Can only mount with gparted

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have the following /etc/fstab entry which fails to execute at system boot/startup:



/dev/sdb1 /media/ssd256 ext4 rw,user,exec,umask=000 0 0


Doing



sudo mount -a


yields:



mount: /media/ssd256: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.


However, if I sudo gparted and mount via its UI, then the device is mounted.
I am not sure how to fix this issue.



EDIT:
I changed the options to use defaults instead of rw,user,exec,umask=000, now sudo mount -a also works.
The question now is: what is wrong with my initial options?




mount gparted




share|improve this question


















  • 2




    Does gparted actually show an ext4 filesystem type for this device? What output for fsck command on /dev/sdb1? What if you replace options rw,user,exec,umask=000 with just "defaults"?
    – tonioc
    Jan 13 at 8:30










  • Did you fsck /dev/sdb1 ?
    – Mukesh Sai Kumar
    Jan 13 at 8:33














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have the following /etc/fstab entry which fails to execute at system boot/startup:



/dev/sdb1 /media/ssd256 ext4 rw,user,exec,umask=000 0 0


Doing



sudo mount -a


yields:



mount: /media/ssd256: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.


However, if I sudo gparted and mount via its UI, then the device is mounted.
I am not sure how to fix this issue.



EDIT:
I changed the options to use defaults instead of rw,user,exec,umask=000, now sudo mount -a also works.
The question now is: what is wrong with my initial options?




mount gparted




share|improve this question


















  • 2




    Does gparted actually show an ext4 filesystem type for this device? What output for fsck command on /dev/sdb1? What if you replace options rw,user,exec,umask=000 with just "defaults"?
    – tonioc
    Jan 13 at 8:30










  • Did you fsck /dev/sdb1 ?
    – Mukesh Sai Kumar
    Jan 13 at 8:33












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I have the following /etc/fstab entry which fails to execute at system boot/startup:



/dev/sdb1 /media/ssd256 ext4 rw,user,exec,umask=000 0 0


Doing



sudo mount -a


yields:



mount: /media/ssd256: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.


However, if I sudo gparted and mount via its UI, then the device is mounted.
I am not sure how to fix this issue.



EDIT:
I changed the options to use defaults instead of rw,user,exec,umask=000, now sudo mount -a also works.
The question now is: what is wrong with my initial options?




mount gparted




share|improve this question














I have the following /etc/fstab entry which fails to execute at system boot/startup:



/dev/sdb1 /media/ssd256 ext4 rw,user,exec,umask=000 0 0


Doing



sudo mount -a


yields:



mount: /media/ssd256: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.


However, if I sudo gparted and mount via its UI, then the device is mounted.
I am not sure how to fix this issue.



EDIT:
I changed the options to use defaults instead of rw,user,exec,umask=000, now sudo mount -a also works.
The question now is: what is wrong with my initial options?





mount gparted





share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 13 at 8:37

























asked Jan 13 at 8:21









erdal.karaca

1033




1033







  • 2




    Does gparted actually show an ext4 filesystem type for this device? What output for fsck command on /dev/sdb1? What if you replace options rw,user,exec,umask=000 with just "defaults"?
    – tonioc
    Jan 13 at 8:30










  • Did you fsck /dev/sdb1 ?
    – Mukesh Sai Kumar
    Jan 13 at 8:33












  • 2




    Does gparted actually show an ext4 filesystem type for this device? What output for fsck command on /dev/sdb1? What if you replace options rw,user,exec,umask=000 with just "defaults"?
    – tonioc
    Jan 13 at 8:30










  • Did you fsck /dev/sdb1 ?
    – Mukesh Sai Kumar
    Jan 13 at 8:33







2




2




Does gparted actually show an ext4 filesystem type for this device? What output for fsck command on /dev/sdb1? What if you replace options rw,user,exec,umask=000 with just "defaults"?
– tonioc
Jan 13 at 8:30




Does gparted actually show an ext4 filesystem type for this device? What output for fsck command on /dev/sdb1? What if you replace options rw,user,exec,umask=000 with just "defaults"?
– tonioc
Jan 13 at 8:30












Did you fsck /dev/sdb1 ?
– Mukesh Sai Kumar
Jan 13 at 8:33




Did you fsck /dev/sdb1 ?
– Mukesh Sai Kumar
Jan 13 at 8:33










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










dmesg| tail will show



EXT4-fs (dm-4): Unrecognized mount option "umask=000" or missing value


Indeed, umask option is not part of accepted ones for ext4 fs : see man mount



this is why...






share|improve this answer




















    Your Answer







    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "106"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f416763%2fcan-only-mount-with-gparted%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest

















    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    dmesg| tail will show



    EXT4-fs (dm-4): Unrecognized mount option "umask=000" or missing value


    Indeed, umask option is not part of accepted ones for ext4 fs : see man mount



    this is why...






    share|improve this answer
























      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      dmesg| tail will show



      EXT4-fs (dm-4): Unrecognized mount option "umask=000" or missing value


      Indeed, umask option is not part of accepted ones for ext4 fs : see man mount



      this is why...






      share|improve this answer






















        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted






        dmesg| tail will show



        EXT4-fs (dm-4): Unrecognized mount option "umask=000" or missing value


        Indeed, umask option is not part of accepted ones for ext4 fs : see man mount



        this is why...






        share|improve this answer












        dmesg| tail will show



        EXT4-fs (dm-4): Unrecognized mount option "umask=000" or missing value


        Indeed, umask option is not part of accepted ones for ext4 fs : see man mount



        this is why...







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Jan 13 at 9:13









        tonioc

        1,12457




        1,12457






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f416763%2fcan-only-mount-with-gparted%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest
































































            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Sep 26 at 0:12 ToanLuong 49 9 add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Se
            Read more

            Bahrain

            Image
            For other uses, see Bahrain (disambiguation). Sovereign island state in the Persian Gulf Kingdom of Bahrain مملكة البحرين   (Arabic) Mamlakat al-Baḥrayn Flag Coat of arms Anthem:  نشيد البحرين الوطني Bahrainona Our Bahrain Location of   Bahrain    (circled in red) Capital and largest city Manama 26°13′N 50°35′E  /  26.217°N 50.583°E  / 26.217; 50.583 Official languages Arabic Ethnic groups (2010 [1] ) 50.7% Arab (46% Bahrani, 4.7% other Arabs) 45.5% Asian 1% European 1.2% Others Religion Islam Demonym(s) Bahraini Government Unitary constitutional monarchy • King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa • Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa • Prime Minister Khalifa bin Salman Al Khalifa Legislature National Assembly • Upper house Consultative Council • Lower house Council of Representatives Independence • Declared Independence [2] 14 August 1971 • from United Kingdom [1] 15 August 1971 • Admitted to the United Nations 21 September 1971 • Kingdom of Bahrain 14 February 2002
            Read more

            Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 0 down vote favorite I am trying to setup postfix to relay all mail generated on the local machine via SMTP to a mailgun relay. I have used the mailgun relay before with success on an ubuntu server, but I am migrating to a Centos 7 server which I will be running in FIPS mode. There error log is below, slightly sanitized. I have a small enough network that I choose to have each machine reach out to mailgun individually (this the loopback-only, 127.0.0.0/8 restrictions) and no firewall open port allowing smtp in to the machine. I assume the FIPS mode (and with it disabling of MD5) is causing problems, but I don't know how to overcome it or if it is even possible for tls_fprint to use some supported hash such as sha256 or sha512. However, the relay=none is slightly concerning since I have relayhost set, but perhaps that is because the smtp process is failing? Any help would be appreciated! postconf -n: alias_database = hash:/etc/alia
            Read more