host not pinging guest VM [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












on a Win10 host i have a CentOS7 guest VM running on VMWARE Worstation14. To meet my requirement, i have configured two v-adapters.



  1. ens33 - NAT -- dhcp'ed IP to have internet access for the VM (192.168.33.128)

  2. ens37 - HOST ONLY -- static IP to have communication with other guest vm in the internal network and app development(192.168.242.128)

I checked the ips created on the host and i see two vmnets being created, (vmnet1)192.168.33.1 and (vmnet2)192.168.220.1 along with the 3rd eth adapter for the host itself, 192.168.0.x which it receives as a dhcp client.



I am new to vmware and its network config part. So i am filled with following queries.



I did some ping tests to determine which of the vmnets is for NAT and which is for host only. I found vmnet1 is for NAT and vmnet2 is for host only. But i wonder why vmnet2 is in the series of 192.168.220.x when the guest vm has 192.128.242.x?



Also i checked the gateway (route -n) and found the gateway is 192.168.33.2. Seeing the IP series i believe it to be the gateway for the NAT adapter but then where is the gateway for the host only adapter?



bash-4.1$ route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
0.0.0.0 192.168.33.2 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 ens33
192.168.33.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 ens33
192.168.242.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 ens37


Also I try pinging the guest vm ens37 from host and find Request timed out.



ping 192.168.242.128

Request timed out


however the guest vm ens33 is pingable and is giving me access to the VM. I expect that. Why is the guest VM not reachable to host via ens37?
All these doubts are filling up my mind...







share|improve this question














closed as off-topic by Jeff Schaller, Stephen Rauch, Archemar, roaima, G-Man Dec 10 '17 at 20:43


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Questions describing a problem that can't be reproduced and seemingly went away on its own (or went away when a typo was fixed) are off-topic as they are unlikely to help future readers." – Jeff Schaller, Stephen Rauch, Archemar, G-Man
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • Are IP addresses configured over NAT static in nature on the guest VMs? Even though my host gets dhcp IP, I donot see the NAT IP of my guest VM changing after multiple reboots?
    – Diganto Paul
    Dec 8 '17 at 16:17











  • I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because this isn't a UNIX or Linux issue.
    – roaima
    Dec 10 '17 at 20:12














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












on a Win10 host i have a CentOS7 guest VM running on VMWARE Worstation14. To meet my requirement, i have configured two v-adapters.



  1. ens33 - NAT -- dhcp'ed IP to have internet access for the VM (192.168.33.128)

  2. ens37 - HOST ONLY -- static IP to have communication with other guest vm in the internal network and app development(192.168.242.128)

I checked the ips created on the host and i see two vmnets being created, (vmnet1)192.168.33.1 and (vmnet2)192.168.220.1 along with the 3rd eth adapter for the host itself, 192.168.0.x which it receives as a dhcp client.



I am new to vmware and its network config part. So i am filled with following queries.



I did some ping tests to determine which of the vmnets is for NAT and which is for host only. I found vmnet1 is for NAT and vmnet2 is for host only. But i wonder why vmnet2 is in the series of 192.168.220.x when the guest vm has 192.128.242.x?



Also i checked the gateway (route -n) and found the gateway is 192.168.33.2. Seeing the IP series i believe it to be the gateway for the NAT adapter but then where is the gateway for the host only adapter?



bash-4.1$ route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
0.0.0.0 192.168.33.2 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 ens33
192.168.33.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 ens33
192.168.242.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 ens37


Also I try pinging the guest vm ens37 from host and find Request timed out.



ping 192.168.242.128

Request timed out


however the guest vm ens33 is pingable and is giving me access to the VM. I expect that. Why is the guest VM not reachable to host via ens37?
All these doubts are filling up my mind...







share|improve this question














closed as off-topic by Jeff Schaller, Stephen Rauch, Archemar, roaima, G-Man Dec 10 '17 at 20:43


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Questions describing a problem that can't be reproduced and seemingly went away on its own (or went away when a typo was fixed) are off-topic as they are unlikely to help future readers." – Jeff Schaller, Stephen Rauch, Archemar, G-Man
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • Are IP addresses configured over NAT static in nature on the guest VMs? Even though my host gets dhcp IP, I donot see the NAT IP of my guest VM changing after multiple reboots?
    – Diganto Paul
    Dec 8 '17 at 16:17











  • I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because this isn't a UNIX or Linux issue.
    – roaima
    Dec 10 '17 at 20:12












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











on a Win10 host i have a CentOS7 guest VM running on VMWARE Worstation14. To meet my requirement, i have configured two v-adapters.



  1. ens33 - NAT -- dhcp'ed IP to have internet access for the VM (192.168.33.128)

  2. ens37 - HOST ONLY -- static IP to have communication with other guest vm in the internal network and app development(192.168.242.128)

I checked the ips created on the host and i see two vmnets being created, (vmnet1)192.168.33.1 and (vmnet2)192.168.220.1 along with the 3rd eth adapter for the host itself, 192.168.0.x which it receives as a dhcp client.



I am new to vmware and its network config part. So i am filled with following queries.



I did some ping tests to determine which of the vmnets is for NAT and which is for host only. I found vmnet1 is for NAT and vmnet2 is for host only. But i wonder why vmnet2 is in the series of 192.168.220.x when the guest vm has 192.128.242.x?



Also i checked the gateway (route -n) and found the gateway is 192.168.33.2. Seeing the IP series i believe it to be the gateway for the NAT adapter but then where is the gateway for the host only adapter?



bash-4.1$ route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
0.0.0.0 192.168.33.2 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 ens33
192.168.33.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 ens33
192.168.242.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 ens37


Also I try pinging the guest vm ens37 from host and find Request timed out.



ping 192.168.242.128

Request timed out


however the guest vm ens33 is pingable and is giving me access to the VM. I expect that. Why is the guest VM not reachable to host via ens37?
All these doubts are filling up my mind...







share|improve this question














on a Win10 host i have a CentOS7 guest VM running on VMWARE Worstation14. To meet my requirement, i have configured two v-adapters.



  1. ens33 - NAT -- dhcp'ed IP to have internet access for the VM (192.168.33.128)

  2. ens37 - HOST ONLY -- static IP to have communication with other guest vm in the internal network and app development(192.168.242.128)

I checked the ips created on the host and i see two vmnets being created, (vmnet1)192.168.33.1 and (vmnet2)192.168.220.1 along with the 3rd eth adapter for the host itself, 192.168.0.x which it receives as a dhcp client.



I am new to vmware and its network config part. So i am filled with following queries.



I did some ping tests to determine which of the vmnets is for NAT and which is for host only. I found vmnet1 is for NAT and vmnet2 is for host only. But i wonder why vmnet2 is in the series of 192.168.220.x when the guest vm has 192.128.242.x?



Also i checked the gateway (route -n) and found the gateway is 192.168.33.2. Seeing the IP series i believe it to be the gateway for the NAT adapter but then where is the gateway for the host only adapter?



bash-4.1$ route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
0.0.0.0 192.168.33.2 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 ens33
192.168.33.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 ens33
192.168.242.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 ens37


Also I try pinging the guest vm ens37 from host and find Request timed out.



ping 192.168.242.128

Request timed out


however the guest vm ens33 is pingable and is giving me access to the VM. I expect that. Why is the guest VM not reachable to host via ens37?
All these doubts are filling up my mind...









share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 7 '17 at 2:43









Jason Rush

860412




860412










asked Dec 7 '17 at 2:31









Diganto Paul

375




375




closed as off-topic by Jeff Schaller, Stephen Rauch, Archemar, roaima, G-Man Dec 10 '17 at 20:43


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Questions describing a problem that can't be reproduced and seemingly went away on its own (or went away when a typo was fixed) are off-topic as they are unlikely to help future readers." – Jeff Schaller, Stephen Rauch, Archemar, G-Man
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




closed as off-topic by Jeff Schaller, Stephen Rauch, Archemar, roaima, G-Man Dec 10 '17 at 20:43


