2), returned by getpeername(2)). In the case of unix sockets a) the addresses are paths in the filesystem (or simple strings on linux which also supports "abstract" sockets) b) a connected socket may be anonymous, with no address it's bound to (the kernel doesn't bind it to an automatic address, as it does with tcp sockets). Most "client" unix sockets are like that.
    – mosvy
    Dec 4 at 3:28

















  • Thanks. (1) "The two processes with PIDs 860 and 810 are communicating; 810 being the server in this case". How do you know which is the server which is client?
    – Tim
    Dec 3 at 22:50










  • @Tim because you can see a separate entry for the server's socket in a listen state.
    – multithr3at3d
    Dec 4 at 1:24










  • netstat will only print the name for a unix socket in the case where the socket is bound to that path/name, not when it's connected to it. For instance, if you start xclock it will connect to the X11 socket deducted from the DISPLAY envvar, but you won't be able to tell from the output of netstat -xp | grep xclock which socket it's connected to.
    – mosvy
    Dec 4 at 2:07











  • @mosvy Does a socket binding to a pathname means the relation between a socket and its socket file? "when it's connected to it", do you mean a socket connects to another socket?
    – Tim
    Dec 4 at 3:07











  • @Tim Any socket may have two addresses it's in "relation" with -- the address to which it's bound (with bind(2), returned by getsockname(2)), and the address to which it's connected (with connect(2), returned by getpeername(2)). In the case of unix sockets a) the addresses are paths in the filesystem (or simple strings on linux which also supports "abstract" sockets) b) a connected socket may be anonymous, with no address it's bound to (the kernel doesn't bind it to an automatic address, as it does with tcp sockets). Most "client" unix sockets are like that.
    – mosvy
    Dec 4 at 3:28
















Thanks. (1) "The two processes with PIDs 860 and 810 are communicating; 810 being the server in this case". How do you know which is the server which is client?
– Tim
Dec 3 at 22:50




Thanks. (1) "The two processes with PIDs 860 and 810 are communicating; 810 being the server in this case". How do you know which is the server which is client?
– Tim
Dec 3 at 22:50












@Tim because you can see a separate entry for the server's socket in a listen state.
– multithr3at3d
Dec 4 at 1:24




@Tim because you can see a separate entry for the server's socket in a listen state.
– multithr3at3d
Dec 4 at 1:24












netstat will only print the name for a unix socket in the case where the socket is bound to that path/name, not when it's connected to it. For instance, if you start xclock it will connect to the X11 socket deducted from the DISPLAY envvar, but you won't be able to tell from the output of netstat -xp | grep xclock which socket it's connected to.
– mosvy
Dec 4 at 2:07





netstat will only print the name for a unix socket in the case where the socket is bound to that path/name, not when it's connected to it. For instance, if you start xclock it will connect to the X11 socket deducted from the DISPLAY envvar, but you won't be able to tell from the output of netstat -xp | grep xclock which socket it's connected to.
– mosvy
Dec 4 at 2:07













@mosvy Does a socket binding to a pathname means the relation between a socket and its socket file? "when it's connected to it", do you mean a socket connects to another socket?
– Tim
Dec 4 at 3:07





@mosvy Does a socket binding to a pathname means the relation between a socket and its socket file? "when it's connected to it", do you mean a socket connects to another socket?
– Tim
Dec 4 at 3:07













@Tim Any socket may have two addresses it's in "relation" with -- the address to which it's bound (with bind(2), returned by getsockname(2)), and the address to which it's connected (with connect(2), returned by getpeername(2)). In the case of unix sockets a) the addresses are paths in the filesystem (or simple strings on linux which also supports "abstract" sockets) b) a connected socket may be anonymous, with no address it's bound to (the kernel doesn't bind it to an automatic address, as it does with tcp sockets). Most "client" unix sockets are like that.
– mosvy
Dec 4 at 3:28





@Tim Any socket may have two addresses it's in "relation" with -- the address to which it's bound (with bind(2), returned by getsockname(2)), and the address to which it's connected (with connect(2), returned by getpeername(2)). In the case of unix sockets a) the addresses are paths in the filesystem (or simple strings on linux which also supports "abstract" sockets) b) a connected socket may be anonymous, with no address it's bound to (the kernel doesn't bind it to an automatic address, as it does with tcp sockets). Most "client" unix sockets are like that.
– mosvy
Dec 4 at 3:28


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f485280%2fcan-we-find-out-server-daemon-and-client-processes-from-each-other-on-the-same-m%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown






Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Bahrain

Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay