linux + already using mac address

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












from the dmseg output we can see the following:



seems that the error about the duplicate mac comes from team0 card



as I know team card is internal card in the HW
so how it can be that we get duplicate MAC?



is it mean that other HW machine that have also team0 card have the same MAC?



we have redhat machine version 7.3



[14114.080815] i40e 0000:81:00.0 p1p1: already using mac address 1c:f3:fe:2a:ac:43
[14114.080826] team0: Port device p1p1 removed
[14114.374799] i40e 0000:81:00.1 p1p2: returning to hw mac address 3c:fd:fe:2a:cc:42 
[14114.380880] team0: Port device p1p2 removed
[14115.318871] i40e 0000:81:00.0 p1p1: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
[14115.720534] i40e 0000:81:00.1 p1p2: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
[14116.095680] team0: Mode changed to "activebackup"
[14116.541807] i40e 0000:81:00.0 p1p1: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
[14116.541875] team0: Port device p1p1 added
[14116.541998] i40e 0000:81:00.0 p1p1: set new mac address 66:8a:23:fd:0d:b4
[14116.550291] i40e 0000:81:00.0 p1p1: returning to hw mac address 1c:f3:fe:2a:ac:43
[14116.979676] i40e 0000:81:00.1 p1p2: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
[14116.979754] team0: Port device p1p2 added
[14116.979891] i40e 0000:81:00.1 p1p2: set new mac address 1c:f3:fe:2a:ac:43
[18629.573081] perf interrupt took too long (2503 > 2500), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 50000
[20255.441762] i40e 0000:81:00.0 p1p1: NIC Link is Down
[20255.633559] i40e 0000:81:00.1 p1p2: NIC Link is Down
[20785.109003] i40e 0000:81:00.0 p1p1: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
[20874.033531] i40e 0000:81:00.1 p1p2: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
[116397.167023] perf interrupt took too long (5006 > 5000), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 25000





linux networking rhel dmesg






share

























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    from the dmseg output we can see the following:



    seems that the error about the duplicate mac comes from team0 card



    as I know team card is internal card in the HW
    so how it can be that we get duplicate MAC?



    is it mean that other HW machine that have also team0 card have the same MAC?



    we have redhat machine version 7.3



    [14114.080815] i40e 0000:81:00.0 p1p1: already using mac address 1c:f3:fe:2a:ac:43
    [14114.080826] team0: Port device p1p1 removed
    [14114.374799] i40e 0000:81:00.1 p1p2: returning to hw mac address 3c:fd:fe:2a:cc:42 
    [14114.380880] team0: Port device p1p2 removed
    [14115.318871] i40e 0000:81:00.0 p1p1: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
    [14115.720534] i40e 0000:81:00.1 p1p2: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
    [14116.095680] team0: Mode changed to "activebackup"
    [14116.541807] i40e 0000:81:00.0 p1p1: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
    [14116.541875] team0: Port device p1p1 added
    [14116.541998] i40e 0000:81:00.0 p1p1: set new mac address 66:8a:23:fd:0d:b4
    [14116.550291] i40e 0000:81:00.0 p1p1: returning to hw mac address 1c:f3:fe:2a:ac:43
    [14116.979676] i40e 0000:81:00.1 p1p2: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
    [14116.979754] team0: Port device p1p2 added
    [14116.979891] i40e 0000:81:00.1 p1p2: set new mac address 1c:f3:fe:2a:ac:43
    [18629.573081] perf interrupt took too long (2503 > 2500), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 50000
    [20255.441762] i40e 0000:81:00.0 p1p1: NIC Link is Down
    [20255.633559] i40e 0000:81:00.1 p1p2: NIC Link is Down
    [20785.109003] i40e 0000:81:00.0 p1p1: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
    [20874.033531] i40e 0000:81:00.1 p1p2: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
    [116397.167023] perf interrupt took too long (5006 > 5000), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 25000





    linux networking rhel dmesg






    share























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      from the dmseg output we can see the following:



      seems that the error about the duplicate mac comes from team0 card



      as I know team card is internal card in the HW
      so how it can be that we get duplicate MAC?



      is it mean that other HW machine that have also team0 card have the same MAC?



      we have redhat machine version 7.3



      [14114.080815] i40e 0000:81:00.0 p1p1: already using mac address 1c:f3:fe:2a:ac:43
      [14114.080826] team0: Port device p1p1 removed
      [14114.374799] i40e 0000:81:00.1 p1p2: returning to hw mac address 3c:fd:fe:2a:cc:42 
      [14114.380880] team0: Port device p1p2 removed
      [14115.318871] i40e 0000:81:00.0 p1p1: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
      [14115.720534] i40e 0000:81:00.1 p1p2: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
      [14116.095680] team0: Mode changed to "activebackup"
      [14116.541807] i40e 0000:81:00.0 p1p1: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
      [14116.541875] team0: Port device p1p1 added
      [14116.541998] i40e 0000:81:00.0 p1p1: set new mac address 66:8a:23:fd:0d:b4
      [14116.550291] i40e 0000:81:00.0 p1p1: returning to hw mac address 1c:f3:fe:2a:ac:43
      [14116.979676] i40e 0000:81:00.1 p1p2: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
      [14116.979754] team0: Port device p1p2 added
      [14116.979891] i40e 0000:81:00.1 p1p2: set new mac address 1c:f3:fe:2a:ac:43
      [18629.573081] perf interrupt took too long (2503 > 2500), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 50000
      [20255.441762] i40e 0000:81:00.0 p1p1: NIC Link is Down
      [20255.633559] i40e 0000:81:00.1 p1p2: NIC Link is Down
      [20785.109003] i40e 0000:81:00.0 p1p1: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
      [20874.033531] i40e 0000:81:00.1 p1p2: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
      [116397.167023] perf interrupt took too long (5006 > 5000), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 25000





      linux networking rhel dmesg






      share













      from the dmseg output we can see the following:



      seems that the error about the duplicate mac comes from team0 card



      as I know team card is internal card in the HW
      so how it can be that we get duplicate MAC?



      is it mean that other HW machine that have also team0 card have the same MAC?



      we have redhat machine version 7.3



      [14114.080815] i40e 0000:81:00.0 p1p1: already using mac address 1c:f3:fe:2a:ac:43
      [14114.080826] team0: Port device p1p1 removed
      [14114.374799] i40e 0000:81:00.1 p1p2: returning to hw mac address 3c:fd:fe:2a:cc:42 
      [14114.380880] team0: Port device p1p2 removed
      [14115.318871] i40e 0000:81:00.0 p1p1: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
      [14115.720534] i40e 0000:81:00.1 p1p2: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
      [14116.095680] team0: Mode changed to "activebackup"
      [14116.541807] i40e 0000:81:00.0 p1p1: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
      [14116.541875] team0: Port device p1p1 added
      [14116.541998] i40e 0000:81:00.0 p1p1: set new mac address 66:8a:23:fd:0d:b4
      [14116.550291] i40e 0000:81:00.0 p1p1: returning to hw mac address 1c:f3:fe:2a:ac:43
      [14116.979676] i40e 0000:81:00.1 p1p2: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
      [14116.979754] team0: Port device p1p2 added
      [14116.979891] i40e 0000:81:00.1 p1p2: set new mac address 1c:f3:fe:2a:ac:43
      [18629.573081] perf interrupt took too long (2503 > 2500), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 50000
      [20255.441762] i40e 0000:81:00.0 p1p1: NIC Link is Down
      [20255.633559] i40e 0000:81:00.1 p1p2: NIC Link is Down
      [20785.109003] i40e 0000:81:00.0 p1p1: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
      [20874.033531] i40e 0000:81:00.1 p1p2: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
      [116397.167023] perf interrupt took too long (5006 > 5000), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 25000





      linux networking rhel dmesg




      linux networking rhel dmesg





      share












      share










      share



      share










      asked 7 mins ago









      yael

      2,1431650




      2,1431650

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479642%2flinux-already-using-mac-address%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






















          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479642%2flinux-already-using-mac-address%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest
































































          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Sep 26 at 0:12 ToanLuong 49 9 add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Se
          Read more

          Bahrain

          Image
          For other uses, see Bahrain (disambiguation). Sovereign island state in the Persian Gulf Kingdom of Bahrain مملكة البحرين   (Arabic) Mamlakat al-Baḥrayn Flag Coat of arms Anthem:  نشيد البحرين الوطني Bahrainona Our Bahrain Location of   Bahrain    (circled in red) Capital and largest city Manama 26°13′N 50°35′E  /  26.217°N 50.583°E  / 26.217; 50.583 Official languages Arabic Ethnic groups (2010 [1] ) 50.7% Arab (46% Bahrani, 4.7% other Arabs) 45.5% Asian 1% European 1.2% Others Religion Islam Demonym(s) Bahraini Government Unitary constitutional monarchy • King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa • Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa • Prime Minister Khalifa bin Salman Al Khalifa Legislature National Assembly • Upper house Consultative Council • Lower house Council of Representatives Independence • Declared Independence [2] 14 August 1971 • from United Kingdom [1] 15 August 1971 • Admitted to the United Nations 21 September 1971 • Kingdom of Bahrain 14 February 2002
          Read more

          Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 0 down vote favorite I am trying to setup postfix to relay all mail generated on the local machine via SMTP to a mailgun relay. I have used the mailgun relay before with success on an ubuntu server, but I am migrating to a Centos 7 server which I will be running in FIPS mode. There error log is below, slightly sanitized. I have a small enough network that I choose to have each machine reach out to mailgun individually (this the loopback-only, 127.0.0.0/8 restrictions) and no firewall open port allowing smtp in to the machine. I assume the FIPS mode (and with it disabling of MD5) is causing problems, but I don't know how to overcome it or if it is even possible for tls_fprint to use some supported hash such as sha256 or sha512. However, the relay=none is slightly concerning since I have relayhost set, but perhaps that is because the smtp process is failing? Any help would be appreciated! postconf -n: alias_database = hash:/etc/alia
          Read more