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Questions describing a problem that can't be reproduced and seemingly went away on its own (or went away when a typo was fixed) are off-topic as they are unlikely to help future readers." – Jeff Schaller, Stephen Rauch, Archemar, G-Man
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • Are IP addresses configured over NAT static in nature on the guest VMs? Even though my host gets dhcp IP, I donot see the NAT IP of my guest VM changing after multiple reboots?
    – Diganto Paul
    Dec 8 '17 at 16:17











  • I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because this isn't a UNIX or Linux issue.
    – roaima
    Dec 10 '17 at 20:12
















  • Are IP addresses configured over NAT static in nature on the guest VMs? Even though my host gets dhcp IP, I donot see the NAT IP of my guest VM changing after multiple reboots?
    – Diganto Paul
    Dec 8 '17 at 16:17











  • I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because this isn't a UNIX or Linux issue.
    – roaima
    Dec 10 '17 at 20:12















Are IP addresses configured over NAT static in nature on the guest VMs? Even though my host gets dhcp IP, I donot see the NAT IP of my guest VM changing after multiple reboots?
– Diganto Paul
Dec 8 '17 at 16:17





Are IP addresses configured over NAT static in nature on the guest VMs? Even though my host gets dhcp IP, I donot see the NAT IP of my guest VM changing after multiple reboots?
– Diganto Paul
Dec 8 '17 at 16:17













I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because this isn't a UNIX or Linux issue.
– roaima
Dec 10 '17 at 20:12




I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because this isn't a UNIX or Linux issue.
– roaima
Dec 10 '17 at 20:12










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













So sometimes the answer is quite simple if you look at it the other way. the mistake I had done is that I created the host only network adapter for the guest VMs but the static IP I was simply not correct. Duh! what was I thinking. It was only when I did tracert , I saw the trace going out of my system to my router and the outside world!! that spooked me. It should have been declined somewhere in the virtual bridge of my system itself. Then enlightenment occurred to me and I realised, that I was being dumb. I reset the static IPs of the guest VMs to 192.168.220.x and its all working now.






share|improve this answer



























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    2
    down vote













    So sometimes the answer is quite simple if you look at it the other way. the mistake I had done is that I created the host only network adapter for the guest VMs but the static IP I was simply not correct. Duh! what was I thinking. It was only when I did tracert , I saw the trace going out of my system to my router and the outside world!! that spooked me. It should have been declined somewhere in the virtual bridge of my system itself. Then enlightenment occurred to me and I realised, that I was being dumb. I reset the static IPs of the guest VMs to 192.168.220.x and its all working now.






    share|improve this answer
























      up vote
      2
      down vote













      So sometimes the answer is quite simple if you look at it the other way. the mistake I had done is that I created the host only network adapter for the guest VMs but the static IP I was simply not correct. Duh! what was I thinking. It was only when I did tracert , I saw the trace going out of my system to my router and the outside world!! that spooked me. It should have been declined somewhere in the virtual bridge of my system itself. Then enlightenment occurred to me and I realised, that I was being dumb. I reset the static IPs of the guest VMs to 192.168.220.x and its all working now.






      share|improve this answer






















        up vote
        2
        down vote










        up vote
        2
        down vote









        So sometimes the answer is quite simple if you look at it the other way. the mistake I had done is that I created the host only network adapter for the guest VMs but the static IP I was simply not correct. Duh! what was I thinking. It was only when I did tracert , I saw the trace going out of my system to my router and the outside world!! that spooked me. It should have been declined somewhere in the virtual bridge of my system itself. Then enlightenment occurred to me and I realised, that I was being dumb. I reset the static IPs of the guest VMs to 192.168.220.x and its all working now.






        share|improve this answer












        So sometimes the answer is quite simple if you look at it the other way. the mistake I had done is that I created the host only network adapter for the guest VMs but the static IP I was simply not correct. Duh! what was I thinking. It was only when I did tracert , I saw the trace going out of my system to my router and the outside world!! that spooked me. It should have been declined somewhere in the virtual bridge of my system itself. Then enlightenment occurred to me and I realised, that I was being dumb. I reset the static IPs of the guest VMs to 192.168.220.x and its all working now.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Dec 9 '17 at 14:15









        Diganto Paul

        375




        375












            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Bahrain

            Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay